Abstract
Purposes
To perform successful aortic valve plasty (AVP) and valve-sparing root replacement (VSRR), a sufficient understanding of the aortic root and cusp geometry is required. Several key parameters of the aortic root and cusp geometry were, therefore, measured intraoperatively.
Methods
Forty-nine patients (63.1 ± 16.6 y.o., 40 males) were measured during the surgeries. The patients were divided into 3 groups; including patients with no or mild aortic valve regurgitation (AR) (n = 13), moderate AR (n = 18), and severe AR (n = 18).
Results
There were no significant differences in the body surface area (1.72 ± 0.19 m2) among the 3 groups (p = 0.858). The effective height (EH) and geometric height (GH) of right coronary cusp were smaller than those of the others (EH: p = 0.068, GH: p < 0.01). The insertion line length (ILL) and free margin length (FML) of each leaflet tended to be significantly longer according to the AR grade(ILL: p < 0.01, FML: p < 0.01). The FML/AVJ ratios were significantly different (p < 0.01). The FML/ILL ratios were constant with the ratio of 0.88 ± 0.1(p = 0.624).
CONCLUSIONS
Although the ILL and FML tended to increase with the AR grade, the FML/ILL ratio remained constant. For successful AVP and VSRR, adequately maintaining the FML/ILL ratio is necessary to prevent remarkable cusp prolapse while also preserving its favorable cusp motion.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
David TE, Feindel CM. An aortic-valve sparing operation for patients with aortic incompetence and aneurysm of the ascending aorta. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1992;103:617–22.
Sarsam MA, Yacoub M. Remodeling of the aortic annulus. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1993;105:435–8.
Schäfers HJ, Bierbach B, Aicher D. A new approach to the assessment of aortic cusp geometry. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006;132:436–8.
Schäfers HJ, Schmied W, Psych D, Marom G, Aicher D. Cusp height in aortic valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;146:269–74.
Bierbach BO, Aicher D, Issa OA, Bomberg H, Gräber S, Glombitza P, et al. Aortic root and cusp configuration determine aortic valve function. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2010;38:400–6.
Khelil N, Sleilaty G, Palladino M, Fouda M, Escande R, Debauchez M, et al. Surgical anatomy of the aortic annulus: landmarks for external annuloplasty in aortic valve repair. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015;99:1220–6.
De Kerchove L, Momeni M, Aphram G, Watremez C, Bollen X, Jashari R, et al. Free margin length and coaptation surface area in normal tricuspid aortic valve: an anatomical study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2018;53(5):1040–8.
Thubrikar MJ, Labrosse MR, Zehr KJ, Robicsek F, Gong GG, Fowler BL. Aortic root dilatation may alter the dimensions of the valve leaflets. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2005;28:850–5.
Swanson M, Clark RE. Dimensions and geometric relationships of the human aortic valve as a function of pressure. Circ Res. 1974;35:871–82.
Silver MA, Roberts WC. Detailed anatomy of the normally functioning aortic valve in hearts of normal and increased weight. Am J Cardiol. 1985;55:454–61.
Roman MJ, Devereux RB, Kramer-Fox R, O’Loughlin J. Two-dimensional echocardiographic aortic root dimensions in normal children and adults. Am J Cardiol. 1989;64:507–12.
Aicher D, Kunihara T, Abou Issa O, Brittner B, Graber S, Schafers HJ. Valve configuration determines long-term results after repair of the bicuspid aortic valve. Circulation. 2011;123:178–85.
Lansac E, Di Centa I, Sleilaty G, Crozat EA, Bouchot O, Hacini R, et al. An aortic ring: from physiologic reconstruction of the root to a standardized approach for aortic valve repair. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;140:S28–35.
Kunihara T, Aicher D, Rodionycheva S, Groesdonk HV, Langer F, Sata F, et al. Preoperative aortic root geometry and postoperative cusp configuration primarily determine long-term outcome after valvepreserving aortic root repair. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012;143:1389–95.
Marom G, Haj-Ali R, Rosenfeld M, Shäfers HJ, Raanani E. Aortic root numeric model: Annulus diameter prediction of effective height and coaptation in post-aortic valve repair. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;145:406–11.
Plonek T, Berezowski M, Bochenek M, Filip G, Rylski B, Golesworthy T, et al. A comparison of aortic root measurements by echocardiography and computed tomography. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019;157(2):479–86.
Kim DH, Handschumacher MD, Levine RA, Sun BJ, Jang JY, Yang DH, et al. Aortic valve adaptation to aortic root dilatation: insights into the mechanism of functional aortic regurgitation from 3-dimensional cardiac computed tomography. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014;7(5):828–35.
Funding
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
None.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fujiyoshi, T., Matsumoto, R., Kamiya, K. et al. Inter-operative determination of the aortic root and cusp geometry associated with the aortic regurgitation grade. Surg Today 51, 384–390 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-020-02100-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-020-02100-9