Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Efficacy of low-dose computed tomography screening for lung cancer: the current state of evidence of mortality reduction

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Surgery Today Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The interim and final results of randomized controlled trials on the efficacy of lung cancer computed tomography (CT) screening have been reported recently from Western countries. The outcome of the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) demonstrated the efficacy of low-dose thoracic CT screening for heavy smokers; however, other studies have found no apparent reduction in the mortality rate, and the outcome of the NELSON study is awaited. To date, a few studies have reported on the efficacy of lung cancer CT screening for non-/light smokers. A report from the Hitachi district, which is an ecological/time series study where non-/light smokers account for approximately half of the CT screening examinees, was published in 2012, with an outcome suggesting efficacy. Currently, a randomized controlled trial (JECS Study) is underway in Japan with non-/light smokers as the subjects, and this trial is very important in terms of cancer prevention.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sagawa M, Nakayama T, Endo C, Saito H, Sobue T, Hamajima C. Japanese guideline for lung cancer screening. 2006. http://canscreen.ncc.go.jp/pdf/guideline/guide_lung070111.pdf. Accessed 9 May 2016.

  2. Infante M, Cavuto S, Lutman FR, Brambilla G, Chiesa G, Ceresoli G, et al. A randomized study of lung cancer screening with spiral computed tomography: three-year results from the DANTE trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009;180:445–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Becker N, Motsch E, Gross ML, Eigentopf A, Heussel CP, Dienemann H, et al. Randomized study on early detection of lung cancer with MSCT in Germany: results of the first 3 years of follow-up after randomization. J Thorac Oncol. 2015;10:890–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Saghir Z, Dirksen A, Ashraf H, Bach KS, Brodersen J, Clementsen PF, et al. CT screening for lung cancer brings forward early disease. The randomised Danish Lung Cancer Screening Trial: status after five annual screening rounds with low-dose CT. Thorax. 2012;67:296–301.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Pastorino U, Rossi M, Rosato V, Marchianò A, Sverzellati N, Morosi C, et al. Annual or biennial CT screening versus observation in heavy smokers: 5-year results of the MILD trial. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2012;21:308–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Infante M, Cavuto S, Lutman FR, Passera E, Chiarenza M, Chiesa G, et al. Long-term follow-up results of the DANTE Trial, a randomized study of lung cancer screening with spiral computed tomography. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015;191:1166–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. The National Lung Screening Trial Research Team. Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Eng J Med. 2011;365:395–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Nawa T, Nakagawa T, Mizoue T, Kusano S, Chonan T, Hayashihara K, et al. A decrease in lung cancer mortality following the introduction of low-dose chest CT screening in Hitachi, Japan. Lung Cancer. 2012;78:225–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Naidich DP, Marshall CH, Gribbin C, Arams RS, McCauley DI. Low-dose CT of the lungs: preliminary observations. Radiology. 1990;175:729–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Iinuma T, Tateno Y, Matsumoto T, Yamamoto S, Matsumoto M. Preliminary specification of X-ray CT for lung cancer screening (LSCT) and its evaluation on risk-cost-effectiveness. Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi. 1992;52:182–90 (in Japanese with English abstract).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Katsura M, Matsuda I, Akahane M, Yasaka K, Hanaoka S, Akai H, et al. Model-based iterative reconstruction technique for ultralow-dose chest CT: comparison of pulmonary nodule detectability with the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique. Invest Radiol. 2013;48:206–12.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kaneko M, Eguchi K, Ohmatsu H, Kakinuma R, Naruke T, Suemasu K, et al. Peripheral lung cancer: screening and detection with low-dose spiral CT versus radiography. Radiology. 1996;201:798–802.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sone S, Takashima S, Li F, Yang Z, Honda T, Maruyama Y, et al. Mass screening for lung cancer with mobile spiral computed tomography scanner. Lancet. 1998;351:1242–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Henschke CI, Naidich DP, Yankelevitz DF, McGuinness G, McCauley DI, Smith JP, et al. Early lung cancer action project: initial findings on repeat screening. Cancer. 2001;92:153–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Henschke CI, Yankelevitz DF, Libby DM, Pasmantier MW, Smith JP, Miettinen OS, et al. Survival of patients with stage I lung cancer detected on CT screening. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:1763–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sone S, Nakayama T, Honda T, Tsushima K, Li F, Haniuda M, et al. Long-term follow-up study of a population-based 1996–1998 mass screening programme for lung cancer using mobile low-dose spiral computed tomography. Lung Cancer. 2007;58:329–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sagawa M, Usuda K, Sakuma T. The efficacy of cancer screening. Jpn J Clin Urol. 2010;64:881–8 (in Japanese with English abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Patz EF Jr, Goodman PC, Bepler G. Screening for lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:1627–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Swensen SJ, Jett JR, Hartman TE, Midthun DE, Mandrekar SJ, Hillman SL, et al. CT screening for lung cancer: five-year prospective experience. Radiology. 2005;235:259–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bach PB, Jett JR, Pastorino U, Tockman MS, Swensen SJ, Begg CB. Computed tomography screening and lung cancer outcomes. JAMA. 2007;297:953–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Field JK, Duffy SW, Baldwin DR, Whynes DK, Devaraj A, Brain KE, et al. UK Lung Cancer RCT Pilot Screening Trial: baseline findings from the screening arm provide evidence for the potential implementation of lung cancer screening. Thorax. 2016;71:161–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lopes Pegna A, Picozzi G, Falaschi F, Carrozzi L, Falchini M, Carozzi FM, et al. Four-year results of low-dose CT screening and nodule management in the ITALUNG trial. J Thorac Oncol. 2013;8:866–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Blanchon T, Bréchot JM, Grenier PA, Ferretti GR, Lemarié E, Milleron B, et al. Baseline results of the Depiscan study: a French randomized pilot trial of lung cancer screening comparing low dose CT scan (LDCT) and chest X-ray (CXR). Lung Cancer. 2007;58:50–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Xu DM, Gietema H, de Koning H, Vernhout R, Nackaerts K, Prokop M, et al. Nodule management protocol of the NELSON randomized lung cancer screening trial. Lung Cancer. 2006;54:177–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Horeweg N, van der Aalst CM, Thunnissen E, Nackaerts K, Weenink C, Groen HJ, et al. Characteristics of lung cancers detected by computer tomography screening in randomized NELSON trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013;187:848–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Horeweg N, Scholten ET, de Jong PA, van der Aalst CM, Weenink C, Lammers JW, et al. Detection of lung cancer through low-dose CT screening (NELSON): a prespecified analysis of screening test performance and interval cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15:1342–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Pinsky PF, Church TR, Izmirlian G, Kramer BS. The National Lung Screening Trial: results stratified by demographics, smoking history, and lung cancer histology. Cancer. 2013;119:3976–83.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Patz EF Jr, Greco E, Gatsonis C, Pinsky P, Kramer BS, Aberle DR. Lung cancer incidence and mortality in National Lung Screening Trial participants who underwent low-dose CT prevalence screening: a retrospective cohort analysis of a randomised, multicentre diagnostic screening trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17:590–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Moyer VA, US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for lung cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2014;160:330–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Peres J. Lung cancer screening: ready for prime time? J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011;103:89–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61:69–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Tsao AS, Tang XM, Sabloff B, Xiao L, Shigematsu H, Roth J, et al. Clinicopathologic characteristics of the EGFR gene mutation in non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2006;1:231–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Thun MJ, Hannan LM, Adams-Campbell LL, Boffetta P, Buring JE, Feskanich D, et al. Lung cancer occurrence in never-smokers: an analysis of 13 cohorts and 22 cancer registry studies. PLoS Med. 2008;5:e185.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Hattori A, Suzuki K, Takamochi K, Oh S. Clinical features of multiple lung cancers based on thin-section computed tomography: what are the appropriate surgical strategies for second lung cancers? Surg Today. 2015;45:189–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Suzuki S, Aokage K, Yoshida J, Ishii G, Matsumura Y, Haruki T, et al. Thin-section computed tomography findings of lung adenocarcinoma with inherent metastatic potential. Surg Today. 2016 (Epub ahead of print).

  36. Nakayama T, Suzuki T. The evaluation of the effectiveness of low dose helical computed tomography screening. Jpn J Lung Cancer. 2006;46:871–6 (in Japanese with English abstract).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Sagawa M, Nakayama T, Tanaka M, Sakuma T, Sobue T, JECS Study Group. A randomized controlled trial on the efficacy of thoracic CT screening for lung cancer in non-smokers and smokers of <30 pack-years aged 50–64 years (JECS Study): research design. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2012;42:1219–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was partially supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Cancer Research from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare; the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology; the National Cancer Center Research and Development Fund; and by the Practical Research for Innovative Cancer Control of the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development, AMED, Japan.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Motoyasu Sagawa.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

We declare no conflict of interest in association with this study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sagawa, M., Sugawara, T., Ishibashi, N. et al. Efficacy of low-dose computed tomography screening for lung cancer: the current state of evidence of mortality reduction. Surg Today 47, 783–788 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-016-1438-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-016-1438-x

Keywords

Navigation