Skip to main content
Log in

Minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: an updated review

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Surgery Today Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The surgical, postoperative and oncologic outcomes of minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for esophageal cancer were reviewed to clarify the benefits of this surgical modality.

Methods

A systematic literature search was performed using synonyms for minimally invasive or thoracoscopic esophagectomy. There were 18 retrospective cohort studies and 3 meta-analyses retrieved in this review.

Results

There are several minimally invasive approaches for esophageal cancer. Total MIE using both the thoracoscopic and laparoscopic approach is increasingly performed. A longer operative time and less blood loss are observed with MIE in comparison to open esophagectomy (OE). Although the benefit of MIE for reducing morbidity and mortality rates is still under debate, a shorter hospital stay was common among the studies. The oncologic outcomes of MIE were not inferior to OE, while the number of retrieved lymph nodes was greater in MIE than OE in several studies.

Conclusion

Total MIE using a combined thoracoscopic and laparoscopic approach can be performed safely, although the benefits for short-term outcomes are still controversial. Oncologic outcomes are favorable and MIE may have an advantage in lymph node dissection over OE. The benefits of MIE should therefore be confirmed by randomized controlled trials.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Akutsu Y, Matsubara H. The significance of lymph node status as a prognostic factor for esophageal cancer. Surg Today. 2011;41:1190–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Morita M, Yoshida R, Ikeda K, Egashira A, Oki E, Sadanaga N, et al. Advances in esophageal cancer surgery in Japan: an analysis of 1000 consecutive patients treated at a single institute. Surgery. 2008;143:499–508.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Jamieson GG, Mathew G, Ludemann R, Wayman J, Myers JC, Devitt PG. Postoperative mortality following oesophagectomy and problem in reporting its rate. Br J Surg. 2004;91:943–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. The Colon cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group. Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomized trial. Lancet Oncol. 2005;6:477–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kim HH, Hyung WJ, Cho GS, Kim MC, Han SU, Kim W, et al. Morbidity and mortality of laparoscopic gastrectomy versus open gastrectomy for gastric cancer. An interim report—a phase III multicenter, prospective, randomized trial (KLASS Trial). Ann Surg. 2010;251:417–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Allen MS, Darling GE, Pechet TTV, Mitchell JD, Herndon JE 2nd, Landreneau RJ, et al. Morbidity and mortality of major pulmonary resections in patients with early-stage lung cancer: initial results of the randomized, prospective ACOSOG Z0030 trial. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;81:1013–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cuschieri A, Shimi S, Banting S. Endoscopic oesophagectomy through a right thoracoscopic approach. J R CollEdinb. 1992;37:7–11.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. DePaula AL, Hashiba K, Ferreira EA, de Paula RA, Grecco E. Laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy with esophagogastroplasty. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1995;5:1–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Akaishi T, Kaneda I, Higuchi N, Kuriya Y, Kuramoto J, Toyoda T, Wakabayashi A. Thoracoscopic en bloc esophagectomy with radical mediastinal lymphadenectomy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1996;112:1533–40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Watson DI, Davies N, Jamieson GG. Totally endoscopic Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. Surg Endosc. 1999;13:293–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Nguyen NT, Schauer PR, Luketich JD. Combined laparoscopic and thoracoscopic approach to esophagectomy. J Am Coll Surg. 1999;188:328–32.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kernstein KH, DeArmond DT, Karimi M, Van Natta TL, Campos JC, Yoder MR, et al. The robotic, 2-stage, 3-field esophagolymphadenectomy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004;127:1847–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ruurda JP, van Vroonhoven TJ, Broeders IA. Robot-assisted surgical systems: a new era in laparoscopic surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2002;84:223–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Boone J, Schipper MEI, Moojen WA, BorelRinkes IHM, Cromheecke GJE, van Hillegersberg R. Robot-assisted thoracoscopic oesophagectomy for cancer. Br J Surg. 2009;96:878–86.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kim DJ, Hyung WJ, Lee CY, Lee JG, Haam SJ, Park IK, Chung KY. Thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: feasibility and safety of robotic assistance in the prone position. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;139:53–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Cuschieri A. Thoracoscopic subtotal esophagectomy. Endosc Surg Allied Technol. 1994;2:21–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Palanivelu C, Prakash A, Senthilkumar R, Senthilnathan P, Parthasarahi R, Rajan PS, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: thoracoscopic mobilization of the esophagus and mediastinal lymphadenectomy in prone position—experience of 130 patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2006;203:7–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Fabian T, Martin J, Katigbak M, McKelvey AA, Federico JA. Thoracoscopic esophageal mobilization during minimally invasive esophagectomy: a head-to head comparison of prone versus decubitus positions. Surg Endosc. 2008;22:2485–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Noshiro H, Iwasaki H, Kobayashi K, Uchiyama A, Miyasaka Y, Masatsugu T, et al. Lymphadenectomy along the left recurrent laryngeal nerve by a minimally invasive esophagectomy in the prone position for thoracic esophageal cancer. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:2965–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Osugi H, Takemura M, Higashino M, Takada N, Lee S, Ueno M, Tanaka Y, Fukuhara K, Hashimoto Y, Fujiwara Y, Kinoshita H. Video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy and radical lymph node dissection for esophageal cancer. A series of 75 cases. Surg Endosc. 2002;16:1588–93.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kawano T, Iwai T. Hand-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy using a new supportive approach. Surg Endosc. 2001;15:330.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Nguyen NT, Follette DM, Wolfe BM, Schneider PD, Roberts P, Goodnight JE Jr. Comparison of minimally invasive esophagectomy with transthoracic and transhiatal esophagectomy. Arch Surg. 2000;135:920–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Osugi H, Takemura M, Higashino M, Takada N, Lee S, Kinoshita H. A comparison of video-assisted thoracoscopic oesophagectomy and radical lymph node dissection for squamous cell cancer of the oesophagus with open operation. Br J Surg. 2003;90:108–13.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Smithers BM, Gotley DC, Martin I, Thomas JM. Comparison of the outcomes between open and minimally invasive esophagectomy. Ann Surg. 2007;245:232–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Fabian T, Martin JT, McKelvey AA, Federico JA. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: a teaching hospital’s first year experience. Dis Esophagus. 2008;21:220–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Zingg U, McQuinn A, DiValentino D, Esterman AJ, Bessell JR, Thompson SK, et al. Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for patients with esophageal cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;87:911–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Parameswaren R, Veeramootoo D, Krishnadas R, Cooper M, Berrisford R, Wajed S. Comparative experience of open and minimally invasive esophagogastric resection. World J Surg. 2009;33:1868–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Pham TH, Perry KA, Dolan JP, Schipper P, Sukumar M, Sheppard BC, et al. Comparison of perioperative outcomes after combined thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy and open Ivor-Lewinesophagectomy. Am J Surg. 2010;199:594–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Schoppmann SF, Prager G, Langer FB, Riegker FM, Kabon B, Fleischmann E, et al. Open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy: a single-center case controlled study. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:3044–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Gao Y, Wang Y, Chen L, Zhao Y. Comparison of open three-field and minimally-invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Intract Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2011;12:366–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Berger AC, Bloommenthal A, Weksler B, Evans N, Chojnacki KA, Yeo CJ, et al. Oncologic efficacy is not compromised, and may be improved with minimally invasive esophagectomy. J Am Coll Surg. 2011;212:560–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kinjo Y, Kurita N, Nakamura F, Okabe H, Tanaka E, Kataoka Y, et al. Effectiveness of combined thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy: comparison of postoperative complication and midterm oncological outcomes in patients with esophageal cancer. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:381–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Sundaram A, Geronimo JC, Willer BL, Hoshino M, Torgersen Z, Juhasz A, et al. Survival and quality of life after minimally invasive esophagectomy: a single-surgeon experience. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:168–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Lazzarino AI, Nagpal K, Bottle A, Faiz O, Moorthy K, Aylin P. Open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy. Trends of utilization and associated outcomes in England. Ann Surg. 2010;252:292–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Nafteux P, Moons J, Coosemans W, Decaluwe H, Decker G, De Leyn P, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: a valuable alternative to open oesophagectomy for the treatment of early oesophageal and gastro-oesophageal junction carcinoma. Eur J Cardio Thorac Surg. 2011;40:1455–65.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Ben-David K, Sarosi GA, Cendan JC, Howard D, Rossidis G, Hochwald SN. Decreasing morbidity and mortality in 100 consecutive minimally invasive esophagectomies. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:162–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Bakhos CT, Fabian T, Oyasiji TO, Gautam S, Gangadharan SP, Kent MS, et al. Impact of the surgical technique on pulmonary morbidity after esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;93:221–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Mamidanna R, Bottle A, Aylin P, Faiz O, Hanna GB. Short-term outcomes following open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer in England. Ann Surg. 2012;255:197–203.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Tsukada K, Hasegawa T, Miyazaki T, Katoh H, Yoshikawa M, Masuda N, Kuwano H. Predictive value of interleukin-8 and granulocyte elastase in pulmonary complication after esophagectomy. Am J Surg. 2001;181:167–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Fukuhara T, Kidokoro A, Fukunaga M, Nagasaki K, Suda M, Yoshikawa S. Kinetics of cytokines and PMN-E in thoracoscopic esophagectomy. Surg Endosc. 2001;15:1484–7.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Singh RK, Pham TH, Diggs BS, Perkins S, Hunter JG. Minimally invasive esophagectomy provides equivalent oncologic outcomes to open esophagectomy for locally advanced (stage II or III) esophageal carcinoma. Arch Surg. 2011;146:711–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Biere SSA, Cuesta MA, Van Del Peet DL. Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Minerva Chir. 2009;64:121–33.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Sgourakis G, Gockel I, Radtke A, Musholt TJ, Timm S, Rink A, et al. Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy: meta-analysis of outcomes. Dig Dis Sci. 2010;55:3031–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Nagpal K, Ahmed K, Vats A, Yakoub D, James D, Ashrafian H, et al. Is minimally invasive surgery beneficial in the management of esophageal cancer? A meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:1621–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Biere SS, Maas KW, Bonavina L, Garcia JR, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Rosman C, et al. Traditional invasive vs. minimally invasive esophagectomy: a multicenter, randomized trial (TIME-trial). BMC Surg. 2011;11:2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Briez N, Piessen G, Bonnetain F, Brigand C, Carrere N, Collet D, et al. Open versus laparoscopically-assisted oesophagectomy for cancer: a multicenter randomized controlled phase III trial—the MIRO trial. BMC Cancer. 2011;11:310.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Bierre SSAY, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Maas KW, Bonavina L, Rosman C, Garcia JR, et al. Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial. Lancet. 2012;379:1887–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Taguchi S, Osugi H, Higashino M, Tokuhara N, Takemura M, Lee S, et al. Comparison of three-field esophagectomy for esophageal cancer incorporating open or thoracoscopic thoracotomy. Surg Endosc. 2003;17:1445–50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hideo Baba.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Watanabe, M., Baba, Y., Nagai, Y. et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: an updated review. Surg Today 43, 237–244 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-012-0300-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-012-0300-z

Keywords

Navigation