Skip to main content

A single-center study of vascular access sites for intravenous ports

Surgery Today volume 44, pages 723–731 (2014)Cite this article

Abstract

Purpose

This study evaluated the use of intravenous ports and provides a guide related to clinical decision making.

Methods

This study retrospectively reviewed 1505 patients who had received intravenous ports at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital in 2006. The relationships between the complications and entry routes were assessed. The intervention-free periods were also determined and compared. The patients were followed up until June 2010.

Results

Of the 1543 procedures performed, 412 were reinterventions to treat complications, most of which corresponded to fewer than 0.1 episodes per 1000 catheter-days; these were not associated with any particular entry route. There was a higher catheter fracture rate when the right subclavian vein was chosen as the entry vessel (p < 0.05). The intervention-free period ranged from 207 to 533 days.

Conclusion

The subclavian vein is not recommended for the use of intravenous ports. There is not only a higher risk of iatrogenic pneumothorax or hemothorax using this entry route but also a higher fracture rate, which may be caused by pinch-off syndrome. The greater saphenous vein should only be considered when the patient has superior vena cava syndrome. However, a higher incidence of infection and a lower device survival rate should be expected with this location.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. Charvát J, Linke Z, Horáèková M, Prausová J. Implantation of central venous ports with catheter insertion via the right internal jugular vein in oncology patients: single center experience. Support Care Cancer. 2006;14(11):1162–5 (Epub 2006 Apr 5).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bow EJ, Klipatrick MG, Clinch JJ. Totally implantable venous access ports systems for patients receiving chemotherapy for solid tissue malignancies: a randomized controlled clinical trial examining the safety, efficacy, costs, and impact on quality of life. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17(4):1267.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Broviac JW, Cole JJ, Scribner BH. A silicone rubber atrial catheter for prolonged parenteral alimentation. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1973;136:602–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hickman RO, Buckner CD, Clift RA, Sanders JE, Stewart P, Thomas ED. A modified right atrial catheter for access to the venous system in marrow transplant recipients. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1979;148:871–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Niederhuber JE, Ensminger W, Gyves JW, Liepman M, Doan K, Cozzi E. Totally implanted venous and arterial access system to replace external catheters in cancer treatment. Surgery. 1982;92(4):706–12.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Shankar KR, Anbu AT, Losty PD. Use of the gonadal vein in children with difficult central venous access: a novel technique. J Pediatr Surg. 2001;36(6):E3.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Aubaniac R. Subclavian intravenous injection; advantages and technique. Presse Med. 1952;60(68):1456.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Eastridge BJ, Lefor AT. Complications of indwelling venous access devices in cancer patients. J Clin Oncol. 1995;13:233–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chang CL, Chen HH, Lin SE. Catheter fracture and cardiac migration—an unusual fracture site of totally implantable venous devices: report of two cases. Chang Gung Med J. 2005;28(6):425–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kincaid EH, Davis PW, Chang MC, Fenstermaker JM, Pennell TC. “Blind” placement of long-term central venous access devices: report of 589 consecutive procedures. Am Surg. 1999;65(6):520–3 (discussion 523–4).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Aitken DR, Minton JP. The “pinch-off sign”: a warning of impending problems with permanent subclavian catheters. Am J Surg. 1984;148:633–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rauthe G, Altmann C. Complications in connection with venous port system: prevent and therapy. Eur J Surg Oncol. 1998;24(3):192–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Collin GR, Ahmadinejad AS, Misse E. Spontaneous migration of subcutaneous central venous catheters. Am Surg. 1997;63(4):322–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Vasquez RM, Brodski EG. Primary and secondary malposition of silicone central venous catheter. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1985;81:22–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chang L, Tsai JS, Huang SJ, Shih CC. Evaluation of infectious complications of the implantable venous access system in a general oncologic population. Am J Infect Control. 2003;31(1):34–9.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Povoski SP. A prospective analysis of the cephalic vein cut-down approach for chronic indwelling central venous access in 100 consecutive cancer patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2000;7(7):496–502.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Teichgräber UK, Gebauer B, Benter T, Wagner HJ. Central venous access catheters: radiological management of complications. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2003;26(4):321–33.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University, 5 Fu-Shing Street, Kueishan, 333, Taoyuan, Taiwan

    Ching-Feng Wu, Po-Jen Ko, Ching-Yang Wu, Yun-Hen Liu, Tsung-Chi Kao, Sheng-Yueh Yu, Hao-Jui Li & Hung-Chang Hsieh

Authors
  1. Ching-Feng Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Po-Jen Ko
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ching-Yang Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yun-Hen Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Tsung-Chi Kao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Sheng-Yueh Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Hao-Jui Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Hung-Chang Hsieh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ching-Yang Wu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wu, CF., Ko, PJ., Wu, CY. et al. A single-center study of vascular access sites for intravenous ports. Surg Today 44, 723–731 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-013-0610-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-013-0610-9

Keywords

  • Inferior Vena Cava
  • Internal Jugular Vein
  • Superior Vena Cava
  • Subclavian Vein
  • Right Atrium