Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Preoperative maximum phonation time as a predictor of pneumonia in patients undergoing esophagectomy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgery Today Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Esophagectomy is a highly invasive procedure, associated with several postoperative complications including pneumonia, anastomotic leakage, and sepsis, which may result in multiorgan failure. Pneumonia is considered a major predictor of poor long-term prognosis, so its prevention is important for patients undergoing surgery for esophageal cancer.

Methods

The subjects of this study were 137 patients who underwent esophagectomy at Keio University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan, between January, 2012 and December, 2016. Patients who underwent R0 or R1 resection or esophagectomy with organ excision were included. Patients who underwent salvage surgery or resection of recurrent laryngeal nerve, and those with preoperative recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy, were excluded. We investigated the effect of the maximum phonation time on the development of postoperative pneumonia.

Results

Pneumonia developed more frequently in patients with a long operative time, clinically left recurrent nerve lymph node metastasis, and a short preoperative maximum phonation time (p = 0.074, 0.046, and 0.080, respectively). Pneumonia was also more common in men with an abnormal maximum phonation time (p = 0.010).

Conclusions

The maximum phonation time is a significant predictor of postoperative pneumonia after esophagectomy in men.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65:87–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Takeuchi H, Miyata H, Gotoh M, Kitagawa Y, Baba H, Kimura W, et al. A risk model for esophagectomy using data of 5354 patients included in a Japanese nationwide web-based database. Ann Surg. 2014;260:259–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ozawa S, Koyanagi K, Ninomiya Y, Yatabe K, Higuchi T. Postoperative complications of minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2020;4:126–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Schieman C, Wigle DA, Deschamps C, Nichols FC, Cassivi SD, Shen KR, et al. Patterns of operative mortality following esophagectomy. Dis Esophagus. 2012;25:645–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kataoka K, Takeuchi H, Mizusawa J, Igaki H, Ozawa S, Abe T, et al. Prognostic impact of postoperative morbidity after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: exploratory analysis of JCOG9907. Ann Surg. 2017;265:1152–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Booka E, Takeuchi H, Suda K, Fukuda K, Nakamura R, Wada N, et al. Meta-analysis of the impact of postoperative complications on survival after oesophagectomy for cancer. BJS Open. 2018;2:276–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kanda M, Koike M, Tanaka C, Kobayashi D, Hayashi M, Yamada S, et al. Risk prediction of postoperative pneumonia after subtotal esophagectomy based on preoperative serum cholinesterase concentrations. Ann Surg Oncol. 2019;26:3718–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Law S, Wong KH, Kwok KF, Chu KM, Wong J. Predictive factors for postoperative pulmonary complications and mortality after esophagectomy for cancer. Ann Surg. 2004;240:791–800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zingg U, Smithers BM, Gotley DC, Smith G, Aly A, Clough A, et al. Factors associated with postoperative pulmonary morbidity after esophagectomy for cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:1460–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hirano M, Koike Y, Von Leden H. Maximum phonation time and air usage during phonation. Clinical study. Folia Phoniatr. 1968;20:185–201.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Japan Esophageal Society. Japanese classification of esophageal cancer. Esophagus. 2016;14:1–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ando N, Kato H, Igaki H, Shinoda M, Ozawa S, Shimizu H, et al. A randomized trial comparing postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil versus preoperative chemotherapy for localized advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus (JCOG9907). Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:68–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hara H, Tahara M, Daiko H, Kato K, Igaki H, Kadowaki S, et al. Phase II feasibility study of preoperative chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Sci. 2013;104:1455–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg. 2009;250:187–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Speyer R, Bogaardt HCA, Passos VL, Roodenburg NP, Zumach A, Heijnen MA, et al. Maximum phonation time: variability and reliability. J Voice. 2010;24:281–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Izawa KP, Watanabe S, Tochimoto S, Hiraki K, Morio Y, Kasahara Y, et al. Relation between maximum phonation time and exercise capacity in chronic heart failure patients. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2012;48:593–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Norman K, Stobäus N, Gonzalez MC, Schulzke JD, Pirlich M. Hand grip strength: outcome predictor and marker of nutritional status. Clin Nutr. 2011;30:135–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sabaté S, Mazo V, Canet J. Predicting postoperative pulmonary complications: implications for outcomes and costs. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2014;27:201–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Shiozaki A, Fujiwara H, Okamura H, Murayama Y, Komatsu S, Kuriu Y, et al. Risk factors for postoperative respiratory complications following esophageal cancer resection. Oncol Lett. 2012;3:907–12.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Reinersman JM, Allen MS, Deschamps C, Ferguson MK, Nichols FC, Shen KR, et al. External validation of the Ferguson pulmonary risk score for predicting major pulmonary complications after oesophagectomy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016;49:333–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lai G, Guo N, Jiang Y, Lai J, Li Y, Lai R. Duration of one-lung ventilation as a risk factor for postoperative pulmonary complications after McKeown esophagectomy. Tumori. 2020;106:47–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Speyer R. Effects of voice therapy: a systematic review. J Voice. 2008;22:565–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kent RD, Kent JF, Rosenbek JC. Maximum performance tests of speech production. J Speech Hear Disord. 1987;52:367–87.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Sayer AA, Robinson SM, Patel HP, Shavlakadze T, Cooper C, Grounds MD. New horizons in the pathogenesis, diagnosis and management of sarcopenia. Age Ageing. 2013;42:145–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Izawa KP, Kasahara Y, Hiraki K, Hirano Y, Watanabe S. Age-related differences of maximum phonation time in patients after cardiac surgery. Diseases. 2017;6:1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lang BHH, Wong CKH, Ma EPM. A systematic review and meta-analysis on acoustic voice parameters after uncomplicated thyroidectomy. Laryngoscope. 2016;126:528–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Mattsson P, Frostell A, Björck G, Persson JKE, Hakim R, Zedenius J, et al. Recovery of voice after reconstruction of the recurrent laryngeal nerve and adjuvant nimodipine. World J Surg. 2018;42:632–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Tsai SW, Ma YF, Shih LC, Tsou YA, Sung CK. Operative and conservative management of laryngeal contact granuloma: a network analysis and systematic review. J Voice. 2021;35:300–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Miyata E, Miyamoto M, Shiromoto O, Kobayashi Y, Yagi M, Kitawaki T, et al. Early voice therapy for unilateral vocal fold paralysis improves subglottal pressure and glottal closure. Am J Otolaryngol. 2020;41:102727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Velasco LC, Imamura R, Rêgo APV, Alves PR, da Silva Peixoto LP, de Oliveira SJ. Sensitivity and specificity of bedside screening tests for detection of aspiration in patients admitted to a public rehabilitation hospital. Dysphagia. 2020;129: 104444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-020-10198-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Kumiko Motooka, from the Department of Surgery in Keio University School of Medicine, for her help with the preparation of this report.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hirofumi Kawakubo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

We have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical approval

All procedures were followed in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1964 and its later versions. Informed consent or a substitute for it was obtained from all patients included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ozawa, H., Kawakubo, H., Matsuda, S. et al. Preoperative maximum phonation time as a predictor of pneumonia in patients undergoing esophagectomy. Surg Today 52, 1299–1306 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-022-02454-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-022-02454-2

Keywords

Navigation