Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Immediate breast reconstruction with laparoscopically harvested omental flap: A retrospective analysis with a maximum 12-year follow-up

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgery Today Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the clinical efficacy of immediate breast reconstruction with free or pedicled laparoscopically harvested omental flaps (LHOFs).

Methods

Between March 2011 and 2021, 82 patients who underwent immediate breast reconstruction with free or pediculated omental flaps were enrolled. Breast total or partial mastectomy, laparoscopic greater omentum harvest, and breast reconstruction were carried out in an orderly manner. Postoperative operative results, cosmetic outcomes, and complications were investigated.

Results

Seventeen cases of free LHOF and 65 cases of pedicled LHOF were performed. Cosmetic results were mostly satisfactory (61% excellent, 35% good), with a soft breast that was natural in appearance. Satisfaction investigation showed that 96.2% of patients were satisfied with the reconstructed breast. Uneventful follow-up showed no abdominal complications at the donor site, and the surface skin displayed no swelling. No major complications were found, except for three cases of necrosis. One patient developed slight hematoma. Two patients were found to have local recurrence, and one had distant metastasis. Twenty-four patients accepted radiotherapy, but no size reduction was noted after radiotherapy. We followed the patients to determine their survival status. All patients were alive, except for 1 in the free LHOF group who died 31.2 months after surgery.

Conclusion

Immediate breast reconstruction with LHOF provides a soft reconstructed breast with relatively little donor-site deformity and is useful for breast tumor-specific immediate reconstruction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sakorafas GH, Safioleas M. Breast cancer surgery: an historical narrative. Part III. From the sunset of the 19th to the dawn of the 21st century. Eur J Cancer Care. 2010;19:145–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Losken A, Carlson GW, Bostwick J, Jones GE, Culbertson JH, Schoemann M. Trends in unilateral breast reconstruction and management of the contralateral breast: the Emory experience. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;110:89–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Recht A, Edge SB, Solin LJ, Robinson DS, Estabrook A, Fine RE, et al. Postmastectomy radiotherapy: clinical practice guidelines of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19:1539–69.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Zaha H, Inamine S, Naito T, Nomura H. Laparoscopically harvested omental flap for immediate breast reconstruction. Am J Surg. 2006;192:556–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kaya B, Serel S. Breast reconstruction. Exp Oncol. 2013;35:280–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Sigurdson L, Lalonde DH. MOC-PSSM CME article: breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;121:1–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Costanzo D, Klinger M. The evolution of autologous breast reconstruction. Breast J. 2020;26:2223–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Li N, Zheng Z, Li J, Fan J, Wang T, Zhang J, et al. Immediate breast reconstruction with omental flap for luminal breast cancer patients: ten clinical case reports. Medicine. 2017;96: e7797.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Li M, Shi Y, Li Q, Guo X, Han X, Li F. Oncological safety of autologous fFat grafting in breast reconstruction: a meta-analysis based on matched cohort studies. Aesth Plast Surg. 2022;46:1189–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. van Alphen TC, Fechner MR, Smit JM, Slooter GD, Broekhuysen CL. The laparoscopically harvested omentum as a free flap for autologous breast reconstruction. Microsurgery. 2017;37:539–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Craggs B, Vanmierlo B, Zeltzer A, Buyl R, Haentjens P, Hamdi M. Donor-site morbidity following harvest of the transverse myocutaneous gracilis flap for breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;134:682e–91e.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Pinell-White XA, Kapadia SM, Losken A. The management of abdominal contour defects following TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Aesth Surg J. 2014;34:264–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Nelson JA, Chung CU, Fischer JP, Kanchwala SK, Serletti JM, Wu LC. Wound healing complications after autologous breast reconstruction: a model to predict risk. J Plast Reconstr Aesth Surg. 2015;68:531–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Olsen MA, Lefta M, Dietz JR, Brandt KE, Aft R, Matthews R, et al. Risk factors for surgical site infection after major breast operation. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;207:326–35.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Nykiel M, Sayid Z, Wong R, Lee GK. Management of mastectomy skin flap necrosis in autologous breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2014;72(Suppl 1):S31-34.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhu H, Xie Y, Xie F, Gu B, Liu K, Zan T, et al. Prevention of necrosis of adjacent expanded flaps by surgical delay. Ann Plast Surg. 2014;73:525–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Sui M, Zhang L, Yang J, Zeng L, Zhao W, Zhu Y. A new HC-A II solution for kidney preservation: a multi-center randomized controlled trial in China. Ann Transplant. 2014;19:614–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Shimada Y, Okumura T, Nagata T, Sawada S, Matsui K, Hori R, et al. Usefulness of blood supply visualization by indocyanine green fluorescence for reconstruction during esophagectomy. Esophagus. 2011;8:259–66.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Lomonte C, Meola M, Petrucci I, Casucci F, Basile C. The key role of color Doppler ultrasound in the work-up of hemodialysis vascular access. Semin Dial. 2015;28:211–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by The National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81472598).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Nanlin Li or Xiaoqiang Yu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shen, G., Yang, Y., Huang, M. et al. Immediate breast reconstruction with laparoscopically harvested omental flap: A retrospective analysis with a maximum 12-year follow-up. Surg Today 54, 186–194 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-023-02718-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-023-02718-5

Keywords

Navigation