Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Antimicrobial prophylaxis for 1 day versus 3 days in liver cancer surgery: a randomized controlled non-inferiority trial

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgery Today Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purposes

This study compared the effectiveness of 1-day vs 3-days antibiotic regimen to prevent surgical site infection (SSI) in open liver resection.

Method

We performed a randomized controlled non-inferiority trial in 480 patients at 39 hospitals across Japan (registered as UMIN000002852). Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma scheduled to undergo resection were randomly assigned to receive either a 1-day regimen for antimicrobial prophylaxis, or a 3-day regimen. The primary endpoint was the incidence of SSI.

Results

Among 480 randomized patients, 232 assigned to the 1-day regimen and 235 to the 3-day regimen were included in the full analysis set. Baseline characteristics of the two groups were well balanced. SSI was diagnosed in 22 patients (9.5%) in the 1-day group vs 23 patients (9.8%) in the 3-day group (difference, – 0.30; 90% CI – 4.80 to 4.19% [95% CI – 5.66% to 5.05%]; one-sided P = 0.001 for non-inferiority), meeting the non-inferiority hypothesis. In both groups, remote site infection (16 [6.9%] vs 22 [9.4%], P ˂ 0.001 for non-inferiority) and drain-related infection (5 [2.2%] vs 4 [1.7%], P ˂ 0.001 for non-inferiority) were comparable.

Conclusion

To prevent SSI in liver cancer surgery, a 1-day regimen of flomoxef sodium is recommended for antimicrobial prophylaxis because of confirming the non-inferiority to longer usage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CDC:

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

CI:

Confidence interval

CT:

Computed tomography

HCC:

Hepatocellular carcinoma

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

SSI:

Surgical site infection

References

  1. Burke JP. Infection control—a problem for patient safety. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(7):651–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, Silver LC, Jarvis WR. Guideline for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Am J Infect Control. 1999;27(2):97–132.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bratzler DW, Dellinger EP, Olsen KM, Perl TM, Auwaerter PG, Bolon MK, Fish DN, Napolitano LM, Sawyer RG, Slain D, Steinberg JP, Weinstein RA, American Society of Health-System Pharmacists; Infectious Disease Society of America; Surgical Infection Society; Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. Clinical practice guidelines for antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2013;70(3):195–283.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Teillant A, Gandra S, Barter D, Morgan DJ, Laxminarayan R. Potential burden of antibiotic resistance on surgery and cancer chemotherapy antibiotic prophylaxis in the USA: a literature review and modelling study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2015;15(12):1429–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Berríos-Torres SI, Umscheid CA, Bratzler DW, Leas B, Stone EC, Kelz RR, Reinke CE, Morgan S, Solomkin JS, Mazuski JE, Dellinger EP, Itani KMF, Berbari EF, Segreti J, Parvizi J, Blanchard J, Allen G, Kluytmans JAJW, Donlan R, Schecter WP, Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Guideline for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 2017. JAMA Surg. 2017;152(8):784–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Alexiou VG, Ierodiakonou V, Peppas G, Falagas ME. Antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery: an international survey. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2010;11(4):343–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Imamura H, Kurokawa Y, Tsujinaka T, Inoue K, Kimura Y, Iijima S, et al. Intraoperative versus extended antimicrobial prophylaxis after gastric cancer surgery: a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2012;12(5):381–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Takayama T, Sekine T, Makuuchi M, Yamasaki S, Kosuge T, Yamamoto J, et al. Adoptive immunotherapy to lower postsurgical recurrence rates of hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2000;356(9232):802–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Clavien PA, Petrowsky H, DeOliveira ML, Graf R. Strategies for safer liver surgery and partial liver transplantation. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(15):1545–59.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Moreno Elola-Olaso A, Davenport DL, Hundley JC, Daily MF, Gedaly R. Predictors of surgical site infection after liver resection: a multicentre analysis using National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data. HPB (Oxford). 2012;14(2):136–41.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Nakahira S, Shimizu J, Miyamoto A, Kobayashi S, Umeshita K, Ito T, et al. Proposal for a sub-classification of hepato-biliary-pancreatic operations for surgical site infection surveillance following assessment of results of prospective multicenter data. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2013;20(5):504–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Paruch JL, Merkow RP, Bentrem DJ, Ko CY, Posner MC, Cohen ME, et al. Impact of hepatectomy surgical complexity on outcomes and hospital quality rankings. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21(6):1773–800.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wu CC, Yeh DC, Lin MC, Liu TJ, Peng FK. Prospective randomized trial of systemic antibiotics in patients undergoing liver resection. Br J Surg. 1998;85(4):489–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Togo S, Tanaka K, Matsuo K, Nagano Y, Ueda M, Morioka D, Endo I, Shimada H. Duration of antimicrobial prophylaxis in patients undergoing hepatectomy: a prospective randomized controlled trial using flomoxef. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2007;59(5):964–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hirokawa F, Hayashi M, Miyamoto Y, Asakuma M, Shimizu T, Komeda K, et al. Evaluation of postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis after liver resection: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Surg. 2013;206(1):8–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Takagane A, Mohri Y, Konishi T, Fukushima R, Noie T, Sueyoshi S, et al. Randomized clinical trial of 24 versus 72 h antimicrobial prophylaxis in patients undergoing open total gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Br J Surg. 2017;104(2):e158–e164164.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gomi H, Solomkin JS, Takada T, Strasberg SM, Pitt HA, Yoshida M, Kusachi S, Mayumi T, Miura F, Kiriyama S, Yokoe M, Kimura Y, Higuchi R, Windsor JA, Dervenis C, Liau KH, Kim MH, Tokyo Guideline Revision Committee. TG13 antimicrobial therapy for acute cholangitis and cholecystitis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2013;20(1):60–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Midorikawa Y, Takayama T, Nara S, Hashimoto T, Omichi K, Ebisawa K, et al. No Need of Immediate Treatment for Hypovascular Tumors Associated with Hepatocellular Carcinoma. World J Surg. 2016;40(10):2460–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Levy I, Greig PD, Gallinger S, Langer B, Sherman M. Resection of hepatocellular carcinoma without preoperative tumor biopsy. Ann Surg. 2001;234(2):206–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan. The clinical staging of hepatocellular carcinoma. In: Makuuchi M, editor. General rules for the clinical and pathological study of primary liver cancer. 3rd ed. Ltd, Tokyo: Kanehara & Co.; 2010. p. 26–27.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Takayama T, Makuuchi M, Kubota K, Harihara Y, Hui AM, Sano K, et al. Randomized comparison of ultrasonic vs clamp transection of the liver. Arch Surg. 2001;136(8):922–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Yamazaki S, Takayama T, Moriguchi M, Mitsuka Y, Okada S, Midorikawa Y, et al. Criteria for drain removal following liver resection. Br J Surg. 2012;99(11):1584–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ban KA, Minei JP, Laronga C, Harbrecht BG, Jensen EH, Fry DE, Itani KM, Dellinger EP, Ko CY, Duane TM. American College of Surgeons and Surgical Infection Society: Surgical Site Infection Guidelines, 2016 Update. J Am Coll Surg. 2017;224(1):59–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Liu CL, Fan ST, Lo CM, Wong Y, Ng IO, Lam CM, et al. Abdominal drainage after hepatic resection is contraindicated in patients with chronic liver diseases. Ann Surg. 2004;239(2):194–201.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Pelton JJ, Hoffman JP, Eisenberg BL. Comparison of liver function tests after hepatic lobectomy and hepatic wedge resection. Am Surg. 1998;64(5):408–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kudo M, Izumi N, Ichida T, Ku Y, Kokudo N, Sakamoto M, et al. Report of the 19th follow-up survey of primary liver cancer in Japan. Hepatol Res. 2016;46(5):372–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ercolani G, Grazi GL, Ravaioli M, Del Gaudio M, Gardini A, Cescon M, et al. Liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma on cirrhosis: univariate and multivariate analysis of risk factors for intrahepatic recurrence. Ann Surg. 2003;237(4):536–43.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Dechartres A, Boutron I, Trinquart L, Charles P, Ravaud P. Single-center trials show larger treatment effects than multicenter trials: evidence from a meta-epidemiologic study. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155(1):39–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Investigators who participated in this study: T. Itamoto (Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima); O. Masaaki (Yamaguchi University Hospital, Yamaguchi); M. Shimada (Tokushima University Hospital, Tokushima); S. Isaji (Mie University Hospital, Mie); T. Kanematsu (Nagasaki University Hospital, Nagasaki); S. Kubo (Osaka City University Hospital, Osaka); K. Chijiiwa (Miyazaki University Hospital, Miyazaki); K. Dono (Toyonaka Municipal Hospital, Osaka); K. Yanaga (Jikei Medical University Hospital, Tokyo); Y. Doki (Osaka University Hospital, Osaka); I. Koyama (Saitama Medical University Hospital, Saitama); K. Hirata (Sapporo Medical University Hospital, Hokkaido); J. Iseki (Shizuoka General Hospital, Shizuoka); K. Miyazaki (Saga University Hospital, Saga); Yamaue (Wakayama Medical University Hospital, Wakayama); M. Miyazaki (Chiba University Hospital, Chiba); S. Uemoto (Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto); Y. Nakajima (Nara Medical University Hospital, Nara); M. Unno (Tohoku University Hospital, Miyagi); H. Saitsu (National Kyushu Medical Center, Fukuoka); M. Yamamoto (Tokyo Women's Medical University Hospital, Tokyo); S. Kudo (Showa University Hospital, Yokohama); M. Watanabe (Kitasato University Hospital, Kanagawa); J. Nagao (Toho University Hospital Ohashi Medical Center, Tokyo); T. Nonami (Aichi Medical University Hospital, Aichi); S. Ono (National Defense Medical College Hospital, Saitama); M. Shibazaki (Tokyo Yamate Medical Center, Tokyo); K. Yamaguchi (University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Fukuoka); H. Baba (Kumamoto University Hospital, Kumamoto); I. Endo (Yokohama City University Hospital, Kanagawa); Y. Kitagawa (Keio University Hospital, Tokyo); S. Natsugoe (Kagoshima University Hospital, Kagoshima); K. Shirouzu (Kurume University Hospital, Fukuoka); G. Wakabayashi (Iwate Medical University Hospital, Iwate); H. Fujii (University of Yamanashi Hospital, Yamanashi); K. Hanazaki (Kochi Medical University Hospital, Kochi); Y. Sasaki (Yao Municipal Hospital, Osaka); K. Yoshida (Gifu University Hospital, Gifu).

We thank all patients and their relatives for participating in this study, and all medical staff at the 39 participating sites for their cooperation. We also thank Prof Yasuhiko Mohri, Department of Gastrointestinal and Pediatric Surgery, Mie University for his assistance with data management, Prof Yukinori Kurokawa, Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka University for providing a study protocol on antimicrobial prophylaxis in gastric cancer surgery, Prof Mitsuru Yanai, Department of General Medicine, Nihon University for his assistance with data interpretation, Prof Masashi Fujii, Department of Digestive Surgery, Nihon University for his statistical review, and Prof. Satoshi Hori, Department of Infection Control Science, Juntendo University for his critical review.

Funding

This trial was funded by a grant from the Japan Society for Surgical Infection, Tokyo, Japan, which is a non-profit organization established to control surgery-related infections, initiated and sponsored this study, but had no role in the study design or the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; or decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Concept and design: TT, MO, HM, and YS. Acquisition or interpretation of data: TT, MO, TI, MS, SI, TK, and SK. Drafting of the manuscript: TT, and OA. Critical revision of the manuscript: TT, MO, Shibata, MK, and YS. Statistical analysis: TS.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tadatoshi Takayama.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations

This Study Was Registered With the University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN)-CTR (https://www.umin.ac.jp), Identification Number 000002852.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (TIF 97 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Takayama, T., Aramaki, O., Shibata, T. et al. Antimicrobial prophylaxis for 1 day versus 3 days in liver cancer surgery: a randomized controlled non-inferiority trial. Surg Today 49, 859–869 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-019-01813-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-019-01813-w

Keywords

Navigation