Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Impact of postoperative complications on outcomes of second surgery for second primary lung cancer

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgery Today Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The best surgical approach for second primary lung cancer remains a subject of debate. The purpose of this study was to review the postoperative complications after second surgery for second primary lung cancer and to investigate the outcomes based on these complications.

Methods

The clinical data of 105 consecutive patients who underwent pulmonary resection for multiple primary lung cancers between January, 1996 and December, 2017, were reviewed according to the Martini–Melamed criteria.

Results

After the second surgery, low body mass index (BMI) (< 18.5 kg/m2) (P = 0.004) and high Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) (P = 0.002) were independent predictors of postoperative complications. Survival analysis revealed the 5-year overall survival rates of 74.5% and 61.4% for patients without postoperative complications and those with postoperative complications (P = 0.044), respectively, but the 5-year cancer-specific survival rates of 82.5% and 80.0% (P = 0.926), respectively. During this period, there were significantly more respiratory-related deaths of patients with complications than of those without complications (P = 0.011).

Conclusion

Surgical intervention is feasible and potentially effective for second primary lung cancer but may not achieve positive perioperative and long-term outcomes for patients with a low BMI or a high CCI. Treatment options should be considered carefully for these patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bae MK, Byun CS, Lee CY, Lee JG, Park IK, Kim DJ, et al. The role of surgical treatment in second primary lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011;92:256–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Asamura H. Multiple primary cancers or multiple metastases, that is the question. J Thorac Oncol. 2010;5:930–1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Tanvetyanon T, Boyle TA. Clinical implications of genetic heterogeneity in multifocal pulmonary adenocarcinomas. J Thorac Dis. 2016;8:E1734–E17381738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Vazquez M, Carter D, Brambilla E, Gazdar A, Noguchi M, Travis WD, et al. Solitary and multiple resected adenocarcinomas after CT screening for lung cancer: histopathologic features and their prognostic implications. Lung Cancer. 2009;64:148–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Johnson BE. Second lung cancers in patients after treatment for an initial lung cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1998;90:1335–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lou F, Huang J, Sima CS, Dycoco J, Rusch V, Bach PB. Patterns of recurrence and second primary lung cancer in early-stage lung cancer survivors followed with routine computed tomography surveillance. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;145:75–81 (discussion 81-2).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ripley RT, McMillan RR, Sima CS, Hasan SM, Ahmad U, Lou F, et al. Second primary lung cancers: smokers versus nonsmokers after resection of stage I lung adenocarcinoma. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014;98:968–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ginsberg RJ, Rubinstein LV. Randomized trial of lobectomy versus limited resection for T1 N0 non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer Study Group. Ann Thorac Surg. 1995;60:615–22 (discussion 22-3).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Brunelli A, Salati M, Rocco G, Varela G, Van Raemdonck D, Decaluwe H, et al. European risk models for morbidity (EuroLung1) and mortality (EuroLung2) to predict outcome following anatomic lung resections: an analysis from the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons database. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017;51:490–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Endo S, Ikeda N, Kondo T, Nakajima J, Kondo H, Yokoi K, et al. Model of lung cancer surgery risk derived from a Japanese nationwide web-based database of 78 594 patients during 2014–2015. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017;52:1182–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fernandez FG, Kosinski AS, Burfeind W, Park B, DeCamp MM, Seder C, et al. The society of thoracic surgeons lung cancer resection risk model: higher quality data and superior outcomes. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;102:370–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hamaji M, Allen MS, Cassivi SD, Deschamps C, Nichols FC, Wigle DA, et al. Surgical treatment of metachronous second primary lung cancer after complete resection of non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;145:683–90 (discussion 90-1).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Yang J, Liu M, Fan J, Song N, He WX, Yang YL, et al. Surgical treatment of metachronous second primary lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014;98:1192–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Martini N, Melamed MR. Multiple primary lung cancers. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1975;70:606–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Moertel CG, Dockerty MB, Baggenstoss AH. Multiple primary malignant neoplasms. II. Tumors of different tissues or organs. Cancer. 1961;14:231–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40:373–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Goldstraw P, Crowley J, Chansky K, Giroux DJ, Groome PA, Rami-Porta R, et al. The IASLC lung cancer staging project: proposals for the revision of the TNM stage groupings in the forthcoming (seventh) edition of the TNM Classification of malignant tumours. J Thorac Oncol. 2007;2:706–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Katayama H, Kurokawa Y, Nakamura K, Ito H, Kanemitsu Y, Masuda N, et al. Extended Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: Japan Clinical Oncology Group postoperative complications criteria. Surg Today. 2016;46:668–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Yang H, Sun Y, Yao F, Yu K, Gu H, Han B, et al. Surgical therapy for bilateral multiple primary lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;101:1145–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Yu YC, Hsu PK, Yeh YC, Huang CS, Hsieh CC, Chou TY, et al. Surgical results of synchronous multiple primary lung cancers: similar to the stage-matched solitary primary lung cancers? Ann Thorac Surg. 2013;96:1966–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zuin A, Andriolo LG, Marulli G, Schiavon M, Nicotra S, Calabrese F, et al. Is lobectomy really more effective than sublobar resection in the surgical treatment of second primary lung cancer? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013;44:e120–e125125 (discussion e25).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Thomas PA, Berbis J, Falcoz PE, Le Pimpec-Barthes F, Bernard A, Jougon J, et al. National perioperative outcomes of pulmonary lobectomy for cancer: the influence of nutritional status. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014;45:652–9 (discussion 59).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Launer H, Nguyen DV, Cooke DT. National perioperative outcomes of pulmonary lobectomy for cancer in the obese patient: a propensity score matched analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;145:1312–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Williams T, Gulack BC, Kim S, Fernandez FG, Ferguson MK. Operative risk for major lung resection increases at extremes of body mass index. Ann Thorac Surg. 2017;103:296–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wang CY, Lin YS, Tzao C, Lee HC, Huang MH, Hsu WH, et al. Comparison of Charlson comorbidity index and Kaplan-Feinstein index in patients with stage I lung cancer after surgical resection. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2007;32:877–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhao H, Yang H, Han K, Xu J, Yao F, Zhao Y, et al. Clinical outcomes of patients with metachronous second primary lung adenocarcinomas. Onco Targets Ther. 2017;10:295–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Nakagawa T, Toyazaki T, Chiba N, Ueda Y, Gotoh M. Prognostic value of body mass index and change in body weight in postoperative outcomes of lung cancer surgery. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2016;23:560–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Nothing to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seijiro Sato.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare in association with the present study.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 31 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sato, S., Nakamura, M., Shimizu, Y. et al. Impact of postoperative complications on outcomes of second surgery for second primary lung cancer. Surg Today 50, 1452–1460 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-020-02038-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-020-02038-y

Keywords

Navigation