Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Preoperative incremental maximum squeeze pressure as a predictor of fecal incontinence after very low anterior resection for low rectal cancer

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgery Today Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Very low anterior resection (VLAR) is performed widely, but some patients are left with fecal incontinence (FI), which compromises their quality of life (QOL) severely. This study sought to identify the predictive factors of postoperative FI after VLAR, which remain unclear.

Methods

We evaluated the anorectal manometry data of patients who underwent VLAR to identify the risk factors for postoperative FI among the various clinicopathological factors and manometric characteristics. FI and QOL were analyzed using the Wexner score and EORTC QLQ-C30, respectively.

Results

The subjects of this study were 40 patients who underwent VLAR for low rectal cancer between April, 2015 and May, 2018. There were 11 (27%) patients in the major-FI group and 29 (73%) in the minor-FI group. Multivariate analysis revealed that low preoperative incremental maximum squeeze pressure (iMSP) was an independent risk factor for postoperative major-FI. Postoperative QOL tended to be worse in the major-FI group.

Conclusions

Preoperative low iMSP increases the risk of major-FI and impaired QOL after VLAR. This highlights the importance of performing preoperative anorectal manometry to evaluate the patient’s anal function as well as to select the most appropriate operative procedure and early multifaceted treatment such as medication, rehabilitation, and biofeedback for postoperative FI.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mion F, Garros A, Brochard C, Vitton V, Ropert A, Bouvier M, et al. 3D High-definition anorectal manometry: values obtained in asymptomatic volunteers, fecal incontinence and chronic constipation. Results of a prospective multicenter study (NOMAD). Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.13049.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dulskas A, Samalavicius NE. Usefulness of anorectal manometry for diagnosing continence problems after a low anterior resection. Ann Coloproctol. 2016;32:101–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Emmertsen KJ, Laurberg S. Low anterior resection syndrome score: development and validation of a symptom-based scoring system for bowel dysfunction after low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Ann Surg. 2012;255:922–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Juul T, Ahlberg M, Biondo S, Emmertsen KJ, Espin E, Jimenez LM, et al. International validation of the low anterior resection syndrome score. Ann Surg. 2014;259:728–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ramage L, Qiu S. A systematic review of sacral nerve stimulation for low anterior resection syndrome. Colorectal Dis. 2015;17:762–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Wexner SD, Coller JA, Devroede G, Hull T, McCallum R, Chan M, et al. Sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence: results of a 120-patient prospective multicenter study. Ann Surg. 2010;251:441–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zielinski T, Czyzewski P, Szczepkowski M. The usefulness of anorectal manometry in patients with a stoma before and after surgery to restore the continuity of the gastrointestinal tract. Pol Przegl Chir. 2016;88:1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. De Nardi P, Testoni SG, Corsetti M, Andreoletti H, Giollo P, Passaretti S, et al. Manometric evaluation of anorectal function in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Dig Liver Dis. 2017;49:91–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Marola S, Ferrarese A, Gibin E, Capobianco M, Bertolotto A, Enrico S, et al. Anal sphincter dysfunction in multiple sclerosis: an observation manometric study. Open Med (Wars). 2016;11:509–17.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Saito N, Ito M, Kobayashi A, Nishizawa Y, Kojima M, Nishizawa Y, et al. Long-term outcomes after intersphincteric resection for low-lying rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21:3608–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Emmertsen KJ, Laurberg S. Bowel dysfunction after treatment for rectal cancer. Acta Oncol. 2008;47:994–1003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ekkarat P, Boonpipattanapong T, Tantiphlachiva K, Sangkhathat S. Factors determining low anterior resection syndrome after rectal cancer resection: a study in Thai patients. Asian J Surg. 2016;39:225–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bharucha AE, Rao SS. An update on anorectal disorders for gastroenterologists. Gastroenterology. 2014;146(37–45):e2.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kakodkar R, Gupta S, Nundy S. Low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: functional assessment and factors affecting outcome. Colorectal Dis. 2006;8:650–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Bharucha AE, Fletcher JG, Harper CM, Hough D, Daube JR, Stevens C, et al. Relationship between symptoms and disordered continence mechanisms in women with idiopathic faecal incontinence. Gut. 2005;54:546–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Matsushita K, Yamada K, Sameshima T, Niwa K, Hase S, Akiba S, et al. Prediction of incontinence following low anterior resection for rectal carcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum. 1997;40:575–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Bakx R, Doeksen A, Slors JF, Bemelman WA, van Lanschot JJ, Boeckxstaens GE. Neorectal irritability after short-term preoperative radiotherapy and surgical resection for rectal cancer. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104:133–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Morgado PJ Jr, Wexner SD, James K, Nogueras JJ, Jagelman DG. Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: is preoperative anal manometry predictive of postoperative functional outcome? Dis Colon Rectum. 1994;37:224–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Yamana T, Oya M, Komatsu J, Takase Y, Mikuni N, Ishikawa H. Preoperative anal sphincter high pressure zone, maximum tolerable volume, and anal mucosal electrosensitivity predict early postoperative defecatory function after low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 1999;42:1145–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Emmertsen KJ, Laurberg S, Rectal Cancer Function Study G. Impact of bowel dysfunction on quality of life after sphincter-preserving resection for rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2013;100:1377–87.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hiroyuki Egi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Masatoshi Kochi and his co-authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kochi, M., Egi, H., Adachi, T. et al. Preoperative incremental maximum squeeze pressure as a predictor of fecal incontinence after very low anterior resection for low rectal cancer. Surg Today 50, 516–524 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-019-01926-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-019-01926-2

Keywords

Navigation