Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering

, Volume 43, Issue 1, pp 55–68 | Cite as

The Planar Shape of Rock Joints

  • Lianyang Zhang
  • Herbert H. Einstein
Original Paper


Knowing the planar shape of discontinuities is important when characterizing discontinuities in a rock mass. However, the real discontinuity shape is rarely known, since the rock mass is usually inaccessible in three dimensions. Information on discontinuity shape is limited and often open to more than one interpretation. This paper discusses the planar shape of rock joints, the most common discontinuities in rock. First, a brief literature review about the shape of joints is presented, including some information on joint-surface morphology, inferences from observed trace lengths on different sampling planes, information based on experimental studies, and joint shapes assumed by different researchers. This review shows that joints not affected by adjacent geological structures such as bedding boundaries or pre-existing fractures tend to be elliptical (or approximately circular but rarely). Joints affected by or intersecting such geological structures tend to be rectangular. Then, using the general stereological relationship between trace length distributions and joint size distributions developed by Zhang et al. (Geotechnique 52(6):419–433, 2002) for elliptical joints, the effect of sampling plane orientation on trace lengths is investigated. This study explains why the average trace lengths of non-equidimensional (elliptical or similar polygonal) joints on two sampling planes can be about equal and thus the conclusion that rock joints are equidimensional (circular) drawn from the fact that the average trace lengths on two sampling planes are approximately equal can be wrong. Finally, methods for characterizing the shape and size of joints (elliptical or rectangular) from trace length data are recommended, and the appropriateness of using elliptical joint shapes to represent polygonal, especially rectangular, joints is discussed.


Rock discontinuity Rock fracture Rock joint Planar shape Geology 


  1. Ameen MS (1995) Fractography: fracture topography as a tool in fracture mechanics and stress analysis. The Geological Society, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. Baecher GN, Lanney NA, Einstein HH (1977) Statistical description of rock properties and sampling. In: 18th US symposium on rock mechanics, 5C1-8Google Scholar
  3. Bahat D (1988) Fractographics determination of joint length distribution in chalk. Rock Mech Rock Eng 21(1):79–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bahat D, Bankwitz P, Bankwitz E (2003) Preuplift joints in granites: evidence for subcritical and postcritical fracture growth. GSA Bull 115(2):148–146Google Scholar
  5. Bankwitz P (1965) Ueber Kluefte: I. Beobachtungen im Thuringischen Schiefergebirge. Geologie 14:241–253Google Scholar
  6. Bankwitz P (1966) Ueber Kluefte: II. Die Bildung der Kluftoberflaeche und eine Systematik ihrer Strukturen. Geologie 15:896–941Google Scholar
  7. Bankwitz P (1978) Ueber Kluefte: III. Die Entstehung von Saulenkluften. Zeitschrift Geol Wissenschaften 6:285–299Google Scholar
  8. Bankwitz P, Bankwitz E (1984) Beitrag zur Interpretation von Rupturen. Zeitschrift fur Angewandte Geologie 30:265–271Google Scholar
  9. Barton CM (1977) Geotechnical analysis of rock structure and fabric in CSA Mine NSW. Applied Geomechanics Technical Paper 24, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  10. Baudo A (2001) 1-D Fractal, Geostatistical and abusing analyses of fractures along a 4 km scanline. MS thesis, The State University of New York at BuffaloGoogle Scholar
  11. Becker A, Gross MR (1996) Mechanism for joint saturation in mechanically layered rocks: an example from Southern Israel. Tectonophysics 257:223–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bridges MC (1976) Presentation of fracture data for rock mechanics. In: 2nd Australia-New Zealand conference on geomechanics, Brisbane, pp 144–148Google Scholar
  13. Chan LP (1986) Application of Block theory and simulation techniques to optimum design of rock excavations. PhD thesis, University of California, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  14. Cloos E (1955) Experimental analysis of fracture patterns. Geol Soc Am Bull 66(3):241–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Daneshy AA (1973) Three-dimensional propagation of hydraulic fractures extending from open holes. In: Application of rock mechanics—15th symposium on rock mechanics, Custer State Park, SD, pp 157–179Google Scholar
  16. Dershowitz WS (1998) Discrete feature approach for heterogeneous reservoir production enhancement. Progress Report: October 1, 1998–December 31, 1998, Golder Associates IncGoogle Scholar
  17. Dershowitz WS, Einstein HH (1988) Characterizing rock joint geometry with joint system models. Rock Mech Rock Eng 21:21–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dershowitz WS, Lee G, Geier J, Foxford T, LaPointe P, Thomas A (1993) FracMan, interactive discrete feature data analysis, geometric modeling, and exploration simulation. User documentation, Version 2.3, Golder Associates Inc., SeattleGoogle Scholar
  19. Einstein HH, Bobet A (2004) Crack coalescence in brittle materials: an overview. In: Schubert (ed) EUROCK 2004 & 53rd geomechanics colloquiumGoogle Scholar
  20. Einstein HH, Dershowitz WS (1990) Tensile and shear fracturing in predominantly compressive stress fields—a review. Eng Geol 29:149–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Einstein HH, Baecher GB, Veneziano D (1979) Risk analysis for rock slopes in open pit mines—final technical report, Parts I–V, USBM J 027 5015, Department of Civil Engineering, MIT, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  22. Gross MR, Bahat D, Becker A (1997) Relations between jointing and faulting based on fracture-spacing ratios and fault-slip profiles: a new method to estimate strain in layered rocks. Geology 25(10):887–890CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hodgson RA (1961) Classification of structures on joint surfaces. Am J Sci 259:493–502Google Scholar
  24. Hoek E (1968) Brittle fracture of rock. In: Stagg KG, Zienkiewicz OC (eds) Rock mechanics in engineering practice. Wiley, pp 99–124Google Scholar
  25. Horii H, Nemat-Nasser S (1986) Brittle failure in compression: splitting, faulting and brittle ductile transition. Phil Trans R Soc Lond Math Phys Sci 319(1549)Google Scholar
  26. ISRM (1978) Suggested methods for the quantitative description of discontinuities in rock masses. International Society for Rock Mechanics, Commission on standardization of laboratory and field tests. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 15:319–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ivanova V (1995) Three-dimensional stochastic modeling of rock fracture systems. MS thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  28. Ivanova V (1998) Geologic and stochastic modeling of fracture systems in rocks. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  29. Kulander BR, Barton CC, Dean SL (1979) The application of fractography to core and outcrop fracture investigations. U.S. Department of Energy Report METC/SP-79/3, Morgantown Energy Research Center, p 175Google Scholar
  30. Kulatilake PHSW, Wu TH, Wathugala DN (1990) Probabilistic modeling of joint orientation. Int J Num Anal Method Geomech 14:325–250Google Scholar
  31. Kulatilake PHSW, Wathugala DN, Stephansson O (1993) Stochastic three dimensional joint size, intensity and system modeling and a validation to an area in Stripa Mine, Sweden. Soils Found 33(1):55–70Google Scholar
  32. Lajtai EZ (1969) Strength of discontinuous rocks in direct shear. Geotechnique 19(2):218–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Locsin JLZ (2005) Modeling joint patterns using combinations of mechanical and probabilistic concepts. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  34. Mandl G (2005) Rock joints—the mechanical genesis. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  35. Meyer T (1999) Geologic stochastic modeling of rock fracture systems related to crustal faults. MS thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  36. Moriya H, Fujita T, Niitsuma H, Eisenblätter J, Manthei G (2006) Analysis of fracture propagation behavior using hydraulically induced acoustic emissions in the Bernburg salt mine, Germany. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 43(1):49–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Petit J-P, Massonnat G, Pueo F, Rawnsley K (1994) Rapport de forme des fractures de mode 1 dans les roches stratifiees: Une etude de cas dans le Bassin Permian de Lodeve (France). Bulletin du Centre de Recherches Elf Exploration Production 18(1):211–229Google Scholar
  38. Pollard DD, Aydin AA (1988) Progress in understanding jointing over the past century. Geol Soc Am Bull 1001:1181–1204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Price NJ (1966) Fault and joint development in brittle and semi brittle rock. Pergamon Press, London, 176 pGoogle Scholar
  40. Priest SD, Hudson J (1981) Estimation of discontinuity spacing and trace length using scanline surveys. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 18:13–197Google Scholar
  41. Riedel W (1929) Zur Mechanik Geologischer Brucherscheinungen. Zentrabl Mineral Abt B 354–68Google Scholar
  42. Robertson A (1970) The interpretation of geologic factors for use in slope theory. In: Proceedings of symposium on the theoretical background to the planning of open pit mines, Johannesburg, South Africa, pp 55–71Google Scholar
  43. Saltzman B (2001) Possible correlation between mechanical layer’s joint spacing and its rock mechanical properties. MS thesis, Ben Gurion University of the NegevGoogle Scholar
  44. Savalli L, Engelder T (2005) Mechanisms controlling rupture shape during subcritical growth of joints in layered rocks. GSA Bull 117(3/4):436–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sheldon P (1912) Some observations and experiments on joint planes. J Geol 20:164–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Song J-J (2006) Estimation of areal frequency and mean trace length of discontinuities observed in non-planar surfaces. Rock Mech Rock Eng 39(2):131–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Song J-J, Lee C-I (2001) Estimation of joint length distribution using window sampling. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 38(4):519–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Villaescusa E, Brown ET (1990) Maximum likelihood estimation of joint size from trace length measurements. Rock Mech Rock Eng 25:67–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Warburton PM (1980a) A stereological interpretation of joint trace data. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 17:181–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Warburton PM (1980b) Stereological interpretation of joint trace data: influence of joint shape and implications for geological surveys. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 17:305–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wathugala DN (1991) Stochastic three dimensional joint geometry modeling and verification. PhD dissertation, University of Arizona, TucsonGoogle Scholar
  52. Weinberger R (2001) Joint nucleation in layered rocks with non-uniform distribution of cavities. J Struct Geol 23:1241–1254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Woodworth JB (1896) On the fracture system of joints, with remarks on certain great fractures. Boston Soc Nat Hist Proc 27:163–184Google Scholar
  54. Zhang L (2005) Engineering properties of rocks. Elsevier, p 304Google Scholar
  55. Zhang L, Einstein HH (2000) Estimating the intensity of rock discontinuities. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 37:819–837CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Zhang L, Einstein HH, Dershowitz WS (2002) Stereological relationship between trace length distribution and size distribution of elliptical discontinuities. Geotechnique 52(6):419–433Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil Engineering and Engineering MechanicsUniversity of ArizonaTucsonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringMassachusetts Institute of TechnologyCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations