Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Cancer-induced spiculation on computed tomography: a significant preoperative prognostic factor for colorectal cancer

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgery Today Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Cancer-induced spiculation (CIS) on computed tomography, which is reticular or linear opacification of the pericolorectal fat tissues around the cancer site, is generally regarded as cancer infiltration into T3 or T4, but its clinicopathological significance is unknown. This study examines the correlation between CIS and clinicopathological findings to establish its prognostic value.

Methods

The subjects of this retrospective study were 335 patients with colorectal cancer (CRC), who underwent curative surgery between January, 2010 and December, 2011, at the National Defense Medical College Hospital in Saitama Prefecture, Japan.

Results

The level of interobserver agreement in the evaluation of CIS was substantial (83%; kappa value, 0.65). The presence of CIS was specific for T3/T4 disease (positive predictive value, 88.3%), and was significantly associated with tumor size and venous invasion. The 5-year relapse-free survival rate was significantly lower in patients with CIS than in those without CIS (68.6% and 84.0%, respectively, p = 0.001). Subgroup analysis revealed remarkable prognostic differences in patients with stage III and T3 disease. Multivariate analysis revealed that CIS was a significant independent prognostic factor.

Conclusions

CIS was a significant preoperative prognostic factor and could be useful in the selection of preoperative therapy for patients with CRC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Balthazar EJ, Megibow AJ, Hulnick D, Naidich DP. Carcinoma of the colon: detection and preoperative staging by CT. AJR. 1988;150(2):301–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Freeny PC, Marks WM, Ryan JA, Bolen JW. Colorectal carcinoma evaluation with CT: preoperative staging and detection of postoperative recurrence. Radiology. 1986;158(2):347–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Thompson WM, Halvorsen RA, Foster WL Jr, Roberts L, Gibbons R. Preoperative and postoperative CT staging of rectosigmoid carcinoma. AJR. 1986;146(4):703–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Party MRCOCW. Surgical resection with or without preoperative chemotherapy in oesophageal cancer: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2002;359(9319):1727–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cunningham D, Allum WH, Stenning SP, Thompson JN, Van de Velde CJ, Nicolson M, et al. Perioperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(1):11–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Foxtrot Collaborative G. Feasibility of preoperative chemotherapy for locally advanced, operable colon cancer: the pilot phase of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13(11):1152–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Huang L, Li TJ, Zhang JW, Liu S, Fu BS, Liu W. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery versus surgery alone for colorectal cancer: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Medicine. 2014;93(28):e231.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Sebag-Montefiore D, Stephens RJ, Steele R, Monson J, Grieve R, Khanna S, et al. Preoperative radiotherapy versus selective postoperative chemoradiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer (MRC CR07 and NCIC-CTG C016): a multicentre, randomised trial. Lancet. 2009;373(9666):811–20.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Smith NJ, Bees N, Barbachano Y, Norman AR, Swift RI, Brown G. Preoperative computed tomography staging of nonmetastatic colon cancer predicts outcome: implications for clinical trials. Br J Cancer. 2007;96(7):1030–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33(1):159–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hulsmans FJ, Tio TL, Fockens P, Bosma A, Tytgat GN. Assessment of tumor infiltration depth in rectal cancer with transrectal sonography: caution is necessary. Radiology. 1994;190(3):715–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Utano K, Endo K, Togashi K, Sasaki J, Kawamura HJ, Horie H, et al. Preoperative T staging of colorectal cancer by CT colonography. Dis Colon Rect. 2008;51(6):875–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Augsten M. Cancer-associated fibroblasts as another polarized cell type of the tumor microenvironment. Front Oncol. 2014;4:62.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Bhowmick NA, Neilson EG, Moses HL. Stromal fibroblasts in cancer initiation and progression. Nature. 2004;432(7015):332–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Hanahan D, Coussens LM. Accessories to the crime: functions of cells recruited to the tumor microenvironment. Cancer Cell. 2012;21(3):309–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Pietras K, Ostman A. Hallmarks of cancer: interactions with the tumor stroma. Exp Cell Res. 2010;316(8):1324–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Shimoda M, Mellody KT, Orimo A. Carcinoma-associated fibroblasts are a rate-limiting determinant for tumour progression. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2010;21(1):19–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Calon A, Lonardo E, Berenguer-Llergo A, Espinet E, Hernando-Momblona X, Iglesias M, et al. Stromal gene expression defines poor-prognosis subtypes in colorectal cancer. Nat Genet. 2015;47(4):320–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Isella C, Terrasi A, Bellomo SE, Petti C, Galatola G, Muratore A, et al. Stromal contribution to the colorectal cancer transcriptome. Nat Genet. 2015;47(4):312–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. West NP, Dattani M, McShane P, Hutchins G, Grabsch J, Mueller W, et al. The proportion of tumour cells is an independent predictor for survival in colorectal cancer patients. Br J Cancer. 2010;102(10):1519–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Kapiteijn E, Marijnen CA, Nagtegaal ID, Putter H, Steup WH, Wiggers T, et al. Preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for resectable rectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2001;345(9):638–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Finlay IG, Meek D, Brunton F, McArdle CS. Growth rate of hepatic metastases in colorectal carcinoma. Br J Surg. 1988;75(7):641–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Tanaka K, Shimada H, Miura M, Fujii Y, Yamaguchi S, Endo I, et al. Metastatic tumor doubling time: most important prehepatectomy predictor of survival and nonrecurrence of hepatic colorectal cancer metastasis. World J Surg. 2004;28(3):263–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Nozoe T, Mori E, Takahashi I, Ezaki T. Preoperative elevation of serum C-reactive protein as an independent prognostic indicator of colorectal carcinoma. Surg Today. 2008;38(7):597–602.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Chiang SF, Hung HY, Tang R, Changchien CR, Chen JS, You YT, et al. Can neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio predict the survival of colorectal cancer patients who have received curative surgery electively? Int J Colorect Dis. 2012;27(10):1347–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Noh GT, Han J, Cho MS, Hur H, Min BS, Lee KY, et al. Impact of the prognostic nutritional index on the recovery and long-term oncologic outcome of patients with colorectal cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2017;143(7):1235–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, National Defense Medical College, 3-2, Namiki, Tokorozawa, Saitama, 359-8513, Japan

    Tadakazu Ao, Yoshiki Kajiwara, Eiji Shinto, Satsuki Mochizuki, Koichi Okamoto, Masato Yamadera, Keisuke Yonemura & Hideki Ueno

  2. Dotter Interventional Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, 97239, USA

    Kentaro Yamada

Authors
  1. Tadakazu Ao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yoshiki Kajiwara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kentaro Yamada
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Eiji Shinto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Satsuki Mochizuki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Koichi Okamoto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Masato Yamadera
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Keisuke Yonemura
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Hideki Ueno
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yoshiki Kajiwara.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Tadakazu Ao and his co-authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ao, T., Kajiwara, Y., Yamada, K. et al. Cancer-induced spiculation on computed tomography: a significant preoperative prognostic factor for colorectal cancer. Surg Today 49, 629–636 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-019-01780-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-019-01780-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation