Skip to main content
Log in

Comparisons of financial and short-term outcomes between laparoscopic and open hepatectomy: benefits for patients and hospitals

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgery Today Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purposes

This retrospective analysis compared the cost outcomes for both patients and hospitals, as well as the short-term outcomes, for laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH) and open hepatectomy (OH).

Methods

The subjects comprised 70 patients who underwent LH or OH. The total hospital charge was calculated using the Japanese lump-sum payment system according to the diagnosis procedure combination.

Results

Of the 70 patients, 10 in the LH group and 16 in the OH group underwent primary single limited/anatomic resection or left lateral sectoriectomy. The operation time, blood loss, and postoperative complications did not differ significantly between the two groups. The median [range] time of inflow occlusion was significantly longer [120 (50–194) vs. 57 (17–151) min, P = 0.03] and the postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter [5 (4–6) vs. 9 (5–12) days, P < 0.01] in the LH group than in the OH group, respectively. The mean ± standard deviation surgical costs (1307 ± 596 vs. 1054 ± 365 US$, P = 0.43) and total hospital charges (12046 ± 1174 vs. 11858 ± 2096 US$, P > 0.99) were similar in the LH and OH groups, respectively, although the charges per day were significantly higher in the LH group than in the OH group (1388 ± 217 vs. 1016 ± 134 US$, P < 0.01).

Conclusions

The costs to patients for LH are similar to those for OH. However, LH provides a financial advantage to hospitals due to a reduced hospital stay and comparable surgical costs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

LH:

Laparoscopic hepatectomy

OH:

Open hepatectomy

POD:

Postoperative day

SD:

Standard deviations

References

  1. Vibert E, Perniceni T, Levard H, Denet C, Shahri NK, Gayet B. Laparoscopic liver resection. Br J Surg. 2006;93:67–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Otsuka Y, Tsuchiya M, Maeda T, Katagiri T, Isii J, Tamura A, Yamazaki K, Kubota Y, Suzuki T, Kagami S, Kaneko H. Laparoscopic hepatectomy for liver tumors: proposals for standardization. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2009;16:720–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Nitta H, Sasaki A, Fujita T, Itabashi H, Hoshikawa K, Takahara T, Takahashi M, Nishizuka S, Wakabayashi G. Laparoscopy-assisted major liver resections employing a hanging technique: the original procedure. Ann Surg. 2010;251:450–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Nguyen KT, Marsh JW, Tsung A, Steel JJ, Gamblin TC, Geller DA. Comparative benefits of laparoscopic vs open hepatic resection: a critical appraisal. Arch Surg. 2011;146:348–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cannon RM, Brock GN, Marvin MR, Buell JF. Laparoscopic liver resection: an examination of our first 300 patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2011;213:501–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hwang DW, Han HS, Yoon YS, Cho JY, Kwon Y, Kim JH, Park JS, Yoon DS, Choi IS, Ahn KS, Kim YH, Kang KJ, Roh YH, Chu CW, Kim HC, Kang CM, Choi GH, Choi JS, Kim KS, Lee WJ, Yun SS, Kim HJ, Min SK, Lee HK, Song IS, Chun KS, Cho EH, Han SS, Park SJ. Laparoscopic major liver resection in Korea: a multicenter study. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2013;20:125–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Nguyen KT, Gamblin TC, Geller DA. World review of laparoscopic liver resection-2,804 patients. Ann Surg. 2009;250:831–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Koffron AJ, Auffenberg G, Kung R, Abecassis M. Evaluation of 300 minimally invasive liver resections at a single institution: less is more. Ann Surg. 2007;246:385–92 (discussion 92–4).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Polignano FM, Quyn AJ, de Figueiredo RS, Henderson NA, Kulli C, Tait IS. Laparoscopic versus open liver segmentectomy: prospective, case-matched, intention-to-treat analysis of clinical outcomes and cost effectiveness. Surg Endosc. 2008;22:2564–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Vanounou T, Steel JL, Nguyen KT, Tsung A, Marsh JW, Geller DA, Gamblin TC. Comparing the clinical and economic impact of laparoscopic versus open liver resection. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:998–1009.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Park JS, Han HS, Hwang DW, Yoon YS, Cho JY, Koh YS, Kwon CH, Kim KS, Kim SB, Kim YH, Kim HC, Chu CW, Lee DS, Kim HJ, Park SJ, Han SS, Song TJ, Ahn YJ, Yoo YK, Yu HC, Yoon DS, Lee MK, Lee HK, Min SK, Jeong CY, Hong SC, Choi IS, Hur KY. Current status of laparoscopic liver resection in Korea. J Korean Med Sci. 2012;27:767–71.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Imura S, Shimada M, Utsunomiya T, Morine Y, Wakabayashi G, Kaneko H. Current status of laparoscopic liver surgery in Japan: results of a multicenter Japanese experience. Surg Today. 2014;44:1214–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Moriwaki M, Kakehashi M, Nishiki M. A study on the contribution of medical expense disclosure to patient satisfaction. J Health Sci Hiroshima Univ. 2005;5:1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wong YN, Egleston BL, Sachdeva K, Eghan N, Pirollo M, Stump TK, Beck JR, Armstrong K, Schwartz JS, Meropol NJ. Cancer patients’ trade-offs among efficacy, toxicity, and out-of-pocket cost in the curative and noncurative setting. Med Care. 2013;51:838–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Couinaud C. Surgical anatomy of the liver revisited. C. Couinaud, Paris. 1989. ISBN: 9782903672010.

  16. Makuuchi M, Kosuge T, Takayama T, Yamazaki S, Kakazu T, Miyagawa S, Kawasaki S. Surgery for small liver cancers. Semin Surg Oncol. 1993;9:298–304.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hasegawa K, Takahashi M, Ohba M, Kaneko J, Aoki T, Sakamoto Y, Sugawara Y, Kokudo N. Perioperative chemotherapy and liver resection for hepatic metastases of colorectal cancer. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2012.

  18. Pringle JHV. Notes on the arrest of hepatic hemorrhage due to trauma. Ann Surg. 1908;48:541–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Yasunaga H, Ide H, Imamura T, Ohe K. Impact of the Japanese diagnosis procedure combination-based payment system on cardiovascular medicine-related costs. Int Heart J. 2005;46:855–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, de Santibanes E, Pekolj J, Slankamenac K, Bassi C, Graf R, Vonlanthen R, Padbury R, Cameron JL, Makuuchi M. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg. 2009;250:187–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Peabody JW, Florentino J, Shimkhada R, Solon O, Quimbo S. Quality variation and its impact on costs and satisfaction: evidence from the QIDS study. Med Care. 2010;48:25–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kaneko H, Takagi S, Otsuka Y, Tsuchiya M, Tamura A, Katagiri T, Maeda T, Shiba T. Laparoscopic liver resection of hepatocellular carcinoma. Am J Surg. 2005;189:190–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Castaing D, Vibert E, Ricca L, Azoulay D, Adam R, Gayet B. Oncologic results of laparoscopic versus open hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases in two specialized centers. Ann Surg. 2009;250:849–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Belli G, Limongelli P, Fantini C, D’Agostino A, Cioffi L, Belli A, Russo G. Laparoscopic and open treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis. Br J Surg. 2009;96:1041–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kawaguchi Y, Tanaka N, Kokudo N. Surgical value of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in laparoscopic hepatectomy using energy devices. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2014;21:78–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hasegawa K, Kokudo N, Imamura H, Matsuyama Y, Aoki T, Minagawa M, Sano K, Sugawara Y, Takayama T, Makuuchi M. Prognostic impact of anatomic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg. 2005;242:252–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Eguchi S, Kanematsu T, Arii S, Okazaki M, Okita K, Omata M, Ikai I, Kudo M, Kojiro M, Makuuchi M, Monden M, Matsuyama Y, Nakanuma Y, Takayasu K. Comparison of the outcomes between an anatomical subsegmentectomy and a non-anatomical minor hepatectomy for single hepatocellular carcinomas based on a Japanese nationwide survey. Surgery. 2008;143:469–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ishizawa T, Gumbs AA, Kokudo N, Gayet B. Laparoscopic segmentectomy of the liver: from segment I to VIII. Ann Surg. 2012;256:959–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Croome KP, Yamashita MH. Laparoscopic vs open hepatic resection for benign and malignant tumors: an updated meta-analysis. Arch Surg. 2010;145:1109–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Vigano L, Laurent A, Tayar C, Tomatis M, Ponti A, Cherqui D. The learning curve in laparoscopic liver resection: improved feasibility and reproducibility. Ann Surg. 2009;250:772–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Ms. Junko Ibato, Mr. Hidetoshi Shimada, Mr. Takayuki Ota, Mr. Nozomu Senbonmatsu, Mr. Yui Shinno, Mr. Keizo Katagiri, Dr. Kyoji Ito, Dr. Keishi Kawasaki, and Dr. Yosuke Suka for the acquisition of the financial data and helpful insights.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yoshikuni Kawaguchi.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 11 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kawaguchi, Y., Otsuka, Y., Kaneko, H. et al. Comparisons of financial and short-term outcomes between laparoscopic and open hepatectomy: benefits for patients and hospitals. Surg Today 46, 535–542 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-015-1189-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-015-1189-0

Keywords

Navigation