Skip to main content
Log in

Model for Estimation of Time and Cost for Tunnel Projects Based on Risk Evaluation

  • Published:
Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary.

In the planning and procurement phases of tunnelling projects, numerous decisions have to be made regarding tender price and budget. Many case studies have shown that, in practice, the predicted costs and time schedules are often exceeded. This paper describes a study of the various risk factors in machine tunnelling and their differing impacts on cost and time. It has been concluded from the study that it is important to make a clear distinction between normal cost and time, and the undesirable events that cause exceptional cost and time. Existing decision-aid estimation models consider variation of the risk factors, but do not consider normal cost or time separately from undesirable events. Usually, estimations of project cost and time are made in a deterministic manner, but this does not allow one to consider uncertainty in cost and time variables. However, if the variables are treated probabilistically, the total cost of tunnelling can be expressed as a distribution curve, and a decision can be made on the tunnelling method by comparing the respective cost and time distributions. Based on such decisions, the budget and tender price can be determined separately, both by the client and contractor respectively. To meet the demands placed on decision-making for tender and procurement for currently favoured construction-contracting methods, a new model for estimating tender price and budget has been developed, and is described in this paper. This estimating technique has been applied to a case study of the Grauholz Tunnel. The predictions obtained from the estimation model are shown to be realistic, as the total construction cost and time obtained from the model correspond fairly well to the actual construction cost and time. The separate estimation of normal cost and time and exceptional cost and time contribute to the clarity of the results. The use of the proposed model also shows that the tunnelling method most suitable for the actual geological and hydrogeological conditions can be selected by this method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andreossi, E. M. (1998): Assessing underground tunnelling projects past and future role of reinsurers. In: Proc., Reducing Risk in Tunnel Design and Construction. 7–8 December, Basel, Switzerland, Independent Technical Conferences Ltd, Bredford, UK.

  • Ang, A. H.-S., Tang, W. H. (1984): Probability concepts in engineering planning and design, Vol. II. Decision, risk and reliability. John Wiley and Sons, New York.

  • Bell, E., Raiffa, H., Tversky, A. (1988): Decision making, descriptive, normative, and prescriptive interactions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

  • J. R. Benjamin C. A. Cornell (1970) Probability, statistics and decision for civil engineers. McGraw-Hill New York 684

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunner, J., Råsled, B., Söderberg, E. (1981): Byggstyrning-begrepp ekonomi och förvaltning. Handboken Bygg, Liber Förlag (in Swedish).

  • Chapman, C. B., Cooper, D. F., Cammaert, A. B. (1981): Model and situation specific or methods: risk engineering reliability analysis of an ing. Facility XIII- TIMS/LURO-III, Athens, July 1977.

  • C. Charoenngam C.-Y. Yeh (1999) ArticleTitleContractual risk and liability sharing in hydropower construction. Int. J. Project Management 17 IssueID1 29–37 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0263-7863(97)00064-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drees, G., Bahner, A. (1992): Kalkulation von Baupreisen, 3. neubearbeitete Aufl. Bauverlag GmbH, Wiesbaden (in German).

  • Einstein, H. H., Dudt, J.-P., Halabe, V. B., Descoeudres, F. (1996): Geologic uncertainities in tunnelling. In: Proc., Uncertainty in the Geologic Environment: from Theory to Practice.

  • Einstein, H. H., Salazar, G. F., Kim, Y. W., Ioannou, P. G. (1987): Computer Based Decision Support Systems for Underground Construction. In: Proc., RETC, Ch. 77, 1287–1307.

  • Einstein, H. H., Descoeudres, F., Dudt, J. P., Halabe, V. (1991): Entscheidungshilfen für den Tunnelbau. Schlussbericht über die im Auftrag des Bundesamtes für Verkehr ausgeführten Arbeiten (in German).

  • Einstein, H. H., Vick, S. G. (1974): Geological model for a tunnel cost model. In: Proc., 2nd, Rapid Excavation and Tunneling Conf., II, 1701–1720.

  • Harr, M. E. (1987): Reliability-based design in civil engineering. McGraw-Hill, New York.

  • Harsch, W. (1990): Geologie und Hydrogeologie des Grauholztunnels. Referate der Studientagung vom 23. August 1990 in Schönbühl, Fachgruppe für Untertagebau, SIA Dokumentation D063, Grauholztunnel (in German).

  • Health and Safety Executive (1996): Safety of New Austrian Tunnelling Method tunnels – a review of sprayed concrete lined tunnels with particular reference to London Clay. HSE Books 1996, 86.

  • Isaksson, T. (2002): Model for estimation of time and cost based on risk evaluation applied on tunnel projects. Doctoral Thesis, Division of Soil and Rock Mechanics, Dep. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden, ISSN 1650–9501.

  • Isaksson, T., Reilly, J., Anderson, J. (1999a): Risk mitigation for tunnelling projects – a structured approach. Challenges for the 21st Century, ITA Oslo, Norway.

  • Isaksson, T., Reilly, J., Anderson, J. (1999b): Mit Risikoanalyse und innovativer Projektsteuerung kostenbewuβt bauen. Unterirdisches Bauen 2000 – Herausforderungen und Entwicklungspotentiale, STUVA-Tagung in Frankfurt, Germany.

  • John, M., Wogrin, J., Heissel, G. (1987): Analyse des Verbruches im Landrückentunnel, Baulos Mitte. Felsbau 5(2) (in German).

  • Kastbjerg Skamris, M. (1994): Large transport projects – forecast versus actual traffic and costs. Master’s Thesis in International Technology Planning, Aalborg University, Denmark.

  • Kovári, K., Fechtig, R., Amstad, Ch. (1991): Erfahrungen mit Vortriebsmaschinen grossen Durchmessers in der Schweiz. STUVA-Tagung, Düsseldorf (in German).

  • Lichtenberg, S. (1990): Projekt Planlaegning – i en foranderlig verden. Polyteknisk Forlag, Denmark. (in Danish).

  • Maidl, B. (1988): Handbuch des Tunnel- und Stollenbaus Band I: Konstruktion und Verfahren: 1994, Aufl., 63–178. Band II: Grundlagen und Zusatsleistungen für Planung und Ausführung, Verlag Glückauf, Essen, 210–211 (in German).

  • Moavenzadeh, F., Markow, M. J. (1976): Simulation model for tunnel construction costs. J. Contr. Div. Am. Soc. Civ. Eng. CO1: 51–66.

  • Müller, L. (1978): Der Felsbau. Bd. 3, Tunnelbau, Salzburg. Enke, Stuttgart (in German).

  • Nilsen, B., Palmström, A., Stille, H. (1999): Quality control of a sub-sea tunnel project in complex ground conditions. In: Proc., Alten et al. (eds), Challenges for the 21st century. Balkema, Rotterdam.

  • Nelson, P. P., Al-Jalil, Y. A., Laughton, C. (1994): Tunnel boring machine project data bases and construction simulation. Geotechnical Engineering Report GR94-4, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, 78712.

  • Nylén, K.-O. (1999): Civil works – unique projects or a repeatable process? Doctoral thesis, Division of Construction Management and Economics, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.

  • Olsson, L. (1986): Tillämpning av β-metoden inom Geotekniken – Illustrerad med spontberäkning Doctoral Thesis, Royal Institute of Technology, Dep. of soil and Rock Mechanics, Stockholm (in Swedish).

  • Platz, M. (1991): Problem der Bauzeitprognose bei konventionellen Vortrieben. Sicherheit und Risiken bei Untertagebauwerken. ETH-Symposium, 21/22 März 1991, Zürich (in German).

  • Quellmelz, F. (1987): Die Neue Österreichische Tunnelbauweise – Technische und wirtschaftliche Einsatzkriterien für ausgewählte Betriebsmittel, Sicherungselemente und Bauverfahren. Bauverlag GmbH, Wiesbaden (in German).

  • Rausand, M. (1991): Risiko Analyse. Veiledning til NS 5814, Tapir forlag. (in Norwegian).

  • Reilly, J., Isaksson, T., Anderson, J. (1999): Tunnel procurement process – management issues and risk mitigation – getting it right from the beginning – policy, management, procurement, risk evaluation and decision methodologies for optimal results. 10th Australian Tunnelling Conference: The Race for Space, Melbourne, March’99.

  • RRV (1994): Infrastrukturinvesteringar – en kostnadsjämförelse mellan plan och utfall i 15 större projekt inom Vägverket och Banverket Riksrevisionsverket 1994:23.

  • Rohrer, U. (1994): Überlegungen des Unternehmers in der Offertphase. Referate der Studientagung vom 26. Mai 1994 in Schönbühl Fachgruppe für Untertagebau, SIA Dokumentation D0116, Grauholztunnel II.

  • Salazar, G. F. (1983): Stochastic and economic evaluation of adaptability in tunneling design and construction. Doctoral Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.

  • Salazar, G. F. (1985): Simulation model for tunneling through difficult ground conditions. Department of Civil Engineering, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, Massachusetts.

  • Stille, H., Sturk, R., Olsson, L. (1998): Quality systems and risk analysis – new philosophies in underground construction industry. In: Proc., Inter. Conf. on Underground Construction in Modern Infrastructure, Stockholm, Sweden, 7–9 June 1998, AA Balkema, Rotterdam.

  • Tengborg, P., Olsson, L., Johansson, J., Brantmark, J. (1998): Systemanalys för Hvalfjördurtunneln. Bergsprängningskommitténs diskussionsmöte i Stockholm, 11 mars 1997 (in Swedish).

  • Thoft-Christensen, P., Baker, M. J. (1982): Structural reliability theory and its applications. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, Tokyo.

  • Vanmarcke, E. H. (1977): Probabilistic modeling of soil profiles. J Geotechn Engng. ASCE 103, GT 11, Nov 1977.

  • Wallis, S. (1993): Storebaelt Review. World Tunnelling, April 1993.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Isaksson, T., Stille, H. Model for Estimation of Time and Cost for Tunnel Projects Based on Risk Evaluation. Rock Mech. Rock Engng. 38, 373–398 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-005-0048-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-005-0048-5

Navigation