Skip to main content
Log in

Constraints on the Sealing Capacity of Faults with Clay Smears from Discrete Element Models Validated by Laboratory Experiments

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Prediction of hydrocarbon column heights in structural traps critically depends on proper analysis of the sealing capacity of faults. Entrainment of clay in fault zones in upper crustal levels may lead to the development of continuous clay smears that dramatically increase the sealing capacity of faults. In this study, direct shear experiments on large-scale samples of layered sandstone–claystone–sandstone are simulated using two-dimensional discrete element numerical models to study the development of clay smears for different claystone types and normal stress conditions. Analysis of clay smear structures in terms of drag, slicing, wear and flow of clay reveals that drag is dominant at low shear displacements and high local stress concentrations, slicing and wear become important at higher shear displacement and low stresses at source bed near the fault zone. Correlation between critical fault displacements in the experiments and local stress ratios (shear stress divided by normal stress) in the models is used to determine smear failure and leakage for all claystones and normal stresses. A smear breach diagram with sealing/leaking conditions for faults containing clay smears shows that clay smears may be sealing at larger displacements than predicted by other fault seal algorithms, such as shale gouge ratio, in particular for low shale content and high normal stress.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allan US (1989) Model for hydrocarbon migration and entrapment within faulted structures. AAPG Bull 73:803–811

    Google Scholar 

  • Aydin A, Eyal Y (2002) Anatomy of a normal fault with shale smear: implications for fault seal. AAPG Bull 8:1367–1381

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouvier JD, Kaarssijpesteijn CH, Kluesner DF, Onyejekwe CC, Vanderpal RC (1989) 3-Dimensional seismic interpretation and fault sealing investigations, nun river field, Nigeria. AAPG Bull 73:1397–1414

    Google Scholar 

  • Childs C, Sylta Ø, Moriya S, Morewood N, Manzocchi T, Walsh JJ, Hermanssen D (2009) Calibrating fault seal using a hydrocarbon migration model of the Oseberg Syd area, Viking Graben. Mar Pet Geol 26:764–774

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho N, Martin CD, Sego DC (2007) A clumped particle model for rock. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 44:997–1010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Çiftçi NB, Giger SB, Clennell MB (2013) Three-dimensional structure of experimentally produced clay smears: implications for fault seal analysis. AAPG Bull. doi:10.1306/10161211192

  • Cuisiat F, Skurtveit E (2010) An experimental investigation of the development and permeability of clay smears along faults in uncemented sediments. J Struct Geol 32:1850–1863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cundall PA, Strack ODL (1979) A discrete numerical model for granular assemblies. Geotechnique 29:47–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doughty T (2003) Clay smear seals and fault sealing potential of an exhumed growth fault, rio grande rift, New Mexico. AAPG Bull 87:427–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egholm DL, Clausen OR, Sandiford M, Kristensen MB, Korstgard JA (2008) The mechanics of clay smearing along faults. Geology 36:787–790

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher QJ, Knipe RJ (2001) The permeability of faults within siliciclastic petroleum reservoirs of the North Sea and Norwegian Continental Shelf. Mar Pet Geol 18:1063–1081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman SR, Harris SD, Knipe RJ (2010) Cross-fault sealing, baffling and fluid flow in 3D geological models: tools for analysis, visualization and interpretation. In: Jolley SJ, Fisher QJ, Ainsworth RB, Vrolijk PJ, Delisle SJ (eds) Reservoir Compartmentalization. Geol Soc London Spec Publ, vol 347, pp 257–282

  • Fulljames JR, Zijerveld LJJ, Franssen RCMW (1997) Fault seal processes: systematic analysis of fault seals over geological and production time scales. In: Moeller Pedersen P, Koestler AG (eds) Hydrocarbon seals: importance for exploration and production. Norwegian Petroleum Soc Spec Publ, vol 7, pp 51–59

  • Giger SB, Clennell MB, Harbers C, Clark P, Ricchetti M, TerHeege JH, Wassing BBT, Orlic B (2011) Design, operation and validation of a new fluid-sealed direct shear apparatus capable of monitoring fault-related fluid flow to large displacements. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 48:1160–1172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giger SB, Clennell MB, Çiftçi NB, Harbers C, Clark P, Ricchetti M (2013) Fault transmissibility in clastic-argillaceous sequences controlled by clay smear evolution. AAPG Bulletin. doi:10.1306/10161211190

  • Jolley SJ, Dijk D, Lamens JH, Fisher QJ, Manzocchi T, Eikmans H, Huang Y (2007) Faulting and fault sealing in production simulation models: brent province, northern North Sea. Petrol Geosci 13:321–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kock I, Huhn K (2007) Influence of particle shape on the frictional strength of sediments—A numerical case study. Sed Geol 196:217–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay NG, Murphy FC, Walsh JJ, Watterson J (1993) Outcrop studies of shale smear on fault surfaces. In: Flint S, Bryant I (eds) The Geological modelling of hydrocarbon reservoirs and outcrop analogs. Int Ass Sed Spec Publ, vol 15, pp 113–123

  • Potyondy DO (2012) A flat-jointed bonded-particle material for hard rock. In: Proceedings of 46th US rock mechanics/geomechanics symposium (ARMA), Chicago, pp 12–501

  • Potyondy DO, Cundall PA (2004) A bonded-particle model for rock. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 41:1329–1364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schöpfer MPJ, Childs C, Walsh JJ, Manzocchi T, Koyi HA (2007) Geometrical analysis of the refraction and segmentation of normal faults in periodically layered sequences. J Struct Geol 29:318–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi M (2003) Permeability change during experimental fault smearing. J Geophys Res 108:2235. doi:10.1029/2002JB001984

    Google Scholar 

  • TerHeege JH, Wassing BBT, Orlic B, Giger SB, Cifti NB, Clennell MB (2012) An integrated experimental and modeling approach to determine the interplay between deformation conditions, rock properties, and development of clay smears. In: Proceedings of 46th US rock mechanics/geomechanics symposium (ARMA), Chicago, pp 12–407

  • VanderZee W, Urai JL (2005) Processes of normal fault evolution in a silici clastic sequence: a case study from Miri, Sarawak, Malaysia. J Struct Geol 27:2281–2300. doi:10.1016/j.jsg.2005.07.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber K, Mandl G, Pilaar WF, Lehner F, Precious RG (1978) The role of faults in hydrocarbon migration and trapping in Nigerian growth fault structures. Offshore Tech Conf 10(3356):2643–2653

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiprut D, Zoback MD (2000) Fault reactivation and fluid flow along a previously dormant normal fault in the northern North Sea. Geology 28:595–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yielding G (2002) The Shale Gouge Ratio—calibration by geohistory. In: Koestler AG, Hunsdale R (eds) Hydrocarbon seal quantification, Amsterdam, Elsevier, Norwegian Petrol Soc Spec Publ, vol 11, pp 1–15

  • Yielding G, Freeman B, Needham DT (1997) Quantitative fault seal prediction. AAPG Bull 81:897–917

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The research presented in this manuscript has been performed within the framework of a joint-industry research project on Dynamic Fault Seals. TNO and CSIRO gratefully acknowledge the support of Total, Petrobras, and ConocoPhillips and technical discussions with company representatives in this project. Comments of Antonio Bobet and an anonymous reviewer improved the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. H. TerHeege.

Additional information

Submitted to the Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering Journal Special Issue on the 46th ARMA conference, Chicago 2012.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

TerHeege, J.H., Wassing, B.B.T., Orlic, B. et al. Constraints on the Sealing Capacity of Faults with Clay Smears from Discrete Element Models Validated by Laboratory Experiments. Rock Mech Rock Eng 46, 465–478 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-013-0383-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-013-0383-x

Keywords

Navigation