Skip to main content
Log in

Impact of hospital size on the outcomes of appendectomy in children: an analysis of a comprehensive nationwide pediatric dataset

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgery Today Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purposes

The purpose of this study was to investigate the outcomes after appendectomy in children according to hospital size.

Methods

The records of 11,565 patients with the diagnosis-related group code for appendectomy were extracted from HIRA-Pediatric Patient Sample from 2012 to 2016. The number of hospital visits and the length of stay in hospital within 30 days after appendectomy were analyzed.

Results

Patients who were treated at large-sized hospitals were more likely to be younger, more likely to reside in metropolitan areas, and tended to receive laparoscopic surgery. The number of hospital visits within 30 days in patients managed by medium- and large-sized hospitals decreased in comparison to small-sized hospitals. The length of hospital stay in large-sized hospitals was decreased in comparison to small- and medium-sized hospitals. A subgroup analysis revealed that complicated appendectomy did not have a significant impact on the difference in the length of hospital stay between hospital sizes.

Conclusion

The number of hospital visits and the length of hospital stay was higher in small-sized hospitals in comparison to large-sized hospitals. Appendectomy performed in the larger hospital showed better outcomes in pediatric patients. We recommend that pediatric surgical procedures be performed in large hospitals, and that proper incentives be given for procedures to be performed by pediatric specialists.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Smink DS, Finkelstein JA, Kleinman K, Fishman SJ. The effect of hospital volume of pediatric appendectomies on the misdiagnosis of appendicitis in children. Pediatrics. 2004;113:18–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Alexander F, Magnuson D, DiFiore J, Jirousek K, Secic M. Specialty versus generalist care of children with appendicitis: an outcome comparison. J Pediatr Surg. 2001;36:1510–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Collins HL, Almond SL, Thompson B, Lacy D, Greaney M, Baillie CT, et al. Comparison of childhood appendicitis management in the regional paediatric surgery unit and the district general hospital. J Pediatr Surg. 2010;45(2):300–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Giuliani S, Cecil EV, Apelt N, Sharland M, Saxena S. Pediatric emergency appendectomy and 30-day postoperative outcomes in district general hospitals and specialist pediatric surgical centers in England, April 2001 to March 2012: retrospective cohort study. Ann Surg. 2016;263(1):184–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ponsky TA, Huang ZJ, Kittle K, Eichelberger MR, Gilbert JC, Brody F, et al. Hospital- and patient-level characteristics and the risk of appendiceal rupture and negative appendectomy in children. JAMA. 2004;292(16):1977–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Somme S, To T, Langer JC. Effect of subspecialty training on outcome after pediatric appendectomy. J Pediatr Surg. 2007;42(1):221–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee SL, Shekherdimian S, Chiu VY. Comparison of pediatric appendicitis outcomes between teaching and nonteaching hospitals. J Pediatr Surg. 2010;45(5):894–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. LaRiviere CA, McAteer JP, Huaco JA, Garrison MM, Avansino JR, Koepsell TD, et al. Outcomes in pediatric surgery by hospital volume: a population-based comparison. Pediatr Surg Int. 2013;29(6):561–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. McBurney C. Experience with early operative interference in cases of disease of the vermiform appendix. NY Med J. 1889;50:676–84.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Masoomi H, Nguyen NT, Dolich MO, Mills S, Carmichael JC, Stamos MJ. Laparoscopic appendectomy trends and outcomes in the United States: data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS), 2004–2011. Am Surg. 2014;80(10):1074–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rentea RM, Peter SDS, Snyder CL. Pediatric appendicitis: state of the art review. Pediatr Surg Int. 2017;33(3):269–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bundy DG, Byerley JS, Liles EA, Perrin EM, Katznelson J, Rice HE. Does this child have appendicitis? JAMA. 2007;298:438.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Anderson JE, Bickler SW, Chang DC, Talamini MA. Examining a common disease with unknown etiology: trends in epidemiology and surgical management of appendicitis in California, 1995–2009. World J Surg. 2012;36(12):2787–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Stewart B, Khanduri P, McCord C, Ohene-Yeboah M, Uranues S, Vega Rivera F, et al. Global disease burden of conditions requiring emergency surgery. Br J Surg. 2014;101(1):e9–e22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lee JH, Park YS, Choi JS. The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in South Korea: national registry data. J Epidemiol. 2010;20(2):97–105.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Alloo J, Gerstle T, Shilyansky J, Ein SH. Appendicitis in children less than 3 years of age: a 28-year review. Pediatr Surg Int. 2004;19(12):777–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bratton SL, Haberkern CM, Waldhausen JH, Sawin RS, Allison JW. Intussusception: hospital size and risk of surgery. Pediatrics. 2001;107:299–303.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Cosper GH, Hamann MS, Stiles A, Nakayama DK. Hospital characteristics affect outcomes for common pediatric surgical conditions. Am Surg. 2006;72:739–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Raval MV, Cohen ME, Barsness KA, Bentrem DJ, Phillips JD, Reynolds M. Does hospital type affect pyloromyotomy outcomes? Analysis of the kids’ inpatient database. Surgery. 2010;148:411–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kim L, Kim JA, Kim S. A guide for the utilization of Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service National Patient Samples. Epidemiol Health. 2014;30(36):e2014008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Murata A, Mayumi T, Muramatsu K, Ohtani M, Matsuda S. Effect of hospital volume on outcomes of laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis: an observational study. J Gastrointest Surg. 2015;19(5):897–904.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Choi KM. Investigation of cancer mortality inequalities between rural and urban areas in South Korea. Aust J Rural Health. 2016;24(1):61–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Cheong LH, Emil S. Determinants of appendicitis outcomes in Canadian children. J Pediatr Surg. 2014;49:777–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kim TH, Park EC, Jang SI, Jang SY, Lee SA, Choi JW. Effects of diagnosis-related group payment system on appendectomy outcomes. J Surg Res. 2016;206(2):347–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Hyun-Young Kim or Kyoung-Bok Min.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest in association with the present study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Byun, J., Min, JY., Yang, HB. et al. Impact of hospital size on the outcomes of appendectomy in children: an analysis of a comprehensive nationwide pediatric dataset. Surg Today 50, 1515–1523 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-020-02035-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-020-02035-1

Keywords

Navigation