Abstract
Purpose
The pelvic cavity is a monolithic structure whose integrity plays an important role in the pelvic organ function. Currently, pelvic floor peritoneum reconstruction (PFPR) is rarely performed during laparoscopic surgery for middle and low rectal cancer patients. This study evaluated the effect of PFPR using barbed wire during laparoscopic surgery on the postoperative defecation function in middle and low rectal cancer patients.
Methods
This was a retrospective study involving a total of 252 middle and low rectal cancer patients who had been subjected to laparoscopic-assisted anterior resection of rectal cancer at Shanghai Changhai Hospital from March 2018 to April 2020. The Wexner and low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) scores were used to evaluate the postoperative defecation function among patients. A Wexner score ≥ 8 and LARS score ≥ 30 were considered to indicate major defecation dysfunction.
Results
A total of 229 patients (52 patients subjected to PFPR) were followed up, and the Wexner and LARS scores were recorded. The follow-up rate was 90.87%, the mean follow-up time was 22.88 ± 6.93 months, the stoma rate was 64.29%, the ileostomy reduction surgical rate was 90.74%, and the stoma duration was 7.64 ± 2.94 months. Regarding the assessment of postoperative defecation dysfunction using the Wexner score, a multivariate analysis revealed that a long operation time (odds ratio [OR], 0.991; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.984–0.999, p = 0.026) and radiotherapy (OR, 0.352; 95% CI, 0.156–0.797, p = 0.012) were independent risk factors for major defecation dysfunction, while a high tumor location (OR, 1.318; 95% CI, 1.151–1.657, p = 0.001) and PFPR (OR, 4.770; 95% CI, 1.435–15.857, p = 0.011) were independent protective factors for major defecation dysfunction. Regarding the assessment of the postoperative defecation function using the LARS score, a multivariate analysis revealed that a high tumor location (OR, 1.293; 95% CI, 1.125–1.486, p < 0.001) and PFPR (OR, 3.010; 95% CI, 1.345–6.738, p = 0.007) were independent protective factors for major defecation dysfunction. A subgroup analysis showed that the postoperative Wexner score (3.13 ± 2.79 vs. 4.71 ± 3.45 p = 0.003) and LARS score (21.77 ± 8.62 vs. 25.14 ± 8.78 p = 0.015) were lower for patients with PFPR than for patients without PFPR. Regarding patients with low rectal cancer, those with PFPR had a lower LARS score than those without it (23.62 ± 8.94 vs. 28.40 ± 7.90, p = 0.022), but there was no significant difference in the Wexner score between the groups. A total of 9.76% of patients with PFPR and 48.89% of those without PFPR showed an intestinal accumulation in the sacral front (p < 0.001).
Conclusions
PFPR and a high tumor location are protective factors for postoperative defecation dysfunction in middle and low rectal cancer patients. PFPR can be routinely performed during laparoscopic surgery.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Tschann P, Seitinger G, Lechner D, Adler S, Feurstein B, Girotti PNC, et al. Reduced port versus open right hemicolectomy for colorectal cancer: a retrospective comparison study of two centers. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2021;36:1469–77.
Cirocchi R, Cesare CF, Di SS, Popivanov G, Carlini L, Pironi D, et al. Laparoscopic versus open colectomy for obstructing right colon cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Visc Surg. 2017;154:387–99.
Shin JK, Kim HC, Lee WY, Yun SH, Cho YB, Huh JW, et al. Laparoscopic modified mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation in right-sided colon cancer shows better short- and long-term outcomes compared with the open approach in propensity score analysis. Surg Endosc. 2018;32:2721–31.
Aubert M, Mege D. Panis Y Total mesorectal excision for low and middle rectal cancer: laparoscopic versus transanal approach-a meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2020;34:3908–19.
Dulskas A, Kavaliauskas P, Pilipavicius L, Jodinskas M, Mikalonis M, Samalavicius NE. Long-term bowel dysfunction following low anterior resection. Sci Rep. 2020;10:11882.
Pieniowski EHA, Nordenvall C, Palmer G, Johar A, TumlinEkelund S, Lagergren P, et al. Prevalence of low anterior resection syndrome and impact on quality of life after rectal cancer surgery: population-based study. BJS Open. 2020;4:935–42.
Han JG, Wang ZJ, Gao ZG, Wei GH, Yang Y, Zhai ZW, et al. Perineal wound complications after extralevator abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2019;62:1477–84.
Park YY, Yang SY, Han YD, Cho MS, Hur H, Min BS, et al. Predictive factors for bowel dysfunction after sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer: a single-center cross-sectional study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2019;62:925–33.
Garfinkle R, Ky A, Singh A, Morin N, Ghitulescu G, Faria J, et al. Financial and occupational impact of low anterior resection syndrome in rectal cancer survivors. Colorectal Dis. 2021;23:1777–84.
Dulskas A, Kavaliauskas P, Pilipavicius L, Jodinskas M, Mikalonis M, Samalavicius NE. Long-term bowel dysfunction following low anterior resection. Sci Rep. 2020;10:11882.
van Heinsbergen M, Janssen-Heijnen ML, Leijtens JW, Slooter GD, Konsten JL. Bowel dysfunction after sigmoid resection underestimated: Multicentre study on quality of life after surgery for carcinoma of the rectum and sigmoid. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018;44:1261–7.
Tomita R, Sakurai K, Fujisaki S, Hirano T, Suzuki S, Adachi K, et al. Function of pudendal motor nerve in patients with or without fecal incontinence after low anterior resection for lower rectal cancer. Gan Kagaku Ryoho Cancer Chemother. 2020;47(13):1756–8.
van der Sande ME, Hupkens BJP, Berbée M, van Kuijk SMJ, Maas M, Melenhorst J, et al. Impact of radiotherapy on anorectal function in patients with rectal cancer following a watch and wait programme. Radiother Oncol. 2019;132:79–84.
Koushi K, Nishizawa Y, Kojima M, Fujii S, Saito N, Hayashi R, et al. Association between pathologic features of peripheral nerves and postoperative anal function after neoadjuvant therapy for low rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2016;31:1845–52.
Zhu X, Lou Z, Gong H, Meng R, Hao L, Zhang W. Influence of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy on the anal sphincter: ultrastructural damage may be critical. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2016;31:1427–30.
Yang Y, Cao YL, Zhang YY, Shi SS, Yang WW, Zhao N, et al. Clinical efficacy of integral theory-guided laparoscopic integral pelvic floor/ligament repair in the treatment of internal rectal prolapse in females. World J Clin Cases. 2020;8:5876–86.
Lamblin G, Delorme E, Cosson M, Rubod C. Cystocele and functional anatomy of the pelvic floor: review and update of the various theories. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27:1297–305.
Yan X, Su H, Zhang S, Zhou L, Lu J, Yang X, et al. Pelvic peritoneum closure reduces postoperative complications of laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection: 6-year experience in single center. Surg Endosc. 2021;35(1):406–14.
Mäkelä-Kaikkonen J, Rautio T, Kairaluoma M, Carpelan-Holmström M, Kössi J, Rautio A, et al. Does ventral rectopexy improve pelvic floor function in the long term? Dis Colon Rectum. 2018;61(2):230–8.
Funding
This work was supported by "234" Discipline Climbing Peak Project Fund of the First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Military Medical University (2020YXZ043).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ji, L., Li, S., Xin, C. et al. Pelvic floor peritoneum reconstruction is a protective factor for defecation dysfunction after laparoscopic anterior resection in patients with middle and low rectal cancer. Surg Today 52, 1320–1328 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-021-02445-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-021-02445-9