Abstract
In the context of the Dunkl derivative, we present the Dunkl–Duffin–Kemmer–Petiau oscillator (DDKPO) model of spin 0 and 1. For the spin 0 case , the exact solutions are determined, the wave functions are obtained using Cartesian and polar coordinates in the general form for the different eigenvalues of the reflection operators, and the corresponding spectrum energies are deduced. For the spin 1 case, the problem is complicated by the direct method, we obtain a differential equation of order four and we limit ourselves only to the study of the non-relativistic case.
Similar content being viewed by others
Change history
03 June 2022
A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00601-022-01753-1
References
M. Moshinsky, A. Szczepaniak, The Dirac oscillator. J. Phys. A 22, L817 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/22/17/002
J. Beckers, N. Debergha, A.G. Nikitin, On pararelativistic quantum oscillators. J. Math. Phys 33, 3387 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.529886
Y. Nedjadi, R.C. Barrett, The Duffin–Kemmer–Petiau oscillator. J. Phys. A Math. Gen. 27, 4301 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/27/12/033
Y. Nedjadi, R.C. Barrett, A generalized Duffin–Kemmer–Petiau oscillator. J. Phys. A Math. Gen. 31, 6717 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/31/31/016
Y. Nedjadi, S. Ait-Tahar, R.C. Barrett, An extended relativistic quantum oscillator for particles. J. Phys. A Math. Gen. 31, 3867 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/31/16/014
D.A. Kulikov, R.S. Tutik, A.P. Yaroshenko, An alternative model for the Duffin–Kemmer–Petiau oscillator. Mod. Phys. Lett A 26, 12 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217732305016324
V.V. Dvoeglazov, A.S. del Mesa, Notes on oscillator-like interactions of various spin relativistic particles, in NASA Conference Publication, vol. 3286, p. 333 (1994)
I. Boztosun, M. Karakoc, F. Yasuk, A. Durmus, Asymptotic iteration method solutions to the relativistic Duffin–Kemmer–Petiau equation. J. Math. Phys. 47, 062301 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2203429
H. Chen, Z.W. Long, Y. Yang, Z.L. Zhao, C.Y. Lo, The study of the generalized boson oscillator in a chiral conical space time. Int. J. Mod. Phys A. 35, 2050107 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217751X20501079
M. Falek, M. Merad, DKP oscillator in a noncommutative space. Commun. Theor. Phys. 50, 587 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1088/0253-6102/50/3/10
Z. Wang, Z.W. Long, C.Y. Long, W. Zhang, On the thermodynamic properties of the spinless Duffin–Kemmer–Petiau oscillator in noncommutative plane. Adv. High. Energy Phys. Article ID 901675 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/901675
M. Falek, M. Merad, Bosonic oscillator in the presence of minimal length. J. Math. Phys 50, 023508 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3076900
M. Falek, M. Merad, A generalized bosonic oscillator in the presence of a minimal length. J. Math. Phys 51, 033516 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3326236
H. Chen, Z.W. Long, Z.L. Zhao, C.Y. Long, Effects of generalized uncertainty principle on the (1+1)Dimensional DKP oscillator with linear potential. Few Body Syst. 61, 11 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00601-020-1542-8
S.R. Wu, Z.W. Long, C.Y. Long, B.Q. Wang, Y. Liu, Effects of generalized uncertainty principle on the two-dimensional DKP oscillator. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 132, 186 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/i2017-11447-3
M. Falek, M. Merad, T. Birkandan, Duffin–Kemmer–Petiau oscillator with Snyder-de Sitter algebra. J. Math. Phys. 58, 023501 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4975137
M. Falek, M. Merad, M. Moumni, Bosonic oscillator under a uniform magnetic field with Snyder–de Sitter algebra. J. Math. Phys. 60, 013505 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5043472
M. Hosseinpour, H. Hassanabadi, F.M. Andrade, The DKP oscillator with a linear interaction in the cosmic string space–time. Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 93 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-5574-x
B.-Q. Wang, Z.-W. Long, C.-Y. Long, S.-R. Wu, Solution of the spin-one DKP oscillator under an external magnetic field in noncommutative space with minimal length. Chin. Phys. B 27, 010301 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-1056/27/1/010301
A. Boumali, N. Messai, Exact solutions of a two-dimensional Duffin–Kemmer–Petiau oscillator subject to a Coulomb potential in the gravitational field of cosmic string. Can. J. Phys 95, 999 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1139/cjp-2016-0800
Y. Chargui, On the Duffin–Kemmer–Petiau equation with linear potential in the presence of a minimal length. Phys. Lett. A 382, 949 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2018.02.008
B. Hamil, M. Merad, T. Birkandan, Phys. Scr. 95, 075309 (2020)
M. Hadj Moussa, M. Merad, A. Merad, Bosonic oscillator on the de Sitter and the Anti-de Sitter spaces. Few Body Syst. 60, 53 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00601-019-1522-z
L.M. Yang, A note on the quantum rule of the harmonic oscillator. Phys. Rev. 84, 788 (1951). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.84.788
C.F. Dunkl, Differential-difference operators associated to reflection groups. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 311, 167 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9947-1989-0951883-8
M. Rösler, Dunkl operators: theory and applications, in Orthogonal Polynomials and Special Functions Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 1817, ed. by E. Koelink, W. Van Assche (Springer, Berlin, 2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44945-0_3
L. Lapointe, L. Vinet, Exact operator solution of the Calogero–Sutherland model. Commun. Math. Phys. 178(2), 425 (1996)
A. Kempf, J. Math. Phys. 35, 4483 (1994)
F.H. Stillinger, J. Math. Phys. 18, 1224–1234 (1977)
M. Zubair, M. Mughal, Q.A. Naqvi, Electromagnetic Fields and Waves in Fractional Dimensional Space (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2012). ISBN 978-3-642-25358-4
V.X. Genest, L. Vinet, A. Zhedanov, The singular and the 2:1 anisotropic Dunkl oscillators in the plane. J. Phys. A Math. Theor. 46, 325201 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/46/32/325201
V.X. Genest, M.E.H. Ismail, L. Vinet, A. Zhedanov, The Dunkl oscillator in the plane: I. Superintegrability, separated wavefunctions and overlap coefficients. J. Phys. A Math. Theor. 46, 145201 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/46/14/145201
V.X. Genest, M.E.H. Ismail, L. Vinet, A. Zhedanov, The Dunkl oscillator in the plane II: representations of the symmetry algebra. Commun. Math. Phys. 329, 999 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-014-1915-2
V.X. Genest, A. Lapointe, L. Vinet, The Dunkl–Coulomb problem in the plane. Phys. Lett. A 379, 923 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2015.01.023
V.X. Genest, L. Vinet, A. Zhedanov, The Dunkl oscillator in three dimensions. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 512, 012010 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/512/1/012010
R.D. Mota, D. Ojeda-Guillén, M. Salazar-Ramırez, V.D. Granados, Exact solution of the relativistic Dunkl oscillator \(\left(2+1\right) \) in dimensions. Ann. Phys. 411, 167964 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aop.2019.167964
W.S. Chung, H. Hassanabadi, One-dimensional quantum mechanics with Dunkl derivative. Mod. Phys. Lett. A 34, 1950190 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217732319501906
L. Chetouani, M. Merad, T. Boudjedaa, A. Lecheheb, Solution of Duffin–Kemmer–Petiau equation for the step potential. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 43, 1147 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:IJTP.0000048606.29712.13
M. Merad, H. Bada, A. Lecheheb, DKP particle in time-dependent field. Czech. J. Phys. 56, 765 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10582-006-0129-z
J.M. Jauch, E.L. Hill, On the problem of degeneracy in quantum mechanics. Phys. Rev. 57, 641–645 (1940). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.57.641
V.A. Dulock, H.V. McIntosh, On the degeneracy of the two-dimensional harmonic oscillator. Am. J. Phys. 33, 109 (1965). https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1971258
Acknowledgements
We wish to thank the referees for their useful comments which greatly improved the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
We expose an explicit representation of \(\beta ^{\mu }\) matrices ,
-
For the case of spin 0, the form of the \(\beta ^{\mu }\) is given by
$$\begin{aligned} \beta ^{0}=\left( \begin{array} [c]{ll} \theta &{} \quad \mathbf {0}\\ \mathbf {0} &{} \quad \mathbf {0} \end{array} \right) ,\ \text {and }\ \ \beta ^{i}=\left( \begin{array} [c]{ll} \mathbf {0} &{} \quad \rho ^{i}\\ -\rho _{T}^{i} &{} \quad \mathbf {0} \end{array} \right) ,i=1,2,3 \end{aligned}$$(63)where
$$\begin{aligned} \ \ \theta =\left( \begin{array} [c]{ll} 0 &{} \quad 1\\ 1 &{} \quad 0 \end{array} \right) \end{aligned}$$(64)and
$$\begin{aligned} \rho ^{1}=\left( \begin{array} [c]{ccc} -1 &{} \quad 0 &{} \quad 0\\ 0 &{} \quad 0 &{} \quad 0 \end{array} \right) ,\rho ^{2}=\left( \begin{array} [c]{ccc} 0 &{} -1 &{} 0\\ 0 &{} 0 &{} 0 \end{array} \right) ,\rho ^{3}=\left( \begin{array} [c]{ccc} 0 &{} \quad 0 &{} \quad -1\\ 0 &{} \quad 0 &{} \quad 0 \end{array} \right) \end{aligned}$$(65)with \(\rho _{T}\) denotes the transposed matrix of \(\rho \) and \(\mathbf {0}\) is the zero matrix.
-
For the case of spin 1, the form of the \(\beta ^{\mu }\) is given as
$$\begin{aligned} \beta ^{0}=\left( \begin{array} [c]{cccc} 0 &{} \quad \overline{0} &{} \quad \overline{0} &{} \quad \overline{0}\\ \overline{0}^{T} &{} \quad \mathbf {0} &{} \quad \mathbf {1} &{} \quad \mathbf {0}\\ \overline{0}^{T} &{} \quad \mathbf {1} &{} \quad \mathbf {0} &{} \quad \mathbf {0}\\ \overline{0}^{T} &{} \quad \mathbf {0} &{} \quad \mathbf {0} &{} \quad \mathbf {0} \end{array} \right) \text { and }\ \ \beta ^{i}=\left( \begin{array} [c]{cccc} 0 &{} \quad \overline{0} &{} \quad e_{i} &{} \quad \overline{0}\\ \overline{0}^{T} &{} \quad \mathbf {0} &{} \quad \mathbf {0} &{} -is_{i}\\ -e_{i}^{T} &{} \quad \mathbf {0} &{} \quad \mathbf {0} &{} \quad \mathbf {0}\\ \overline{0}^{T} &{} \quad -is_{i} &{} \quad \mathbf {0} &{} \quad \mathbf {0} \end{array} \right) i=1,2,3 \end{aligned}$$(66)where the matrices \(s_{i}\) are the standard \((3\times 3)\) spin 1 matrices and, \(\mathbf {0}\) and \(\mathbf {1}\) denote respectively the zero matrix and the unity matrix. The matrices \(\overline{0}\) and \(e_{i}\) are given as
$$\begin{aligned} \overline{0}=\left( \begin{array} [c]{ccc} 0&\quad 0&\quad 0 \end{array} \right) ,e_{1}=\left( \begin{array} [c]{ccc} 1&\quad 0&\quad 0 \end{array} \right) ,e_{2}=\left( \begin{array} [c]{ccc} 0&\quad 1&\quad 0 \end{array} \right) \text { and }e_{3}=\left( \begin{array} [c]{ccc} 0&\quad 0&\quad 1 \end{array} \right) . \end{aligned}$$(67)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Merad, A., Merad, M. The Dunkl–Duffin–Kemmer–Petiau Oscillator. Few-Body Syst 62, 98 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00601-021-01683-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00601-021-01683-4