Skip to main content
Log in

Treatment strategies and outcomes for elderly patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgery Today Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

A multidisciplinary treatment strategy for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is required to achieve prolonged survival. We aimed to clarify the differences in treatment strategies for locally advanced ESCC and the outcomes of elderly (aged ≥ 75 years) vs. younger patients (aged < 75 years).

Methods

We compared the treatment strategy selection and the outcomes of 40 elderly and 160 younger patients with cStage II/III ESCC diagnosed between January, 2014 and December, 2016.

Results

Nineteen (47.5%) of the elderly patients and 144 (90.0%) of the younger patients underwent esophagectomy and 9 (22.5%) of the elderly patients and 131 (81.9%) of the younger patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Ivor–Lewis or transhiatal esophagectomy was performed more frequently in the elderly group than in the younger group (P = 0.0096). The survival rate after esophagectomy was higher in the younger group than in the elderly group. The overall survival rate of the elderly patients who underwent esophagectomy was significantly higher than that in those who did not.

Conclusions

Esophagectomy is a practical choice for elderly patients with locally advanced ESCC, although reduced treatment intensity may impact long-term survival.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Center of cancer control and information services NCC: cancer statistics in Japan, cancer infromation service. https://ganjoho.jp/en/professional/statistics/table_download.html

  2. Watanabe M. Recent topics and perspectives on esophageal cancer in Japan. JMA J. 2018;1:30–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ruol A, Portale G, Zaninotto G, Cagol M, Cavallin F, Castoro C, et al. Results of esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in elderly patients: age has little influence on outcome and survival. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007;133:1186–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zehetner J, Lipham JC, Ayazi S, Banki F, Oezcelik A, DeMeester SR, et al. Esophagectomy for cancer in octogenarians. Dis Esophagus. 2010;23:666–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Morita M, Egashira A, Yoshida R, Ikeda K, Ogaki K, Shibahara K, et al. Esophagectomy in patients 80 years of age and older with carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus. J Gastroenterol. 2008;43:345–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Poon RT, Law SY, Chu KM, Branicki FJ, Wong J. Esophagectomy for carcinoma of the esophagus in the elderly: Results of current surgical management. Ann Surg. 1998;227:357–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Chang AC, Lee JS. Resection for esophageal cancer in the elderly. Thorac Surg Clin. 2009;19:333–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Abunasra H, Lewis S, Beggs L, Duffy J, Beggs D, Morgan E. Predictors of operative death after oesophagectomy for carcinoma. Br J Surg. 2005;92:1029–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Takeuchi S, Ohtsu A, Doi T, Kojima T, Minashi K, Mera K, et al. A retrospective study of definitive chemoradiotherapy for elderly patients with esophageal cancer. Am J Clin Oncol. 2007;30:607–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40:373–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Japan Esophageal Society. Japanese Classification of Esophageal Cancer, 11th Edition: part I. Esophagus. 2017;14:1–36.

  12. Kitagawa Y, Uno T, Oyama T, Kato K, Kato H, Kawakubo H, et al. Esophageal cancer practice guidelines 2017 edited by the Japan Esophageal Society: part 1. Esophagus. 2019;16:1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Backemar L, Lagergren P, Johar A, Lagergren J. Impact of co-morbidity on mortality after oesophageal cancer surgery. Br J Surg. 2015;102:1097–105.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Miyazaki T, Tanaka N, Hirai H, Yokobori T, Sano A, Sakai M, et al. Ghrelin level and body weight loss after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. J Surg Res. 2012;176:74–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Elliott J, Jackson S, King S, McHugh R, Docherty GN, Reynolds JV, et al. Gut hormone suppression increases food intake after esopagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction. Ann Surg. 2015;262:824–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Nakamura M, Nakamori M, Ojima T, Katsuda M, Hayata K, Iwahashi M, et al. The effect of rikkunshito on body weight loss after esophagectomy. J Surg Res. 2016;204:130–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kato H, Miyazaki T, Sakai M, Sano A, Tanaka N, Kimura H, et al. Videofluoroscopic evaluation in oropharyngeal swallowing after radical esophagectomy with lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer. Anticancer Res. 2007;27:4249–54.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Barreto JC, Posner MC. Transhiatal versus transthoracic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2010;16:3804–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ando N, Kato H, Igaki H, Shinoda M, Ozawa S, Shimizu H, et al. A randomized trial comparing postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil versus preoperative chemotherapy for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus (JCOG9907). Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:68–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Fujiwara H, Shiozaki A, Konishi H, Kosuga T, Komatsu S, Ichikawa D, et al. Perioperative outcomes of single-port mediastinoscope-assisted transhiatal esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer. Dis Esophagus. 2017;30:1–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Funding information is not available.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masayuki Watanabe.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

We have no conflicts of interest to declare in association with this manuscript.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Human rights

This study protocol was approved by the JFCR ethics committee.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 189 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kozuki, R., Watanabe, M., Toihata, T. et al. Treatment strategies and outcomes for elderly patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. Surg Today 52, 377–384 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-021-02348-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-021-02348-9

Keywords

Navigation