Abstract
Purpose
Thymidylate synthase (TS) and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) are important enzymes in the metabolism of 5-fluorouracil and possible predictive markers. We conducted this study to clarify if TS and DPD gene expressions are a prognostic indicator for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHCC).
Methods
The subjects of this study were 21 patients with IHCC who had undergone surgical resection. Intratumoral TS and DPD mRNA expressions were examined using the Danenberg tumor profile method and classified into two groups according to the median value of each. We then compared the clinicopathological variables, including prognosis, between the high and low expression groups.
Results
Low DPD expression was correlated with macroscopic type, namely, mass-forming + infiltrative (P = 0.08). Postoperative survival rates in the low DPD expression group were significantly lower than those in the high DPD expression group. Multivariate analysis revealed macroscopic type to be an independent prognostic factor, whereas TS mRNA expression did not correlate with any clinicopathological variables, including prognosis.
Conclusions
Low DPD mRNA expression was related to macroscopic type and associated with poor prognosis. DPD mRNA expression in tumor cells is suggested to be an important regulator of malignant behavior in IHCC.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
The Liver Study Group of Japan. The 16th report: surveillance of primary liver cancer patients in National Registry. Kyoto: Liver Study Group of Japan (LCSGJ); 2005.
Casavila FA, Marsh JW, Iwatsuki S, Todo S, Lee RG, Madariaga R, et al. Hepatic resection and transplantation for peripheral cholangiocarcinoma. J Am Coll Surg. 1997;185:429–36.
Washburn WK, Lewis WD, Jenkins RL. Aggressive surgical resection for cholangiocarcinoma. Arch Surg. 1995;130:270–6.
Roayaie S, Guarrena JV, Ye MQ, Thung SN, Emre S, Fishbein TM, et al. Aggressive surgical treatment of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: predictors of outcomes. J Am Coll Surg. 1998;187:365–72.
Isaji S, Kawarada Y, Taoka H, Tabata M, Suzuki H, Yokoi H. Clinicopathological features and outcome of hepatic resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in Japan. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 1999;6:108–16.
Shimamura K, Kurosaki I, Sato D, Takano K, Yokoyama N, Sato Y, et al. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma arising 34 years after excision of a type IV-A congenital choledochal cyst: report of a case. Surg Today. 2009;39:247–51.
Kacznski J, Hanson G, Wallerstedt S. Incidence, etiologic aspects and clinicopathological features in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a study of 51 cases from a low endemicity area. Acta Oncol. 1988;37:77–83.
Chu KM, Lai ECS, Al-Hadeede S, Arcilla CE Jr, Lo CM, Liu CL, et al. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. World J Surg. 1997;21:301–6.
Ohtsuka M, Ito H, Kimura F, Shimizu H, Togawa A, Yoshidome H, et al. Extended hepatic resection and outcomes in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2003;10:259–64.
Yamamoto M, Takasaki K, Yoshikawa T. Extended resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in Japan. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 1999;6:117–21.
Langenbach RJ, Danenberg PV, Heidelberger C. Thymidylate synthase: mechanism of inhibition by 5-fluoro-2′-deoxyuridylate. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1972;48:1565–71.
Peters GJ, van der Wilt CL, van Triest B, Codacci-Pisanelli G, Johnston PG, van Groeningen CJ, et al. Thymidylate synthase and drug resistance. Eur J Cancer. 1995;31A:1299–305.
Heggie GD, Sommadossi JP, Cross DS, Huster WJ, Diasio RB. Clinical pharmacokinetics of 5-fluorouracil and its metabolites in plasma, urine and bile. Cancer Res. 1987;47:2203–6.
Etienne MC, Cheradame S, Fisschel JL, Formento P, Dassonville O, Rence N, et al. Response to fluorouracil therapy in cancer patients: the role of tumoral dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase activity. J Clin Oncol. 1995;13:1663–70.
Jiang W, Lu Z, He Y, Diasio RB. Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase activity in hepatocellular carcinoma: implication in 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy. Clin Cancer Res. 1997;3:395–9.
McLeod HL, Sludden J, Murray GI, Keenan RA, Davidson AI, Park K, et al. Characterization of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase in human colorectal tumor. Br J Cancer. 1998;77:461–5.
Ichikawa W, Takahashi T, Suto K, Nihei Z, Shirota Y, Shimizu M, et al. Thymidylate synthase and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase gene expression in relation to differentiation of gastric cancer. Int J Cancer. 2004;112:967–73.
Lassmann S, Hennig M, Rosenberg R, Nahrig J, Schreglmann J, Krause F, et al. Thymidine phosphorylase, dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase and thymidylate synthase mRNA expression in primary colorectal tumors: correlation to tumor histopathology and clinical follow-up. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2006;21:238–47.
Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan. Classification of primary liver cancer. 1st English edn. Tokyo: Kanehara; 1997.
Lord RV, Salonga D, Danenberg KD, Peters JH, DeMeester TR, Park JM, et al. Telomerase reverse transcriptase expression is increased early in the Barrett’s metaplasia, dysplasia, carcinoma sequence. Gastrointest Surg. 2000;4:135–42.
Heid CA, Stevens J, Livak KJ, Williams PM. Real time quantitative PCR. Genome Res. 1996;6:986–94.
Gibson UE, Geid CA, Williams PM. A novel method for real time quantitative RT-PCR. Genome Res. 1996;6:995–1011.
Fukui Y, Oka T, Nagayama S, Danenberg PV, Danenberg KD, Fukushima M. Thymidylate synthase, dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase, orotate phosphoribosyltransferase mRNA and protein expression levels in solid tumors in large scale population analysis. Int J Mol Med. 2008;22:709–16.
Yamamoto M, Takasaki K, Yoshikawa T, Ueno K, Nakano M. Does gross appearance indicate prognosis in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma? J Surg Oncol. 1998;69:162–7.
Chou FF, Sheen-Chen SM, Chen YS, Chen MC, Chen CL. Surgical treatment of cholangiocarcinoma. Hepatogastroenterology. 1997;44:760–5.
Shimada M, Yamashita Y, Aishima S, Shirabe K, Takenaka K, Sugimachi K. Hepatectomy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Br J Cancer. 2001;88:1463–6.
El Rassi ZE, Partensky C, Scoazec JY, Henry L, Lombard-Bohas C, Maddern G. Peripheral cholangiocarcinoma: presentation, diagnosis, pathology and management. Eur J Surg Oncol. 1999;25:375–80.
Valveade A, Bonhomme N, Fagas O, Sauvanet A, Flejou JF, Belghiti J. Resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a Western experience. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 1999;6:122–7.
Otsuka M, Ito H, Kimura F, Shimizu H, Togawa A, Yoshidome H, et al. Results of surgical treatment for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and clinicopathological factors influencing survival. Br J Cancer. 2002;89:1525–31.
Sasaki A, Aramaki M, Kawano K, Morii Y, Nakashima K, Yoshida T, et al. Intrahepatic peripheral cholangioma: mode of spread and choice of surgical treatment. Br J Cancer. 1998;85:1206–9.
Tuchman M, O’Dea RF, Ramnaraine LR, Mirkin BL. Pyrimidine base degradation in cultured murine C-1300 neuroblastoma cells and in situ tumors. J Clin Invest. 1988;81:425–30.
Fujiwaki R, Hata K, Nakayama K, Fukumoto M, Miyazaki K. Gene expression for dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase and thymidine phosphorylase influences outcome in epithelial ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:3946–51.
Baba H, Teramoto K, Kawamura T, Mori A, Imamura M, Arii S. Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase and thymidylate synthase activities in hepatocellular carcinomas and in diseased livers. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2003;52:469–76.
Nii A, Shimada M, Ikegami T, Harino Y, Imura S, Morine Y, et al. Significance of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase and thymidylate synthase mRNA expressions in hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatol Res. 2009;39:274–81.
Nishi M, Shimada M, Utsunomiya T, Morine Y, Imura S, Ikemoto T, et al. Role of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase and thymidylate synthase expression in immunohistochemistry of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Hepatol Res. 2011;41:64–70.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Morine, Y., Shimada, M., Utsunomiya, T. et al. Role of thymidylate synthase and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase mRNA in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Surg Today 42, 135–140 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-011-0054-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-011-0054-z