Abstract
Detailed predictions for the scaled pion–photon transition form factor are given, derived with the method of light-cone sum rules and using pion distribution amplitudes with two and three Gegenbauer coefficients obtained from QCD sum rules with nonlocal condensates. These predictions agree well with all experimental data that are compatible with QCD scaling (and collinear factorization), but disagree with the high-Q 2 data of the BaBar Collaboration that grow with the momentum. A good agreement of our predictions with results obtained from AdS/QCD models and Dyson–Schwinger computations is found.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Lepage G.P., Brodsky S.J.: Exclusive processes in perturbative quantum chromodynamics. Phys. Rev. D 22, 2157 (1980)
Brodsky S.J., Lepage G.P.: Large angle two photon exclusive channels in quantum chromodynamics. Phys. Rev. D 24, 1808 (1981)
Efremov A.V., Radyushkin A.V.: Asymptotical behavior of pion electromagnetic form factor in QCD. Theor. Math. Phys. 42, 97 (1980)
Bakulev A.P., Mikhailov S.V., Stefanis N.G.: Unbiased analysis of CLEO data beyond LO and pion distribution amplitude. Phys. Rev. D 67, 074012 (2003)
Bakulev A.P., Mikhailov S.V., Stefanis N.G.: CLEO and E791 data: a smoking gun for the pion distribution amplitude?. Phys. Lett. B 578, 91 (2004)
Bakulev A.P., Mikhailov S.V., Stefanis N.G.: Tagging the pion quark structure in QCD. Phys. Rev. D 73, 056002 (2006)
Bakulev A.P., Mikhailov S.V., Pimikov A.V., Stefanis N.G.: Pion–photon transition: the new QCD frontier. Phys. Rev. D 84, 034014 (2011)
Bakulev A.P., Mikhailov S.V., Pimikov A.V., Stefanis N.G.: Comparing antithetic trends of data for the pion–photon transition form factor. Phys. Rev. D 86, 031501 (2012)
Stefanis N.G., Bakulev A.P., Mikhailov S.V., Pimikov A.V.: Can we understand an auxetic pion–photon transition form factor within QCD?. Phys. Rev. D 87, 094025 (2013)
Khodjamirian A.: Form factors of γ*ρ → π and γ*γ → π 0 transitions and light-cone sum rules. Eur. Phys. J. C 6, 477 (1999)
Schmedding A., Yakovlev O.: Perturbative effects in the form factor γ γ* → π 0 and extraction of the pion wave function from CLEO data. Phys. Rev. D 62, 116002 (2000)
Balitsky I.I., Braun V.M., Kolesnichenko A.V.: Radiative decay sigma+ → p gamma in quantum chromodynamics. Nucl. Phys. B 312, 509 (1989)
Behrend H.J. et al.: A measurement of the \({\pi^0, \; \eta}\) and \({\eta'}\) electromagnetic form-factors. Z. Phys. C 49, 401 (1991)
Gronberg J. et al.: Measurements of the meson photon transition form factors of light pseudoscalar mesons at large momentum transfer. Phys. Rev. D 57, 33 (1998)
Aubert B. et al.: Measurement of the γ γ* → π 0 transition form factor. Phys. Rev. D 80, 052002 (2009)
Uehara S. et al.: Measurement of γ γ* → π 0 transition form factor at Belle. Phys. Rev. D 86, 092007 (2012)
delAmo Sanchez P. et al.: Measurement of the \({\gamma\gamma^{*} \to \eta}\) and \({\gamma\gamma^{*} \to \eta'}\) transition form factors. Phys. Rev. D 84, 052001 (2011)
Mikhailov S.V., Stefanis N.G.: Transition form factors of the pion in light-cone QCD sum rules with next-to-next-to-leading order contributions. Nucl. Phys. B 821, 291 (2009)
Efremov A.V., Radyushkin A.V.: Factorization and asymptotic behaviour of pion form factor in QCD. Phys. Lett. B 94, 245 (1980)
Bakulev A.P., Mikhailov S.V., Stefanis N.G.: QCD-based pion distribution amplitudes confronting experimental data. Phys. Lett. B 508, 279 (2001)
Mikhailov S.V., Radyushkin A.V.: Nonlocal condensates and QCD sum rules for pion wave function. JETP Lett. 43, 712 (1986)
Mikhailov S.V., Radyushkin A.V.: Quark condensate nonlocality and pion wave function in QCD. Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 49, 494 (1989)
Mikhailov S.V., Radyushkin A.V.: The pion wave function and QCD sum rules with nonlocal condensates. Phys. Rev. D 45, 1754 (1992)
Stefanis N.G., Schroers W., Kim H.C.: Pion form factors with improved infrared factorization. Phys. Lett. B 449, 299 (1999)
Stefanis N.G., Schroers W., Kim H.C.: Analytic coupling and Sudakov effects in exclusive processes: Pion and γ*γ → π 0 form factors. Eur. Phys. J. C 18, 137 (2000)
Agaev S.S., Braun V.M., Offen N., Porkert F.A.: Light cone sum rules for the π 0 γ*γ form factor revisited. Phys. Rev. D 83, 054020 (2011)
Agaev S., Braun V., Offen N., Porkert F.: BELLE data on the π 0 γ*γ form factor: a game changer?. Phys. Rev. D 86, 077504 (2012)
Brodsky S.J., Cao F.G., de Teramond G.F.: Evolved QCD predictions for the meson-photon transition form factors. Phys. Rev. D 84, 033001 (2011)
Chang L., Cloet I., Cobos-Martinez J., Roberts C., Schmidt S. et al.: Imaging dynamical chiral symmetry breaking: pion wave function on the light front. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 132001 (2013)
Kochelev N., Vento V.: Gluonic components of the pion and the transition form factor γ*γ* → π 0. Phys. Rev. D 81, 034009 (2010)
Noguera S., Vento V.: Model analysis of the world data on the pion transition form factor. Eur. Phys. J. A 48, 143 (2012)
Dorokhov A., Kuraev E.: Pion transition form factor in the constituent quark model. Phys. Rev. D 88, 014038 (2013)
Kroll P.: The form factors for the photon to pseudoscalar meson transitions: an update. Eur. Phys. J. C 71, 1623 (2011)
Li H.N., Shen Y.L., Wang Y.M.: Joint resummation for pion wave function and pion transition form factor. JHEP 1401, 004 (2014)
Brodsky, S.J., de Teramond, G.F., Dosch, H.G.: QCD on the light-front: a systematic approach to hadron physics (2013)
Cloet, I.C., Roberts, C.D.: Explanation and Prediction of observables using continuum strong QCD. arXiv:1310.2651 (2013)
El-Bennich B., de Melo J., Frederico T.: A combined study of the pion’s static properties and form factors. Few Body Syst. 54, 1851 (2013)
de Melo, J., El-Bennich, B., Frederico, T.: The photon-pion transition form factor: incompatible data or incompatible models? arXiv:1312.6133
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mikhailov, S.V., Pimikov, A.V. & Stefanis, N.G. Theoretical Description and Measurement of the Pion–Photon Transition Form Factor. Few-Body Syst 55, 367–372 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00601-014-0849-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00601-014-0849-8