Skip to main content
Log in

The impact of lymphangiograpy on chyle leakage treatment duration after pancreatic surgery

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgery Today Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Chyle leakage (CL) is a common complication in pancreatic surgery. Lymphangiography is a therapeutic option for CL in cases of conservative treatment failure. This study investigated the effect of lymphangiography on the healing time of CL.

Methods

We retrospectively evaluated 283 patients who underwent pancreatic resection between January 2016 and June 2022. The risk factors for CL and the treatment period were evaluated according to whether or not lymphangiography was performed.

Results

Of the 29 patients (10.2%) that had CL, lymphangiography was performed in 6. Malignant disease, the number of harvested lymph nodes, and drain fluid volume on postoperative day 2 were identified as independent risk factors for CL. Lymphangiography was associated with the cumulative healing rate of CL, and patients who underwent lymphangiography had a significantly shorter treatment period. No lymphangiography-related adverse events were observed.

Conclusion

Lymphangiography is a feasible and safe treatment option for CL. The CL treatment period after pancreatic surgery was significantly shorter in patients who underwent lymphangiography than in those who did not. Our results suggest that lymphangiography may contribute to early improvement of persistent CL.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hidalgo M. Pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:1605–17. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra0901557.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sánchez-Velázquez P, Muller X, Malleo G, Park JS, Hwang HK, Napoli N, et al. Benchmarks in pancreatic surgery: a novel tool for unbiased outcome comparisons. Ann Surg. 2019;270:211–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003223.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Abu Hilal M, Layfield DM, Di Fabio F, Arregui-Fresneda I, Panagiotopoulou IG, Armstrong TH, et al. Postoperative chyle leak after major pancreatic resections in patients who receive enteral feed: risk factors and management options. World J Surg. 2013;37:2918–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-2171-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Furukawa A, Furukawa K, Suzuki D, Yoshitomi H, Takayashiki T, Kuboki S, et al. Effect of immunonutrition on infectious complications in low skeletal muscle mass patients after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Clin Nutr. 2021;40:103–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2020.04.032.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Assumpcao L, Cameron JL, Wolfgang CL, Edil B, Choti MA, Herman JM, et al. Incidence and management of chyle leaks following pancreatic resection: a high volume single-center institutional experience. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008;12:1915–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-008-0619-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tabchouri N, Frampas E, Marques F, Blanchard C, Jirka A, Regenet N. Chylous ascites management after pancreatic surgery. World J Surg. 2017;41:1054–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-016-3772-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Heckler M, Mihaljevic AL, Winter D, Zhou Z, Liu B, Tanaka M, et al. Escherichia coli Bacterobilia is associated with severe postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2020;24:1802–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-019-04325-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen Z, Zhang Z, Lin B, Feng W, Meng F, Shi X. Relationship between early oral intake post pancreaticoduodenectomy and chyle leakage: a retrospective cohort study. J Invest Surg. 2021;34:575–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941939.2019.1663378.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Paiella S, De Pastena M, Casciani F, Pan TL, Bogoni S, Andrianello S, et al. Chyle leak after pancreatic surgery: validation of the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery classification. Surgery. 2018;164:450–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2018.05.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Strobel O, Brangs S, Hinz U, Pausch T, Hüttner FJ, Diener MK, et al. Incidence, risk factors and clinical implications of chyle leak after pancreatic surgery. Br J Surg. 2017;104:108–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.10316.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bhardwaj R, Vaziri H, Gautam A, Ballesteros E, Karimeddini D, Wu GY. Chylous ascites: a review of pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment. J Clin Transl Hepatol. 2018;6:105–13. https://doi.org/10.14218/JCTH.2017.00035.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Klotz R, Kuner C, Pan F, Feißt M, Hinz U, Ramouz A, et al. Therapeutic lymphography for persistent chyle leak after pancreatic surgery. HPB (Oxf). 2022;24:616–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2021.09.019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Besselink MG, van Rijssen LB, Bassi C, Dervenis C, Montorsi M, Adham M, et al. Definition and classification of chyle leak after pancreatic operation: a consensus statement by the International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery. Surgery. 2017;161:365–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2016.06.058.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kuboki S, Shimizu H, Yoshidome H, Ohtsuka M, Kato A, Yoshitomi H, et al. Chylous ascites after hepatopancreatobiliary surgery. Br J Surg. 2013;100:522–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9013.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Morón FE, Szklaruk J. Learning the nodal stations in the abdomen. Br J Radiol. 2007;80:841–8. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/64292252.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Loukas M, Wartmann CT, Louis RG, Tubbs RS, Salter EG, Gupta AA, et al. Cisterna chyli: a detailed anatomic investigation. Clin Anat. 2007;20:683–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.20485.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. van der Gaag NA, Verhaar AC, Haverkort EB, Busch OR, van Gulik TM, Gouma DJ. Chylous ascites after pancreaticoduodenectomy: introduction of a grading system. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;207:751–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.07.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Shyr BU, Shyr BS, Chen SC, Shyr YM, Wang SE. Chyle leakage after robotic and open pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Hepatob Pancreat Sci. 2020;27:273–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Varghese C, Wells CI, Lee S, Pathak S, Siriwardena AK, Pandanaboyana S. Systematic review of the incidence and risk factors for chyle leak after pancreatic surgery. Surgery. 2022;171:490–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2021.07.021.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Scholten L, Latenstein AEJ, van Eijck C, Erdmann J, van der Harst E, Mieog JSD, et al. Outcome and long-term quality of life after total pancreatectomy (PANORAMA): a nationwide cohort study. Surgery. 2019;166:1017–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2019.07.025.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sakamoto T, Okui N, Suzuki F, Hamura R, Shirai Y, Haruki K, et al. Daily triglyceride output volume as an early predictor for chyle leak following pancreaticoduodenectomy. In Vivo. 2021;35:1271–6. https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.12378.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Vailas M, Sotiropoulou M, Benetatos N, Mulita F, Maroulis I, Germanos S. Chyle leak after major pancreatic surgery. Is this an underestimated complication? A narrative review of the literature. J Buon. 2021;26:1747–53.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sommer CM, Pieper CC, Itkin M, Nadolski GJ, Hur S, Kim J, et al. Conventional lymphangiography (CL) in the management of postoperative lymphatic leakage (PLL): a systematic review. RöFo. 2020;192:1025–35. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1131-7889.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kortes N, Radeleff B, Sommer CM, Bellemann N, Ott K, Richter GM, et al. Therapeutic lymphangiography and CT-guided sclerotherapy for the treatment of refractory lymphatic leakage. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2014;25:127–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2013.10.011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.com) for the English language editing.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Norifumi Harimoto.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Approval of the research protocol

The protocol for this research project has been approved by the Institutional Review Board of Gunma University.

Informed consent

This retrospective observational study used an opt-out approach.

Registry and Registration No. in the HS2022-191 study/trial.

Animal studies

Not applicable.

Research involving recombinant DNA

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ishii, N., Harimoto, N., Seki, T. et al. The impact of lymphangiograpy on chyle leakage treatment duration after pancreatic surgery. Surg Today 54, 651–657 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-023-02777-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-023-02777-8

Keywords

Navigation