Skip to main content
Log in

Statistical Method for Assessing the Uniaxial Compressive Strength of Carbonate Rock by Schmidt Hammer Tests Performed on Core Samples

  • Technical Note
  • Published:
Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

References

  • Ayday C, Göktan RM (1992) Correlations between L and N-type Schmidt hammer rebound values obtained during field testing. In: Proceedings of the International ISRM Symposium on Rock Characterization, Chester, UK, September 1992, pp 47–50

  • Aydin A (2008) ISRM suggested method for determination of the Schmidt hammer rebound hardness: revised version. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 46:627–634

    Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin JR, Cornell CA (1970) Probability, statistics and decision for civil engineers. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Camusso M, Barla M, Barla G (2005) Analisi della spinta per un caso di microtunnelling in calcari. In: Incontro Annuale dei Ricercatori di Geotecnica (IARG), Ancona, Italy, June–July 2005, pp 1–4 (in Italian)

  • Cargill JS, Shakoor A (1990) Evaluation of empirical methods for measuring the uniaxial compressive strength of rock. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 27:495–503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deere DU, Miller RP (1966) Engineering classification and index properties for intact rock. Air Force Weapons Laboratory, Technical Report No. AFWL-TR-65-116, Kirtland Air Base, New Mexico

  • Fener M, Kahraman S, Bilgil A, Gunaydin O (2005) A comparative evaluation of indirect methods to estimate the compressive strength of rocks. Rock Mech Rock Eng 38(4):329–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freedman D, Diaconis P (1981) On the histogram as a density estimator: L 2 theory. Probab Theory Relat Fields 57(4):453–476

    Google Scholar 

  • Geological Society of London, Engineering Group Working Party (1970) Report on the logging of rock cores for engineering purposes. Q J Eng Geol 3:1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Güney A, Altındağ R, Yavuz H, Saraç S (2005) Evaluation of the relationships between Schmidt hardness rebound number and other (engineering) properties of rocks. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Mining Congress and Fair of Turkey (IMCET 2005), İzmir, Turkey, June 2005

  • Kahraman S (2001) Evaluation of simple methods for assessing the uniaxial compressive strength of rock. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 38:981–994

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahraman S, Bilgin N, Feridunoglu C (2003) Dominant rock properties affecting the penetration rate of percussive drills. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 40:711–723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karakus M, Kumral M, Kiliç O (2005) Predicting elastic properties of intact rocks from index tests using multiple regression modelling. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 42:323–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz O, Reches Z, Roegiers JC (2000) Evaluation of mechanical rock properties using a Schmidt hammer. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 37:723–728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiliç A, Teymen A (2008) Determination of mechanical properties of rocks using simple methods. Bull Eng Geol Environ 67:237–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larson HJ (1975) Statistics: an introduction. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Rourke JE (1989) Rock index properties for geo-engineering in underground development. Min Eng 106–110

  • Piano Particolareggiato di Zona C3—Comune di Giovinazzo (2007) Relazione geologica e geomorfologica, pp 1–25

  • PROGER (2006) A.A. Studio di prefattibilità. vol III—Riassetto del nodo ferroviario di Bari. Riduzione delle interferenze tra linee ferroviarie e territorio

  • Sachpazis CI (1990) Correlating Schmidt hardness with compressive strength and Young’s modulus of carbonate rocks. Bull Int Assoc Eng Geol 42:75–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott DW (1979) On optimal and data-based histograms. Biometrika 66(3):605–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shalabi FI, Cording EJ, Al-Hattamleh OH (2007) Estimation of rock engineering properties using hardness tests. Eng Geol 90:138–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • StatPoint Technologies, Inc. (2006) Statgraphics Centurion XV

  • Sturges HA (1926) The choice of a class interval. J Am Stat Assoc 21:65–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tukey JW (1977) Exploratory data analysis. Addison-Wesley, Reading

    Google Scholar 

  • Yagiz S (2009) Predicting uniaxial compressive strength, modulus of elasticity and index properties of rocks using the Schmidt hammer. Bull Eng Geol Environ 68:55–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yaşar E, Erdoğan Y (2004a) Estimation of rock physicomechanical properties using hardness methods. Eng Geol 71:281–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yaşar E, Erdoğan Y (2004b) Correlating sound velocity with the density, compressive strength and Young’s modulus of carbonate rocks. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 41(5):871–875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yılmaz I, Sendır H (2002) Correlation of Schmidt hardness with unconfined compressive strength and Young’s modulus in gypsum from Sivas (Turkey). Eng Geol 66:211–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Vessia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bruno, G., Vessia, G. & Bobbo, L. Statistical Method for Assessing the Uniaxial Compressive Strength of Carbonate Rock by Schmidt Hammer Tests Performed on Core Samples. Rock Mech Rock Eng 46, 199–206 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-012-0230-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-012-0230-5

Keywords

Navigation