Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering

, Volume 42, Issue 3, pp 475–511 | Cite as

Crack Coalescence in Molded Gypsum and Carrara Marble: Part 1. Macroscopic Observations and Interpretation

Original Paper

Abstract

Cracking and coalescence behavior has been studied experimentally with prismatic laboratory-molded gypsum and Carrara marble specimens containing two parallel pre-existing open flaws. This was done at both the macroscopic and the microscopic scales, and the results are presented in two separate papers. This paper (the first of two) summarizes the macroscopic experimental results and investigates the influence of the different flaw geometries and material, on the cracking processes. In the companion paper (also in this issue), most of the macroscopic deformation and cracking processes shown in this present paper will be related to the underlying microscopic changes. In the present study, a high speed video system was used, which allowed us to precisely observe the cracking mechanisms. Nine crack coalescence categories with different crack types and trajectories were identified. The flaw inclination angle (β), the ligament length (L), that is, intact rock length between the flaws, and the bridging angle (α), that is, the inclination of a line linking up the inner flaw tips, between two flaws, had different effects on the coalescence patterns. One of the pronounced differences observed between marble and gypsum during the compression loading test was the development of macroscopic white patches prior to the initiation of macroscopic cracks in marble, but not in gypsum. Comparing the cracking and coalescence behaviors in the two tested materials, tensile cracking generally occurred more often in marble than in gypsum for the same flaw pair geometries.

Keywords

Uniaxial compressive loading test High speed camera Tensile cracks Shear cracks Crack type classification scheme 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The project is sponsored by the NSF Geomechanics and Geotechnical Systems Program under grant CMMI-0555053 and the US Department of Energy Geothermal Program under grant DE-FG36-06GO16061. The first author is also thankful to the support by the Croucher Foundation Scholarship (Hong Kong) and the Sir Edward Youde Memorial Fellowship (Hong Kong).

References

  1. Alber M, Hauptfleisch U (1999) Generation and visualization of microfractures in Carrara Marble for estimating fracture toughness, fracture shear and fracture normal stiffness. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 36(8):1065–1071CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Backers T, Dresen G, Rybacki E, Stephansson O (2004) New data on mode II fracture toughness of rock from the punchthrough shear test. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 41(3):1–6Google Scholar
  3. Bobet A (1997) Fracture coalescence in rock materials: experimental observations and numerical predictions. ScD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  4. Bobet A, Einstein HH (1998) Fracture coalescence in rock-type materials under uniaxial and biaxial compression. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 35(7):863–888CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Einstein HH, Hirschfeld RC (1973) Model studies on mechanics of jointed rocks. ASCE J Geotech Div 99:SM3Google Scholar
  6. Einstein HH, Nelson RA, Bruhn RW, Hirschfeld RC (1969) Model studies of jointed rock behavior. In: Proceedings of 11th symposium on rock mechanics, pp 83–103Google Scholar
  7. Jaeger JC, Hoskins ER (1966) Stresses and failure in rings of rock loaded in diametral tension or compression. Brit J Appl Phys 71:685–692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ko TY, Einstein HH, Kemeny J (2006) Crack coalescence in brittle material under cyclic loading. Golden rocks 2006, Proceedings of the 41st US symposium on rock mechanics (USRMS): “50 years of rock mechanics—landmarks and future challenges”, Golden, Colorado, June 17–21, ARMA/USRMS 06-930Google Scholar
  9. Li YP, Chen LZ, Wang YH (2005) Experimental research on pre-cracked marble under compression. Int J of Solids Struct 42:2505–2516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Mughieda O, Alzo’ubi AK (2004) Fracture mechanics of offset rock joints—a laboratory investigation. Geotech Geol Eng 22:545–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Reyes O, Einstein HH (1991) Failure mechanism of fractured rock—a fracture coalescence model. In: Proceedings of the 7th international congress of rock mechanics, vol 1, Aachen, Germany, pp 333–340Google Scholar
  12. Sagong M, Bobet A (2002) Coalescence of multiple flaws in a rock-model material in uniaxial compression. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 39:229–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Shen B, Stephansson O, Einstein HH, Ghahreman B (1995) Coalescence of fractures under shear stress experiments. J Geophys Res 100(6):5975–5990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Wong NY (2008) Crack coalescence in molded gypsum and Carrara Marble, Ph.D. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, p 876Google Scholar
  15. Wong RHC, Chau KT (1998) Crack coalescence in a rock-like material containing two cracks. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 35(2):147–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Wong LNY, Einstein HH (2006) Fracturing behavior of prismatic specimens containing single flaws. In: Proceedings of the 41st US symposium on rock mechanics (USRMS): “50 years of rock mechanics—landmarks and future challenges”, Golden, Colorado, ARMA/USRMS 06-899Google Scholar
  17. Wong LNY, Einstein HH (2007) Coalescence behavior in Carrara marble and molded gypsum containing artificial flaw pairs under uniaxial compression. In: Proceedings of the 1st Canada-US rock mechanics symposium, Vancouver, Canada, pp 581–589Google Scholar
  18. Wong LNY, Einstein HH Systematic evaluation of cracking behavior in specimens containing single flaws under unaxial compression. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci (accepted)Google Scholar
  19. Wong LNY, Einstein HH Crack coalescence in molded gypsum and Carrara marble: part 2—microscopic observations and interpretation. Rock Mech Rock Eng (this issue)Google Scholar
  20. Wong RHC, Chau KT, Tang CA, Lin P (2001) Analysis of crack coalescence in rock-like materials containing three flaws—part I: experimental approach. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 38:909–924CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringMassachusetts Institute of TechnologyCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations