Skip to main content
Log in

The Planar Shape of Rock Joints

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Knowing the planar shape of discontinuities is important when characterizing discontinuities in a rock mass. However, the real discontinuity shape is rarely known, since the rock mass is usually inaccessible in three dimensions. Information on discontinuity shape is limited and often open to more than one interpretation. This paper discusses the planar shape of rock joints, the most common discontinuities in rock. First, a brief literature review about the shape of joints is presented, including some information on joint-surface morphology, inferences from observed trace lengths on different sampling planes, information based on experimental studies, and joint shapes assumed by different researchers. This review shows that joints not affected by adjacent geological structures such as bedding boundaries or pre-existing fractures tend to be elliptical (or approximately circular but rarely). Joints affected by or intersecting such geological structures tend to be rectangular. Then, using the general stereological relationship between trace length distributions and joint size distributions developed by Zhang et al. (Geotechnique 52(6):419–433, 2002) for elliptical joints, the effect of sampling plane orientation on trace lengths is investigated. This study explains why the average trace lengths of non-equidimensional (elliptical or similar polygonal) joints on two sampling planes can be about equal and thus the conclusion that rock joints are equidimensional (circular) drawn from the fact that the average trace lengths on two sampling planes are approximately equal can be wrong. Finally, methods for characterizing the shape and size of joints (elliptical or rectangular) from trace length data are recommended, and the appropriateness of using elliptical joint shapes to represent polygonal, especially rectangular, joints is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The terms joint and fracture will be used interchangeably as is often the case in the engineering literature.

References

  • Ameen MS (1995) Fractography: fracture topography as a tool in fracture mechanics and stress analysis. The Geological Society, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Baecher GN, Lanney NA, Einstein HH (1977) Statistical description of rock properties and sampling. In: 18th US symposium on rock mechanics, 5C1-8

  • Bahat D (1988) Fractographics determination of joint length distribution in chalk. Rock Mech Rock Eng 21(1):79–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bahat D, Bankwitz P, Bankwitz E (2003) Preuplift joints in granites: evidence for subcritical and postcritical fracture growth. GSA Bull 115(2):148–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Bankwitz P (1965) Ueber Kluefte: I. Beobachtungen im Thuringischen Schiefergebirge. Geologie 14:241–253

    Google Scholar 

  • Bankwitz P (1966) Ueber Kluefte: II. Die Bildung der Kluftoberflaeche und eine Systematik ihrer Strukturen. Geologie 15:896–941

    Google Scholar 

  • Bankwitz P (1978) Ueber Kluefte: III. Die Entstehung von Saulenkluften. Zeitschrift Geol Wissenschaften 6:285–299

    Google Scholar 

  • Bankwitz P, Bankwitz E (1984) Beitrag zur Interpretation von Rupturen. Zeitschrift fur Angewandte Geologie 30:265–271

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton CM (1977) Geotechnical analysis of rock structure and fabric in CSA Mine NSW. Applied Geomechanics Technical Paper 24, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization, Australia

  • Baudo A (2001) 1-D Fractal, Geostatistical and abusing analyses of fractures along a 4 km scanline. MS thesis, The State University of New York at Buffalo

  • Becker A, Gross MR (1996) Mechanism for joint saturation in mechanically layered rocks: an example from Southern Israel. Tectonophysics 257:223–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bridges MC (1976) Presentation of fracture data for rock mechanics. In: 2nd Australia-New Zealand conference on geomechanics, Brisbane, pp 144–148

  • Chan LP (1986) Application of Block theory and simulation techniques to optimum design of rock excavations. PhD thesis, University of California, Berkeley

  • Cloos E (1955) Experimental analysis of fracture patterns. Geol Soc Am Bull 66(3):241–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daneshy AA (1973) Three-dimensional propagation of hydraulic fractures extending from open holes. In: Application of rock mechanics—15th symposium on rock mechanics, Custer State Park, SD, pp 157–179

  • Dershowitz WS (1998) Discrete feature approach for heterogeneous reservoir production enhancement. Progress Report: October 1, 1998–December 31, 1998, Golder Associates Inc

  • Dershowitz WS, Einstein HH (1988) Characterizing rock joint geometry with joint system models. Rock Mech Rock Eng 21:21–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dershowitz WS, Lee G, Geier J, Foxford T, LaPointe P, Thomas A (1993) FracMan, interactive discrete feature data analysis, geometric modeling, and exploration simulation. User documentation, Version 2.3, Golder Associates Inc., Seattle

  • Einstein HH, Bobet A (2004) Crack coalescence in brittle materials: an overview. In: Schubert (ed) EUROCK 2004 & 53rd geomechanics colloquium

  • Einstein HH, Dershowitz WS (1990) Tensile and shear fracturing in predominantly compressive stress fields—a review. Eng Geol 29:149–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Einstein HH, Baecher GB, Veneziano D (1979) Risk analysis for rock slopes in open pit mines—final technical report, Parts I–V, USBM J 027 5015, Department of Civil Engineering, MIT, Cambridge, MA

  • Gross MR, Bahat D, Becker A (1997) Relations between jointing and faulting based on fracture-spacing ratios and fault-slip profiles: a new method to estimate strain in layered rocks. Geology 25(10):887–890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson RA (1961) Classification of structures on joint surfaces. Am J Sci 259:493–502

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoek E (1968) Brittle fracture of rock. In: Stagg KG, Zienkiewicz OC (eds) Rock mechanics in engineering practice. Wiley, pp 99–124

  • Horii H, Nemat-Nasser S (1986) Brittle failure in compression: splitting, faulting and brittle ductile transition. Phil Trans R Soc Lond Math Phys Sci 319(1549)

  • ISRM (1978) Suggested methods for the quantitative description of discontinuities in rock masses. International Society for Rock Mechanics, Commission on standardization of laboratory and field tests. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 15:319–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ivanova V (1995) Three-dimensional stochastic modeling of rock fracture systems. MS thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA

  • Ivanova V (1998) Geologic and stochastic modeling of fracture systems in rocks. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA

  • Kulander BR, Barton CC, Dean SL (1979) The application of fractography to core and outcrop fracture investigations. U.S. Department of Energy Report METC/SP-79/3, Morgantown Energy Research Center, p 175

  • Kulatilake PHSW, Wu TH, Wathugala DN (1990) Probabilistic modeling of joint orientation. Int J Num Anal Method Geomech 14:325–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulatilake PHSW, Wathugala DN, Stephansson O (1993) Stochastic three dimensional joint size, intensity and system modeling and a validation to an area in Stripa Mine, Sweden. Soils Found 33(1):55–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Lajtai EZ (1969) Strength of discontinuous rocks in direct shear. Geotechnique 19(2):218–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locsin JLZ (2005) Modeling joint patterns using combinations of mechanical and probabilistic concepts. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA

  • Mandl G (2005) Rock joints—the mechanical genesis. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer T (1999) Geologic stochastic modeling of rock fracture systems related to crustal faults. MS thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA

  • Moriya H, Fujita T, Niitsuma H, Eisenblätter J, Manthei G (2006) Analysis of fracture propagation behavior using hydraulically induced acoustic emissions in the Bernburg salt mine, Germany. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 43(1):49–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petit J-P, Massonnat G, Pueo F, Rawnsley K (1994) Rapport de forme des fractures de mode 1 dans les roches stratifiees: Une etude de cas dans le Bassin Permian de Lodeve (France). Bulletin du Centre de Recherches Elf Exploration Production 18(1):211–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollard DD, Aydin AA (1988) Progress in understanding jointing over the past century. Geol Soc Am Bull 1001:1181–1204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price NJ (1966) Fault and joint development in brittle and semi brittle rock. Pergamon Press, London, 176 p

  • Priest SD, Hudson J (1981) Estimation of discontinuity spacing and trace length using scanline surveys. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 18:13–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Riedel W (1929) Zur Mechanik Geologischer Brucherscheinungen. Zentrabl Mineral Abt B 354–68

  • Robertson A (1970) The interpretation of geologic factors for use in slope theory. In: Proceedings of symposium on the theoretical background to the planning of open pit mines, Johannesburg, South Africa, pp 55–71

  • Saltzman B (2001) Possible correlation between mechanical layer’s joint spacing and its rock mechanical properties. MS thesis, Ben Gurion University of the Negev

  • Savalli L, Engelder T (2005) Mechanisms controlling rupture shape during subcritical growth of joints in layered rocks. GSA Bull 117(3/4):436–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon P (1912) Some observations and experiments on joint planes. J Geol 20:164–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song J-J (2006) Estimation of areal frequency and mean trace length of discontinuities observed in non-planar surfaces. Rock Mech Rock Eng 39(2):131–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song J-J, Lee C-I (2001) Estimation of joint length distribution using window sampling. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 38(4):519–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villaescusa E, Brown ET (1990) Maximum likelihood estimation of joint size from trace length measurements. Rock Mech Rock Eng 25:67–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warburton PM (1980a) A stereological interpretation of joint trace data. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 17:181–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warburton PM (1980b) Stereological interpretation of joint trace data: influence of joint shape and implications for geological surveys. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 17:305–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wathugala DN (1991) Stochastic three dimensional joint geometry modeling and verification. PhD dissertation, University of Arizona, Tucson

  • Weinberger R (2001) Joint nucleation in layered rocks with non-uniform distribution of cavities. J Struct Geol 23:1241–1254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodworth JB (1896) On the fracture system of joints, with remarks on certain great fractures. Boston Soc Nat Hist Proc 27:163–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L (2005) Engineering properties of rocks. Elsevier, p 304

  • Zhang L, Einstein HH (2000) Estimating the intensity of rock discontinuities. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 37:819–837

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L, Einstein HH, Dershowitz WS (2002) Stereological relationship between trace length distribution and size distribution of elliptical discontinuities. Geotechnique 52(6):419–433

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lianyang Zhang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhang, L., Einstein, H.H. The Planar Shape of Rock Joints. Rock Mech Rock Eng 43, 55–68 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-009-0054-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-009-0054-0

Keywords

Navigation