Skip to main content
Log in

Novel biodegradable internal stent as a mitigation strategy in high-risk pancreaticojejunostomy: technical notes and preliminary results

  • How To Do It
  • Published:
Surgery Today Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) is the most feared complication after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), as it can lead to extremely poor outcomes. We herein report the preliminary results of an anastomotic technique based on the use of a novel internal biodegradable stent (IBS) to mitigate POPF sequelae. Between October 2020 and May 2021, all patients undergoing PD with high-risk pancreatic anastomosis received a pancreato-jejunal (PJ) anastomosis with an Archimedes IBS placement. Fifteen patients comprised our study cohort. In 11 cases, a 2-mm Archimedes stent was used, and in the remaining four patients, a 2.6-mm stent was used. Overall postoperative complications occurred in eight patients, with four cases being severe. Two patients developed CR-POPF, with one of them dying. In our small preliminary series, PJ anastomosis with an Archimedes™ IBS showed encouraging results in terms of CR-POPF incidence. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. Narayanan S, Martin AN, Turrentine FE, Bauer TW, Adams RB, Zaydfudim VM. Mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy: assessing early and late causes of patient death. J Surg Res. 2018;231:304–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Callery MP, Pratt WB, Kent TS, Chaikof EL, Vollmer CM Jr. A prospectively validated clinical risk score accurately predicts pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;216:1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mungroop TH, van Rijssen LB, van Klaveren D, Smits FJ, van Woerden V, Linnemann RJ, et al. Alternative fistula risk score for pancreatoduodenectomy (a-FRS): design and international external validation. Ann Surg. 2019;269:937–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Schuh F, Mihaljevic AL, Probst P, Trudeau MT, Müller PC, Marchegiani G, et al. A simple classification of pancreatic duct size and texture predicts postoperative pancreatic fistula: a classification of the international study group of pancreatic surgery (ISGPS). Ann Surg. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000004855.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mazzola M, Morini L, Crippa J, Maspero M, Zironda A, Giani A, et al. Totally laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: technical notes. Chirurgia. 2020;115:385–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Poves I, Morató O, Burdío F, Grande L. Laparoscopic-adapted blumgart pancreaticojejunostomy in laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surg Endosc. 2017;31:2837–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mazzola M, Giani A, Crippa J, Morini L, Zironda A, Bertoglio CL, et al. Totally laparoscopic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy: a propensity score matching analysis of short-term outcomes. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021;47:674–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg. 2009;250:187–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Dervenis C, Sarr M, Abu Hilal M, Adham M, et al. The 2016 update of the international study group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 years after. Surgery. 2017;161:584–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. McMillan M, Soi S, Asbun HJ, Ball CG, Bassi C, Beane JD, et al. Risk-adjusted outcomes of clinically relevant pancreatic fistula following pancreatoduodenectomy: a model for performance evaluation. Ann surg. 2016;264:344–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ecker BL, McMillan MT, Asbun HJ, Ball CG, Bassi C, Beane JD, et al. Characterization and optimal management of high-risk pancreatic anastomoses during pancreatoduodenectomy. Ann Surg. 2018;267:608–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Shrikhande SV, Sivasanker M, Vollmer CM, Friess H, Besselink MG, Fingerhut A, et al. Pancreatic anastomosis after pancreatoduodenectomy: a position statement by the international study group of pancreatic surgery (ISGPS). Surgery. 2017;161:1221–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Suzuki S, Kaji S, Koike N, Harada N, Tanaka S, Hayashi T. Pancreaticojejunostomy of duct to mucosa anastomosis can be performed more safely without than with a stenting tube. Am J Surg. 2009;198:51–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kawai M, Yamaue H, Jang JY, Uesaka K, Unno M, Nakamura M, et al. Propensity score-matched analysis of internal stent vs external stent for pancreatojejunostomy during pancreaticoduodenectomy: Japanese-Korean cooperative project. Pancreatology. 2020;20:984–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Winter JM, Cameron JL, Campbell KA, Chang DC, Riall TS, Schulick RD, et al. Does pancreatic duct stenting decrease the rate of pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy? Results of a prospective randomized trial. J Gastrointest Surg. 2006;10:1280–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kadowaki S, Miura F, Amano H, Toyota N, Wada K, Shibuya M, et al. Whereabouts of an internal short stent placed across the pancreaticojejunostomy following pancreatoduodenectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2012;19:566–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Levy MJ, Chari S, Adler DG, Clain JE, Gostout CJ, Harewood GC, et al. Complications of temporary pancreatic stent insertion for pancreaticojejunal anastomosis during pancreaticoduodenectomy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;59:719–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Anderloni A, Fugazza A, Maroni L, Ormando V, Maselli R, Carrara S, et al. New biliary and pancreatic biodegradable stent placement: a single-center, prospective, pilot study (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2020;92:405–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Andrianello S, Marchegiani G, Malleo G, Masini G, Balduzzi A, Paiella S, et al. Pancreaticojejunostomy with externalized stent vs pancreaticogastrostomy with externalized stent for patients with high-risk pancreatic anastomosis: a single-center, phase 3 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg. 2020;155:313–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michele Mazzola.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Michele Mazzola and the other co-authors have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mazzola, M., Bertoglio, C.L., Giani, A. et al. Novel biodegradable internal stent as a mitigation strategy in high-risk pancreaticojejunostomy: technical notes and preliminary results. Surg Today 52, 1115–1119 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-022-02488-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-022-02488-6

Keywords

Navigation