Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Oncoplastic breast surgery to prevent “Bird’s beak” deformity in the breast: a comparative retrospective study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgery Today Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purposes

Breast deformity occurring in the lower pole after breast conserving surgery (BCS) is known as bird’s beak (BB) deformity. This retrospective study evaluated the outcomes in breasts reconstructed with a conventional closing procedure (CCP) and a downward-moving procedure (DMP), respectively, after BCS.

Methods

In CCP, the inferomedial and inferolateral portions of breast tissues were reapproximated toward the midline after wide excision to repair the breast defect. In DMP, the retro-areolar breast tissue was detached from the nipple–areolar complex after wide excision, and the upper pole breast tissue was moved downward to refill the breast defect.

Results

CCP was performed in 20 patients (Group A), and DMP was performed in 28 patients (Group B). Although retraction of the lower part of the breast was postoperatively observed in 13 (72%) of 18 patients from Group A, it was observed in 7 (28%) of 25 patients in Group B (p < 0.05). The downward pointing of the nipple was observed in 8 (44%) of 18 patients from Group A and in 4 (16%) of 25 patients in Group B (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

DMP is more useful for preventing BB deformity than CCP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Clough KB, Cuminet J, Fitoussi A, Nos C, Mosseri V. Cosmetic sequalae after conservative treatment for breast cancer: classification and results of surgical correction. Ann Plast Surg. 1998;41:471–81.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Cochrane RA, Valasiadou P, Wilson ARM, Al-Ghazal SK, Macmillan RD. Cosmesis and satisfaction after breast-conserving surgery correlates with the percentage of breast volume excised. Br J Surg. 2003;90:1505–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Rainsbury RM. Surgery insight: oncoplastic breast-conserving reconstruction –indications, benefits, choices and outcomes. Nat Clin Pract Oncol. 2007;4(11):657–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bulstrode NW, Shrotrica S. Prediction of cosmetic outcome following conservative breast surgery using breast volume measurements. Breast. 2001;10(2):124–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Clough KB, Kaufman GJ, Nos C, Buccimazza I, Sarfati IM. Improving breast cancer surgery: a classification and quadrant per quadrant atlas for oncoplastic surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17(5):1375–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Noguchi M, Yokoi-Noguchi M, Ohno Y, Morioka E, Nakano Y, Kosaka T, Kurita T. Oncoplastic breast conservative surgery: volume replacement vs. volume displacement. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016;42(7):926–34.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Chatterjee A, Gass J, Patel K, Holmes D, Kopkash K, Peiris L, et al. A consensus definition and classification system of oncoplastic surgery developed by the American Society of Breast Surgeons. Ann Surg Oncol. 2019;26:3436–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Noguchi M, Ohno Y, Morioka E, Noguchi M, Nakano Y, Kosaka T, et al. A novel oncoplastic technique for breast cancer localized in the lower pole of the breast. J Surg Oncol. 2017;117:137–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Noguchi M, Noguchi M, Ohno Y, Morioka E, Nakano Y, Kosaka T, et al. Feasibility study of axillary reverse mapping for patients with clinically node-negative breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016;42:650–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Moo TA, Choi L, Culpepper C, Olcese C, Heerdt A, Sclafani L, et al. Impact of margin assessment method on positive margin rate and total volume excised. Ann Sur Oncol. 2014;212:86–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Katariya RN, Forrest APM, Gravelle IH. Breast volumes in cancer of the breast. Br J Cancer. 1974;29:270–3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Clough KB, Soussaline M, Campana F, Salmon RJ. Mammoplasty combined with irradiation: conservative treatment of breast cancer localized in the lower quadrant. Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 1990;35(2):117–22 (in French).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Noguchi M, Taniya T, Miyazaki I, Saito Y. Immediate transposition of a latissimus dorsi muscle for correcting a postquadrantectomy breast deformity in Japanese patients. Int Surg. 1990;75:166–70.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Noguchi M, Saito Y, Mizukami Y, Nonomura A, Ohta N, Koyasaki N, et al. Breast deformity, its correction, and assessment of breast conserving surgery. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1991;18:111–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Clough KB, Nos C, Salmon RJ, Soussaline M, Durand JC. Conservative treatment of breast cancers by mammaplasty and irradiation: a new approach to lower quadrant tumors. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995;96(2):363–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Nos CN, Fitoussi A, Bourgeois D, Fourquet A, Salmon RJ, Clough KB. Conservative treatment of lower pole breast cancers by bilateral mammoplasty and radiotherapy. Eur J Surg Oncol. 1998;24:508–14.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kronowitz S, Hunt KK, Kuerer HM, Strom EA, Buchholz TA, Ensor JE, et al. Practical guidelines for repair of partial mastectomy defects using the breast reduction technique in patients undergoing breast conservation therapy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;120(7):1755–68.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ogawa T, Hanamura N, Yamashita M, Ri Y, Kuriyama N, Isaji S. Usefulness of breast-volume replacement using an inframammary adipofascial flap after breast-conserving therapy. Am J Surg. 2007;193:514–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kijima Y, Yoshinaka H, Owaki T, Funasako Y, Aikou T. Immediate reconstruction using inframammary adipofascial flap of the anterior rectus sheath after partial mastectomy. Am J Surg. 2007;193(6):789–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Otsuka S, Watanabe N, Sasaki Y, Shimojima R. Postoperative courses of breast reconstruction using inferior adipofascial tissue repair. Breast Cancer. 2015;22(6):570–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Nakada H, Inoue M, Furuya K, Watanabe H, Ikegame K, Nakayama Y, et al. Fat necrosis after breast-conserving oncoplastic surgery. Breast Cancer. 2019;26:125–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Raja MA, Straker VF, Rainsbury RM. Extending the role of breast-conserving surgery by immediate volume replacement. Br J Surg. 1997;84:101–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Hernanz F, Regano S, Redondo-Figuero C, Orallo V, Erasun F, Gomez-Fleitas M. Oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery: analysis of quadrantectomy and immediate reconstruction with latissimus dorsi flap. World J Surg. 2007;31:1934–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Khan LR, Raine CR, Dixon JM. Immediate lipofilling in breast conserving surgery. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017;43:1402–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Heine N, Eigenberger A, Brebant V, Kempa S, Seitz S, Pranti L, et al. The effect of radiotherapy on fat engraftment for complete breast reconstruction using lipofilling only. Arch Gynec Obstet. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-022-06610-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. O’Dey D, Prescher A, Pallua N. Vascular reliability of the nipple-areola complex-bearing pedicles: an anatomical microdissection study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;119(4):1167–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Moran MS, Colasanto JM, Haffty BG, Wilspm LD, Lund MW, Higgins SA. Effects of breast-conserving therapy on lactation after pregnancy. Cancer J. 2005;11(5):399–403.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Pusic AL, Klassen AF, Scott AM, Klok JA, Cordeiro PG, Cano SJ. Development of a new patient-reported outcome measure for breast surgery: the BREAST-Q. Plast Recontr Surg. 2009;124:345–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Stolpner I, Heil J, Riedel F, Wallwiener M, Schafgen B, FeiBt M, et al. Long-term patient satisfaction and quality of life after breast-conserving therapy: a prospective study using the Breast-Q. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021;28:8742–51.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Behluli I, Le Renard PE, Rozwag K, Oppelt P, Kaufmann A, Schneider A. Oncoplastic breast surgery versus conventional breast-conserving surgery: a comparative retrospective study. ANZ J Surg. 2019;89:1236–41.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors declare they have no conflicts of interest. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masakuni Noguchi.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Noguchi, M., Morioka, E., Yokoi-Noguchi, M. et al. Oncoplastic breast surgery to prevent “Bird’s beak” deformity in the breast: a comparative retrospective study. Surg Today 54, 14–22 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-023-02690-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-023-02690-0

Keywords

Navigation