Skip to main content
Log in

Tensile Fracture Strength of Brisbane Tuff by Static and Cyclic Loading Tests

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This research presents the results of laboratory experiments during the investigation of tensile strength–strain characteristics of Brisbane tuff disc specimens under static and diametral cyclic loading. Three different cyclic loading methods were used; namely, sinusoidal cyclic loading, type I and II increasing cyclic loading with various amplitude values. The first method applied the stress amplitude−cycle number (s–n) curve approach to the measurement of the indirect tensile strength (ITS) and fracture toughness (K IC) values of rocks for the first time in the literature. The type I and II methods investigated the effect of increasing cyclic loading on the ITS and K IC of rocks. For Brisbane tuff, the reduction in ITS was found to be 30 % under sinusoidal loading, whereas type I and II increasing cyclic loading caused a maximum reduction in ITS of 36 %. The maximum reduction of the static K IC of 46 % was obtained for the highest amplitude type I cyclic loading tested. For sinusoidal cyclic loading, a maximum reduction of the static K IC of 30 % was obtained. A continuous irreversible accumulation of damage was observed in dynamic cyclic tests conducted at different amplitudes and mean stress levels. Scanning electron microscope images showed that fatigue damage in Brisbane tuff is strongly influenced by the failure of the matrix because of both inter-granular fracturing and trans-granular fracturing. The main characteristic was grain breakage under cyclic loading, which probably starts at points of contact between grains and is accompanied by the production of very small fragments, probably due to frictional sliding within the weak matrix.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al-Shayea NA (2005) Crack propagation trajectories for rocks under mixed mode I-II fracture. Eng Geol 81:84–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson BK (1984) Subcritical crack growth in geological materials. J Geophys Res 89:4077–4114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson C, Smelser RE, Sanchez J (1982) Combined mode fracture via the cracked Brazilian disk test. Int J Fracture 18(4):279–291

    Google Scholar 

  • Attawel PB, Farmer IW (1973) Fatigue behaviour of rock. Int J Rock Mech Min 10(1):1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Awaji H, Sato S (1978) Combined mode fracture toughness measurement by the disk test. J Eng Mater Technol 100:175–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagde MN, Pedros V (2005) Fatigue properties of intact sandstone samples subjected to dynamic uniaxial cyclical loading. Int J Rock Mech Min 42(2):237–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bienawskie ZT (1967) Mechanism of brittle rock fracture: part II-experimental studies. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abs 4(4):407–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burdine NT (1963) Rock failure under dynamic failure conditions. SPE J 3(1):1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Celestino TB, Bortolucci AA (1995) Determination of rock fracture toughness under creep and fatigue: the 35th U.S. symposium on rock mechanics. New York, pp 147–52

  • Chong KP, Kuruppu MD (1984) New specimen for fracture toughness determination of rock and other materials. Int J Fract 26:59–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costin LS, Holcomb DJ (1981) Time-dependent failure of rock under cyclic loading. Tectonophysics 79(3–4):279–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erarslan N, Williams DJ (2012a) The damage mechanism of rock fatigue and its relationship to the fracture toughness of rocks. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 56:15–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Erarslan N, Williams DJ (2012b) Mechanism of rock fatigue damage in terms of fracturing modes. Int J of Fatigue 43:76–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans AG (1980) Fatigue in ceramics. Int J Fract 16(6):485–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans AG, Fuller ER (1974) Crack propagation in ceramic materials under cyclic loading conditions. Metall Trans 5(1):27–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith AA (1920) The phenomena of rupture and flow in solids philos. Trans R Soc Lond 221:163–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo H, Aziz NI, Schmidt LC (1993) Rock fracture toughness determination Brazilian test. Eng Geol 33:177–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hadley K (1976) The effect of cyclic stress on dilatancy: another look. J Geophys Res 81(14):2471–2474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haimson BC (1978) Effect of cyclic loading on rock. In: Dynamic geotechnical testing, ASTM STP 654. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, pp 228–245

  • Haimson BC, Kim CM (1971) Mechanical behaviour of rock under cyclic fatigue. Rock Mech 3:845–863

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoek E (1968) Brittle fracture of rocks. In: Stagg KG, Zienkiewicz OC (eds) Rock mechanics in engineering practice. John Wiley, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Inglis CE (1913) Stresses in a plate due to the presence of cracks and sharp corners. Trans Inst Naval Archit 55:219

    Google Scholar 

  • ISRM (1978) International society for rock mechanics. Suggested methods for determining tensile strength of rock materials. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abs 15:99–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ISRM (1995) Suggested method for determining mode I fracture toughness using cracked chevron notched Brazilian disk (CCNBD) specimens. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abs 32(1):57–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lajtai EZ (1971) A theoretical and experimental evaluation of the Griffith theory of brittle fracture. Tectonophysics 11:129–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nemat-Nasser S, Deng H (1994) Strain rate effect on brittle failure in compression. Acta Metall Mater 42:1013–1024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ouchterlony F (1988) Suggested methods for determining the fracture toughness of rock. Int J Rock Mec Min Sci Geomech Abs 25(2):71–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Shetty DK, Rosenfield AR, Duckworth WH (1985) Fracture toughness of ceramics measured by a chevron notch diametral compression test. J Am Ceram Soc 68(12):C325–C327

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh SK (1989) Fatigue and strain hardening behaviour of greywacke from the flagstaff formation, NSW. Eng Geol 26:171–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tao Z, Mo H (1990) An experimental study and analysis of the behaviour of rock under cyclic loading. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abs 27:51–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker BN, Singh RN, Sun G (1992) Rock fracture mechanics-principles, design and applications. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang ZX, Kou SQ, Yu J, Yu Y, Jiang LG, Lindqvist PA (1999) Effects of loading rate on rock fracture. Int J Rock Mech Min 36(5):597–611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao J, Li HB (2000) Experimental determination of dynamic tensile properties of granite. Int J Rock Mech Min 37:851–861

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Acknowledgement is made to Leighton Contractors who provided core samples of Brisbane tuff from the CLEM7 Project and to Professor Ted Brown, Les McQueen, Mark Funkhauser and Rob Morphet of Golder Associates Pty Ltd for their assistance and advice. The work described forms part of the first author’s PhD research carried out within the then Golder Geomechanics Centre at The University of Queensland. The first author was supported by an Australian Postgraduate Award/UQRS and the Golder Geomechanics Centre.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. Erarslan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Erarslan, N., Alehossein, H. & Williams, D.J. Tensile Fracture Strength of Brisbane Tuff by Static and Cyclic Loading Tests. Rock Mech Rock Eng 47, 1135–1151 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-013-0469-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-013-0469-5

Keywords

Navigation