Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Classification of remnant stomach shape after distal gastrectomy with Billroth-I reconstruction and a comparison of the postoperative outcomes

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgery Today Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To classify the shape of the remnant stomach after Billroth-I (B-I) reconstruction and evaluate the relationship between the shape of the remnant stomach and the postoperative clinical outcomes.

Methods

One hundred and ninety-five consecutive patients with gastric cancer underwent distal gastrectomy with B-I reconstruction between May 2006 and October 2014. We retrospectively reviewed their medical records and radiological findings. Finally, the shapes of the remnant stomach of 150 patients were classified as either straight type (type A) or stagnant type (type B). The clinical outcomes were compared with respect to the types of remnant stomach.

Results

The incidence of anastomotic leakage was significantly higher in the type A group than in the type B group (9.4 vs. 1.5%, p = 0.044). The body weight change ratio after surgery was significantly lower in the type B group than in the type A group [p = 0.0068, two-way repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA)], while the serum albumin levels showed marginally significant improvement in the type B group compared with the type A group (p = 0.0542, two-way repeated measures ANOVA).

Conclusion

The shape of the remnant stomach after distal gastrectomy with B-I reconstruction might influence the degree of anastomotic leakage and long-term nutritional status.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stewart BW, Wild CP. World cancer report 2014. 2014.

  2. Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma. 3rd English ed. Gastric Cancer 2011;14:101–12.

  3. Fujita J, Takahashi M, Urushihara T, Tanabe K, Kodera Y, Nakada K, et al. Assessment of postoperative quality of life following pylorus-preserving gastrectomy and Billroth-I distal gastrectomy in gastric cancer patients: results of the nationwide postgastrectomy syndrome assessment study. Gastric Cancer. 2016;19:302–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Terashima M, Tanabe K, Yoshida M, Kawahira H, Inada T, Nakada K, et al. Postgastrectomy Syndrome Assessment Scale (PGSAS)-45 and changes in body weight are useful tools for evaluation of reconstruction methods following distal gastrectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21(Suppl 3):S370-378.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kim BJ, O’Connell T. Gastroduodenostomy after gastric resection for cancer. Am Surg. 1999;65:905–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Shinoto K, Ochiai T, Suzuki T, Okazumi S, Ozaki M. Effectiveness of Roux-en-Y reconstruction after distal gastrectomy based on an assessment of biliary kinetics. Surg Today. 2003;33:169–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fukuhara K, Osugi H, Takada N, Takemura M, Higashino M, Kinoshita H. Reconstructive procedure after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer that best prevents duodenogastroesophageal reflux. World J Surg. 2002;26:1452–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ishikawa M, Kitayama J, Kaizaki S, Nakayama H, Ishigami H, Nagawa H, et al. Prospective randomized trial comparing Billroth I and Roux-en-Y procedures after distal gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma. World J Surg. 2005;29:1415–20. (discussion 1421)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hirao M, Takiguchi S, Imamura H, Yamamoto K, Kurokawa Y, Doki Y, et al. Comparison of Billroth I and Roux-en-Y reconstruction after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: One-year postoperative effects assessed by a multi-institutional rct. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:1591–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hoya Y, Mitsumori N, Yanaga K. The advantages and disadvantages of a Roux-en-Y reconstruction after a distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Surg Today. 2009;39:647–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nunobe S, Okaro A, Sasako M, Saka M, Fukagawa T, Sano T, et al. Billroth I versus Roux-en-Y reconstructions: a quality-of-life survey at 5 years. Int J Clin Oncol. 2007;12:433–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Makuuchi M, et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg. 2009;250:187–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kundel HL, Polansky M. Measurement of observer agreement. Radiology. 2003;228:303–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Zong L, Chen P. Billroth I vs. Billroth II vs. Roux-en-Y following distal gastrectomy: a meta-analysis based on 15 studies. Hepatogastroenterology. 2011;58:1413–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kim CH, Song KY, Park CH, Seo YJ, Park SM, Kim JJ. A comparison of outcomes of three reconstruction methods after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy. J Gastric Cancer. 2015;15:46–52.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Okabe Y, Ishida Y, Kuraoka K, Ushijima T, Tsuruta O. Endoscopic bile duct and/or pancreatic duct cannulation technique for patients with surgically altered gastrointestinal anatomy. Dig Endosc. 2014;26(Suppl 2):122–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Osugi H, Fukuhara K, Takada N, Takemura M, Kinoshita H. Reconstructive procedure after distal gastrectomy to prevent remnant gastritis. Hepatogastroenterology. 2004;51:1215–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Xiong JJ, Altaf K, Liu XB, et al. Roux-en-Y versus Billroth I reconstruction after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19:1124–34.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Mathias JR, Fernandez A, Sninsky CA, Clench MH, Davis RH. Nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain after Roux-en-y anastomosis: Motility of the jejunal limb. Gastroenterology. 1985;88:101–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Miedema BW, Kelly KA, Camilleri M, Hanson RB, Zinsmeister AR, Brown ML, et al. Human gastric and jejunal transit and motility after roux gastrojejunostomy. Gastroenterology. 1992;103:1133–43.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Mittermair R, Sucher R, Perathoner A, Wykypiel H. Routine upper gastrointestinal swallow studies after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy are unnecessary. Am J Surg. 2014;207:897–901.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kim TH, Kim JH, Shin CI, Kim SH, Han JK, Choi BI. CT findings suggesting anastomotic leak and predicting the recovery period following gastric surgery. Eur Radiol. 2015;25:1958–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kojima K, Yamada H, Inokuchi M, et al. A comparison of Roux-en-Y and Billroth-I reconstruction after laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy. Ann Surg. 2008;247:962–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Nomura E, Lee SW, Bouras G, Tokuhara T, Hayashi M, Tanigawa N, et al. Functional outcomes according to the size of the gastric remnant and type of reconstruction following laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 2011;14:279–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Nomura E, Lee SW, Tokuhara T, Nitta T, Kawai M, Uchiyama K. Functional outcomes according to the size of the gastric remnant and the type of reconstruction following distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: an investigation including total gastrectomy. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2013;43:1195–202.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Pablo V, Jose MR, Marcos B, Gerardo D, Albert G, Manuel P, Luios G. Residual gastric volume estimated with a new radiological volumetric model: relationship with weight loss after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2014;24:359–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sachiko Kaida.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None of the authors has any conflicts of interest or any financial ties to disclose.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kaida, S., Yamaguchi, T., Takebayashi, K. et al. Classification of remnant stomach shape after distal gastrectomy with Billroth-I reconstruction and a comparison of the postoperative outcomes. Surg Today 48, 909–915 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-018-1676-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-018-1676-1

Keywords

Navigation