The prognostic significance of the comprehensive complication index in patients with gastric cancer
- 86 Downloads
Postoperative complications worsen the prognosis of gastric cancer patients. The Clavien–Dindo classification is used to evaluate postoperative complications. The prognostic significance of the comprehensive complication index (CCI), a new tool for evaluating postoperative complications, remains unclear.
This study included 452 gastric adenocarcinoma patients who underwent curative surgery.
The CCI values were significantly higher in older patients ( ≥ 70 years; P < 0.0001), male patients (P < 0.0001), those with lymphatic invasion (P = 0.039), and those with vascular invasion (P = 0.037). The five-year overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) rates were significantly higher in patients without postoperative complications and those with Clavien–Dindo grade 1 complications in comparison to those with Clavien–Dindo grade 2–4 complications (80.4% vs. 66.2%, P = 0.0011; 89.7% vs. 82.3%; P = 0.045, respectively). Among patients with Clavien–Dindo grade 2–4 complications, the 5-year OS and DSS rates in the CCIHigh group ( ≥ 32.15) were significantly lower than those in the CCILow group ( < 32.15; 47.5% vs. 74.9%, P = 0.0086; 63.1% vs. 90.0%, P = 0.0003). A multivariate analysis identified the CCI as an independent prognostic indicator in patients with Clavien–Dindo grade 2–4 complications.
The CCI was closely associated with the prognosis of patients with Clavien–Dindo grade 2–4 complications and may be a prognostic indicator.
KeywordsClavien–Dindo classification Comprehensive complication index Gastric cancer Prognosis
We thank Edanz Group (www.edanzediting.com/ac) for editing a draft of this manuscript.
The authors received no grants, equipment or funding for this study.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest in association with the present study.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were carried out in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or with comparable ethical standards.
- 1.Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2014. Japan: KANEHARA & Co., LTD. 2014.Google Scholar
- 9.Aoyama T, Murakawa M, Katayama Y, Yamaoku K, Kanazawa A, Higuchi A, et al. Impact of postoperative complications on survival and recurrence in pancreatic cancer. Anticancer Res. 2015;35:2401–9.Google Scholar
- 10.Saeki H, Tsutsumi S, Tajiri H, Yukaya T, Tsutsumi R, Nishimura S, et al. Prognostic Significance of Postoperative Complications After Curative Resection for Patients With Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Annals of surgery 2016.Google Scholar
- 14.Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma: 3rd English edition. Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association 2011;14:101–12.Google Scholar
- 16.Goldfarb Y, Sorski L, Benish M, Levi B, Melamed R, Ben-Eliyahu S. Improving postoperative immune status and resistance to cancer metastasis: a combined perioperative approach of immunostimulation and prevention of excessive surgical stress responses. Ann Surg. 2011;253:798–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 35.Kader A, Murakami Y, Yoshimoto M, Onishi K, Kuroda H, Matsunaga T, et al. Intra-abdominal complications after curative gastrectomies worsen prognoses of patients with stage II–III gastric cancer. Yonago Acta Medica. 2016;59:210–6.Google Scholar