Skip to main content
Log in

“Role-sharing surgery”: a new surgical education system that gives beginner surgeons more chances to operate while ensuring the surgical quality of robotic surgery

  • How To Do It
  • Published:
Surgery Today Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It has been pointed out that robotic surgery is more time-consuming than laparoscopic surgery, and a major challenge for the future is educating young surgeons while maintaining the surgical quality. To solve these problems, we report a role-sharing surgery (RSS) approach in which the surgery is divided into several areas and timetabled, with roles shared by several operators. We performed RSS for 19 standard colorectal cancer surgeries. The surgery was completed within + 28 min of the scheduled operation time, and a beginner robotic surgeon (BRS) was able to perform approximately 66% of the total surgery. There were no statistically significant differences in the short-term outcomes between the RSS and conventional surgery groups. Based on these findings, RSS has the potential to be the best practice for educating BRSs in robotic surgery, the use of which is expected to increase steadily in the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Jayne D, Pigazzi A, Marshall H, Croft J, Corrigan N, Copeland J, et al. Effect of robotic-assisted vs conventional laparoscopic surgery on risk of conversion to open laparotomy among patients undergoing resection for rectal cancer: the ROLARR randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2017;318:1569–80.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Prete FP, Pezzolla A, Prete F, Testini M, Marzaioli R, Patriti A, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann Surg. 2018;267:1034–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Schonburg S, Anheuser P, Kranz J, Fornara P, Oubaid V. Cognitive training for robotic surgery: a chance to optimize surgical training? A pilot study J Robot Surg. 2021;15:761–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Costello DM, Huntington I, Burke G, Farrugia B, O’Connor AJ, Costello AJ, et al. A review of simulation training and new 3D computer-generated synthetic organs for robotic surgery education. J Robot Surg. 2022;16:749–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen R, Rodrigues Armijo P, Krause C, Force SRT, Siu KC, Oleynikov D. A comprehensive review of robotic surgery curriculum and training for residents, fellows, and postgraduate surgical education. Surg Endosc. 2020;34:361–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fujimura T, Menon M, Fukuhara H, Kume H, Suzuki M, Yamada Y, et al. Validation of an educational program balancing surgeon training and surgical quality control during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Int J Urol. 2016;23:160–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study did not require funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hajime Ushigome.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethical approval, consent to participate, and consent to publication

The study protocol was approved by the institutional review board (No. 60-19-0150). Written informed consent was waived due to the retrospective design.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ushigome, H., Takahashi, H., Harata, S. et al. “Role-sharing surgery”: a new surgical education system that gives beginner surgeons more chances to operate while ensuring the surgical quality of robotic surgery. Surg Today 54, 282–287 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-023-02749-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-023-02749-y

Keywords

Navigation