Skip to main content
Log in

Response by the Authors to S. R. Hencher’s Discussion of the Paper “Comparison of Different Techniques of Tilt Testing and Basic Friction Angle Variability Assessment

  • Reply
  • Published:
Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

References

  • Alejano LR, González J, Muralha J (2012) Comparison of different techniques of tilt testing and basic friction angle variability assessment. Rock Mech Rock Eng. doi:10.1007/s00603-012-0265-7

  • Barton N (1999) 20th Century lessons and 21st Century challenges in applied rock mechanics. General Report to the 9th ISRM Congress, Paris. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 1659–1679

  • Barton N (2011) From empiricism, through theory, to problem solving in rock engineering. 6th Leopold Muller Lecture. In: Qian Q, Zhou Y (eds) 12th ISRM international congress on rock mechanics, Beijing. CRC Press, London, pp 3–14

  • Barton N, Choubey V (1977) The shear strength of rock joints in theory and practice. Rock Mech 10:1–54. doi:10.1007/BF01261801

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leandro R. Alejano.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Alejano, L.R., González, J. & Muralha, J. Response by the Authors to S. R. Hencher’s Discussion of the Paper “Comparison of Different Techniques of Tilt Testing and Basic Friction Angle Variability Assessment. Rock Mech Rock Eng 45, 1141–1143 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-012-0316-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-012-0316-0

Keywords

Navigation