Skip to main content

Characteristics and prognosis of rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors: an analysis of registry data

Abstract

Purpose

Rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are rare. Accordingly, their clinical features are not well-documented and optimal treatment has not been established. The objective of this study is to clarify the rates and patterns of recurrence after surgical resection of rectal GISTs, with a focus on outcomes and therapeutic modalities.

Methods

The registry was designed to collect data on rectal GISTs recorded between January, 2003 and December, 2007 at 40 participating institutions of the Kinki GIST Study Group. The principal variables were the rates and patterns of recurrence of rectal GISTs. Other study variables were age, sex, tumor size, mitotic count, distance from the anal verge, tumor location, surgical procedures, surgical margins, and recurrence-free survival.

Results

Twenty-four cases were registered, 11 (45.8%) of which were classified as high-risk by the modified NIH criteria. Locoregional recurrence (7/23, 30.4%) was the predominant recurrence pattern after curative resection, with rates that did not differ after local excision (33.3%; 3/9) vs. extended resection (28.6%; 4/14). The recurrence rates were high (25.0%) even for patients with low-risk disease. There was only one case of recurrence among patients who received perioperative treatment with imatinib.

Conclusions

Rectal GISTs showed high rates of local recurrence regardless of the surgical procedure. Perioperative treatment with imatinib may improve outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. Joensuu H. Risk stratification of patients diagnosed with gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Hum Pathol. 2008;39:1411–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Miettinen M, Lasota J. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: pathology and prognosis at different sites. Semin Diagn Pathol. 2006;23:70–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Joensuu H, Roberts PJ, Sarlomo-Rikala M, Andersson LC, Tervahartiala P, Tuveson D, et al. Effect of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor STI571 in a patient with a metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:1052–6.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Demetri GD, van Oosterom AT, Garrett CR, Blackstein ME, Shah MH, Verweij J, et al. Efficacy and safety of sunitinib in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumour after failure of imatinib: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2006;368:1329–38.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. George S, Wang Q, Heinrich MC, Corless CL, Zhu M, Butrynski JE, et al. Efficacy and safety of regorafenib in patients with metastatic and/or unresectable GI stromal tumor after failure of imatinib and sunitinib: a multicenter phase II trial. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:2401–7.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Demetri GD, Reichardt P, Kang YK, Blay JY, Rutkowski P, Gelderblom H, et al. Efficacy and safety of regorafenib for advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumours after failure of imatinib and sunitinib (GRID): an international, multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2013;381:295–302.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dematteo RP, Ballman KV, Antonescu CR, Maki RG, Pisters PW, Demetri GD, et al. Adjuvant imatinib mesylate after resection of localised, primary gastrointestinal stromal tumour: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2009;373:1097–104.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Joensuu H, Eriksson M, Sundby Hall K, Hartmann JT, Pink D, Schutte J, et al. One vs three years of adjuvant imatinib for operable gastrointestinal stromal tumor: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2012;307:1265–72.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang D, Zhang Q, Blanke CD, Demetri GD, Heinrich MC, Watson JC, et al. Phase II trial of neoadjuvant/adjuvant imatinib mesylate for advanced primary and metastatic/recurrent operable gastrointestinal stromal tumors: long-term follow-up results of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 0132. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:1074–80.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Eisenberg BL, Harris J, Blanke CD, Demetri GD, Heinrich MC, Watson JC, et al. Phase II trial of neoadjuvant/adjuvant imatinib mesylate (IM) for advanced primary and metastatic/recurrent operable gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST): early results of RTOG 0132/ACRIN 6665. J Surg Oncol. 2009;99:42–7.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Tielen R, Verhoef C, van Coevorden F, Reyners AK, van der Graaf WT, Bonenkamp JJ, et al. Surgical management of rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors. J Surg Oncol. 2013;107:320–3.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Changchien CR, Wu MC, Tasi WS, Tang R, Chiang JM, Chen JS, et al. Evaluation of prognosis for malignant rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumor by clinical parameters and immunohistochemical staining. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;47:1922–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Joensuu H, Vehtari A, Riihimaki J, Nishida T, Steigen SE, Brabec P, et al. Risk of recurrence of gastrointestinal stromal tumour after surgery: an analysis of pooled population-based cohorts. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13:265–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. DeMatteo RP, Lewis JJ, Leung D, Mudan SS, Woodruff JM, Brennan MF. Two hundred gastrointestinal stromal tumors: recurrence patterns and prognostic factors for survival. Ann Surg. 2000;231:51–8.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Katayama H, Kurokawa Y, Nakamura K, Ito H, Kanemitsu Y, Masuda N, et al. Extended Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: Japan Clinical Oncology Group postoperative complications criteria. Surg Today. 2016;46:668–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gervaz P, Huber O, Morel P. Surgical management of gastrointestinal stromal tumours. Br J Surg. 2009;96:567–78.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Huynh TK, Meeus P, Cassier P, Bouche O, Lardiere-Deguelte S, Adenis A, et al. Primary localized rectal/pararectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors: results of surgical and multimodal therapy from the French Sarcoma Group. BMC Cancer. 2014;14:156.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Rutkowski P, Gronchi A, Hohenberger P, Bonvalot S, Schoffski P, Bauer S, et al. Neoadjuvant imatinib in locally advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST): the EORTC STBSG experience. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:2937–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang JP, Wang T, Huang MJ, Wang L, Kang L, Wu XJ. The role of neoadjuvant imatinib mesylate therapy in sphincter-preserving procedures for anorectal gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Am J Clin Oncol. 2011;34:314–6.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Fujimoto Y, Akiyoshi T, Konishi T, Nagayama S, Fukunaga Y, Ueno M. Laparoscopic sphincter-preserving surgery (intersphincteric resection) after neoadjuvant imatinib treatment for gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) of the rectum. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2014;29:111–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Jakob J, Mussi C, Ronellenfitsch U, Wardelmann E, Negri T, Gronchi A, et al. Gastrointestinal stromal tumor of the rectum: results of surgical and multimodality therapy in the era of imatinib. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:586–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhou Z, Chen Z, Chen M, Wang R, Yin Y, Yao Y. Clinicopathologic factors predicting outcomes in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the rectum and colon. Tumour Biol. 2014;35:4357–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2012;23 Suppl 7:vii49–55.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank all of the participating patients and investigators. This study was performed by the Kinki GIST Study Group. Participating institutions (listed according to the number of patients included) are as follows: Osaka University Hospital, Osaka Red Cross Hospital, Osaka General Medical Center, Toyonaka Municipal Hospital, Higashiosaka City General Hospital, Shizuoka General Hospital, National Hospital Organization Osaka National Hospital, Osaka Police Hospital, Sakai Municipal Hospital, Kanazawa Medical University Hospital, Kitano Hospital, Juntendo University Shizuoka Hospital, Osaka Rosai Hospital, Osaka Medical College Hospital, Kinki University Hospital, National Hospital Organization Osaka Minami Medical Center, Osaka General Medical Center, and Kansai Medical University Takii Hospital.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masayoshi Yasui.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

Toshimasa Tsujinaka had a consultancy in Taiho Pharmaceutical Co. and Yakult Co., was on the speaker’s bureau for Taiho Pharma. Co., Otsuka Co., Abott Co. and Johnson & Johnson and received honoraria for manuscript preparation from MSD.; Tsuyoshi Takahashi received honoraria from Novaritis, Pfizer and Bayer for a lecture and received research funding from SBI Pharma. The remaining authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yasui, M., Tsujinaka, T., Mori, M. et al. Characteristics and prognosis of rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors: an analysis of registry data. Surg Today 47, 1188–1194 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-017-1524-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-017-1524-8

Keywords

  • Rectum
  • Gastrointestinal stromal tumors
  • Recurrence