Skip to main content
Log in

Sleeve plus procedures: need of time

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Surgery Today Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as a standalone procedure has gained a lot of popularity over laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in the last decades and is the most frequently performed bariatric procedure worldwide; however, the long-term results are not promising in terms of weight regain and re-emergence of comorbidities. Considering the proven concept of biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch, many novel procedures have been developed involving a sleeve gastrectomy along with some intestinal bypass or alteration in small intestine anatomy. These procedures show better technical feasibility and are associated with less post-operative morbidity, sleeve plus procedures permanently adopt the digestive tract to the present lifestyle, by eliminating the gastric storage of hypercaloric and excessively processed food, and providing the ileum with the needed stimulus for incretin release.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Cao J, Ren Q, Tan C, Duan J. Small intestinal bypass induces a persistent weight-loss effect and improves glucose tolerance in obese rats. Obes Surg. 2017;27:1859–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cheng Y, Huang X, Wu D, Liu Q, Zhong M, Liu T, et al. Sleeve gastrectomy with bypass of proximal small intestine provides better diabetes control than sleeve gastrectomy alone under postoperative high-fat diet. Obes Surg. 2019;29:84–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Huang CK, Liu CC, Hsin MC, Chen YC. Sleeve and sleeve plus. Ann Laparosc Endosc Surg. 2017;2:24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dorman RB, Rasmus NF, al-Haddad BJ, Serrot FJ, Slusarek BM, Sampson BK, et al. Benefits and complications of the duodenal switch/biliopancreatic diversion compared to the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surgery. 2012;152:758–65 (discussion 765–7).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sánchez-Pernaute A, Rubio Herrera MA, Pérez-Aguirre E, García Pérez JC, Cabrerizo L, Díez Valladares L, et al. Proximal duodenal-ileal end-to-side bypass with sleeve gastrectomy: proposed technique. Obes Surg. 2007;17:1614–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kasama K, Tagaya N, Kanehira E, Oshiro T, Seki Y, Kinouchi M, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with duodenojejunal bypass: technique and preliminary results. Obes Surg. 2009;19:1341–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Huang CK, Goel R, Tai CM, Yen YC, Gohil VD, Chen XY. Novel metabolic surgery for type II diabetes mellitus: loop duodenojejunal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2013;23:481–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ugale S, Vennapusa A, Katakwar A, Ugale A. Laparoscopic bariatric surgery current trends and controversies. Ann Laparosc Endosc Surg. 2017;2:154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge Dr. V Amar, bariatric and metabolic Surgeon, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad, India 500033 for contributing the surgical figures.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abhishek Katakwar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest in association with the present study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huang, CK., Katakwar, A. Sleeve plus procedures: need of time. Surg Today 50, 419–422 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-019-01895-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-019-01895-6

Keywords

Navigation