True esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma: background of its definition and current surgical trends
- 84 Downloads
The definition of true esophagogastric junction (EGJ) adenocarcinoma and its surgical treatment are debatable. We review the basis for the current definition and the Japanese surgical strategy in managing true EGJ adenocarcinoma. The Siewert classification is a well-known anatomical classification system for EGJ adenocarcinomas: type II tumors in the region 1 cm above and 2 cm below the EGJ are described as “true carcinoma of the cardia”. Coincidentally, this range matches gastric cardiac gland distribution. Conversely, Nishi’s classification is generally used to describe EGJ carcinomas, defined as tumors with the center located within 2 cm above and 2 cm below the EGJ, regardless of their histological subtype. This range coincides with the extent of the lower esophageal sphincter combined with gastric cardiac gland distribution. The current Japanese surgical strategy focuses on the tumor range from the EGJ to the esophagus and stomach. According to previous studies, the strategy can be roughly classified into three types. The optimal surgical procedure for true EGJ adenocarcinoma is controversial. However, an ongoing Japanese nationwide prospective trial will help confirm the appropriate standard surgery, including the optimal extent of lymph node dissection.
KeywordsEsophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma Gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma Siewert classification Surgery
This work was supported in part by JSPS KAKENHI (Grant number 16H05399).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
We have no conflicts of interest to declare.
- 4.Chow WH, Blaser MJ, Blot WJ, Gammon MD, Vaughan TL, Risch HA. An inverse relation between cagA+strains of helicobacter pylori infection and risk of esophageal and gastric cardia adenocarcinoma. Cancer Res. 1998;58:588–90.Google Scholar
- 9.Nishi M, Noumura H, Kajisa T, Aiko T, Kaneko Y, Kawaji T, et al. Surgical problem of carcinoma in the esophagogastric junction (In Japanese with English abstract). Stomach Intest. 1978;13:1497–507.Google Scholar
- 10.Japanese classification of gastric cancer, 3rd English ed. Japanese Gastric Cancer Association; 2011.Google Scholar
- 11.Japanese classification of esophageal cancer, 11th ed. Tokyo: Japan Esophageal Society; 2015.Google Scholar
- 16.Haverkamp L, Seesing MFJ, Ruurda JP, Boone J, Hillegersberg R. Worldwide trends in surgical techniques in the treatment of esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancer. Dis Esophagus. 2017;30:1–7.Google Scholar
- 21.Omloo JM, Lagrade SM, Hulscher JB, Reitsma JB, Fockens P, van Dekken H, et al. Extended transthoracic resection compared within limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the mid/distal esophagus: five-year survival of a randomized clinical trial. Ann Surg. 2007;246:992–1000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 33.Hosokawa Y, Kinoshita T, Konishi M, Takahashi S, Gotohda N, Kato Y, et al. Clinicopathological features and prognostic factors of adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction according to Siewert classification: experiences at a single institution in Japan. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:677–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 34.Koyanagi K, Kato F, Kanamori J, Daiko H, Ozawa S, Tachimori Y. Clinical significance of esophageal invasion length for the prediction of mediastinal lymph node metastasis in Siewert type II adenocarcinoma: a retrospective single-institution study. Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2018;2:187–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 41.Brierley JD, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind C. TNM classification of malignant tumours. 8th ed. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell; 2017.Google Scholar
- 42.Tsujinaka T, Sasako M, Yamamoto S, Sano T, Kurokawa Y, Nashimoto A, et al. Influence of overweight on surgical complication for gastric cancer: results from a randomized control trial comparing D2 and extended para-aortic D3 lymphadenectomy (JCOG9501). Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:355–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar