Skip to main content
Log in

Efficacy of a newly developed bioabsorbable pancreatic clip for distal pancreatectomy in swine

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgery Today Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

At present, ≥ 20% of patients experience clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) after distal pancreatectomy (DP).

Methods

We developed a new bioabsorbable pancreatic clip (BioPaC) made of polycaprolactone that does not crush the pancreatic parenchyma during occlusion of the pancreatic stump. We confirmed the efficacy of this BioPac in a porcine DP model and compared it to a linear stapling device (Reinforce®).

Results

Pigs were killed at 1 month after DP. In the BioPaC group, all swine (n = 3) survived well without POPF. In the Reinforce® group (n = 2), one pig died early at postoperative day 7 with Grade C POPF (amylase 43 700 U/l), and the other survived until 1 month at scarification with biochemical leakage of POPF (amylase 3 725 U/l). Pathologically, the main pancreatic duct and pancreatic parenchyma were well closed by BioPaC.

Conclusion

The newly developed BioPaC is effective in a porcine DP model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yamashita Y, Taketomi A, Fukuzawa K, Tsujita E, Harimoto N, Kitagawa D, et al. Risk factors for and management of delayed intraperitoneal hemorrhage after pancreatic and biliary surgery. Am J Surg. 2007;193:454–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ratnayake CBB, Wells C, Hammond J, French JJ, Windsor JA, Pandanaboyana S. Network meta-analysis comparing techniques and outcomes of stump closure after distal pancreatectomy. Br J Surg. 2019;106:1580–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Nakamura M, Wakabayashi G, Miyasaka Y, Tanaka M, Morikawa T, Unno M, et al; Study Group of JHBPS; JSEPS, Tomiyama Y, Miyata H, Takahara T, Beppu T, Yamaue H, Miyazaki M, Takada T. Multicenter comparative study of laparoscopic and open distal pancreatectomy using propensity score-matching. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 22: 731–6, 2015.

  4. Diener MK, Seiler CM, Rossion I, Kleeff J, Glanemann M, Butturini G, et al. Efficacy of stapler vs. hand-sewn closure after distal pancreatectomy (DISPACT): a randomised, controlled multicentre trial. Lancet. 2011;377:1514–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhang H, Zhu F, Shen M, Tian R, Shi CJ, Wang X, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis comparing three techniques for pancreatic remnant closure following distal pancreatectomy. Br J Surg. 2015;102:4–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Yamashita YI, Tsujita E, Chikamoto A, Imai K, Kaida T, Yamao T, et al. Linear stapling device with pre-attached bioabsorbable polyglycolic acid felt reduces postoperative pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy. Anticancer Res. 2017;37:1865–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ikeda T, Akahoshi T, Kawanaka H, Uchiyama H, Yamashita Y, Morita M, et al. Evaluation of a transection method for distal pancreatectomy: a comparative study on the use of electrosurgical and stapling devices in swine. Fukuoka Igaku Zasshi. 2013;104:515–22.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhang W, Wei Z, Che X. Effect of polyglycolic acid mesh for prevention of pancreatic fistula after pancreatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020;99:21456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kondo N, Uemura K, Nakagawa N, Okada K, Kuroda S, Sudo T, Hiroshima Surgical Study Group of Clinical Oncology, et al. A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Trial Comparing Reinforced Staplers with Bare Staplers During Distal Pancreatectomy (HiSCO-07 Trial). Ann Surg Oncol. 2019;26:1519–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Matsumoto I, Kamei K, Satoi S, Murase T, Matsumoto M, Kawaguchi K, Yoshida Y, Dongha L, Takebe A, Nakai T, Takeyama Y. Efficacy of the slow firing method using a reinforced triple-row stapler for preventing postoperative pancreatic fistula during laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. Surg Today. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-021-02344-z.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, Fingerhut A, Yeo C, Izbicki J, et al. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery. 2005;138:8–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Dervenis C, Sarr M, Abu Hilal M, Adham M, et al. The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 years after. Surgery. 2017;161:584–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tsuchitani M, Sato J, Kokoshima H. A comparison of the anatomical structure of the pancreas in experimental animals. J Toxicol Pathol. 2016;29:147–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ferrer J, Scott WE 3rd, Weegman BP, Suszynski TM, Sutherland DE, Hering BJ, et al. Pig pancreas anatomy: implications for pancreas procurement, preservation, and islet isolation. Transplantation. 2008;86:1503–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Eguchi H, Nagano H, Tanemura M, Takeda Y, Marubashi S, Kobayashi S, et al. A thick pancreas is a risk factor for pancreatic fistula after a distal pancreatectomy: selection of the closure technique according to the thickness. Dig Surg. 2011;28:50–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kawai M, Tani M, Okada K, Hirono S, Miyazawa M, Shimizu A, et al. Stump closure of a thick pancreas using stapler closure increases pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy. Am J Surg. 2013;206:352–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We have applied for a PCT patent concerning this work as follows: Baba, H., Yamashita, H., and Ijima, H. inventors; Kumamoto University, and Kyushu University, assignees. Organ Resection Stump Fixing Clip. PCT Application No. PCT/JP2020/011641, filed March 17, 2020. This research was supported by AMED under Grant Number JP18lm0203009 and JP20ml0203112, and Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (KAKENHI) under Grant Number 21K19534. This work was supported by the Center for Clinical and Translational Research of Kyushu University and the Kumamoto Innovative Department Organization.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conception and design; Yamashita, Ijima, and Baba. Analysis and interpretation; Yamashita, Ijima, and Aishima. Data collection: Yamashita, Yamao, Nakao, Miyata, Ikegami, Yamane, Ito, Furukawa, Cho, Wu, and Ijima. Writing article; Yamashita and Ijima. Critical revision of the article: Baba. Obtaining funding: Yamashita, Arima, Fujie, and Baba.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yo-ichi Yamashita or Hideo Baba.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

We have applied for a PCT patent concerning this work as follows: Baba, H., Yamashita, H., and Ijima, H. inventors; Kumamoto University, and Kyushu University, assignees. Organ Resection Stump Fixing Clip. PCT Application No. PCT/JP2020/011641, filed March 17, 2020.

Approval of the research protocol

N/A.

Informed consent

N/A.

Registry and the registration no. of the study/trial

N/A.

Animal study

This study was performed in the Center for Animal Resources and Development of Kumamoto University, and the Kumamoto University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee approved the animal protocol (A2020-072).

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yamashita, Yi., Yamao, T., Nakao, Y. et al. Efficacy of a newly developed bioabsorbable pancreatic clip for distal pancreatectomy in swine. Surg Today 52, 1109–1114 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-021-02435-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-021-02435-x

Keywords

Navigation