Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Using the E-PASS scoring system to estimate the risk of emergency abdominal surgery in patients with acute gastrointestinal disease

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgery Today Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The Estimation of Physiologic Ability and Surgical Stress (E-PASS) scoring system, which quantifies a patient’s reserve and surgical stress, is used to predict morbidity and mortality in patients before elective gastrointestinal surgery. We conducted this study to clarify whether the E-PASS scoring system is useful for assessing the risks of emergency abdominal surgery.

Methods

The subjects of this retrospective study were 51 patients who underwent emergency gastrointestinal surgery at a public general hospital. The main outcomes were the E-PASS scores and the postoperative course, defined by mortality and morbidity.

Results

Postoperative complications developed in 15 of the 51 patients (29.4%). The E-PASS score was significantly higher in the patients with postoperative complications than in those without (0.61 ± 0.31 vs 0.20 ± 0.35, respectively; n = 36). The morbidity rates were significantly lower in the patients with a value less than 0.5 than in those with a value more than 0.5 (17.1% and 56.3%, respectively; P < 0.01). There were 7 operative deaths among the 16 patients with a high score, versus none among the 9 patients with a low score (P < 0.01). Three patients underwent laparoscopic-assisted bowel resection with a good postoperative course, with scores of less than 0.5.

Conclusions

The E-PASS scoring system is useful for surgical decision making and evaluating whether patients will tolerate emergency gastrointestinal surgery. Minimally invasive therapy would assist in lowering the risk of complications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Copeland GP, Jones D, Walters M. POSSUM: A scoring system for surgical audit. Br J Surg 1991;78:356–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Haga Y, Wada Y, Takeuchi H, Kimura O, Furuya T, Sameshima H, et al. Estimation of physiologic ability and surgical stress (E-PASS) for a surgical audit in elective digestive surgery. Surgery 2004;135: 586–594.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hashimoto D, Takamori H, Sakamoto Y, Tanaka H, Hirota M, Baba H. Can the physiologic ability and surgical stress (E-PASS) scoring system predict operative morbidity after distal pancreatectomy? Surg Today 2010;40:632–637.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Common Toxicity Criteria, Version 2.0. April 30, 1999.

  5. Haga Y, Ikei S, Ogawa M. Estimation of Physiologic Ability and Surgical Stress (E-PASS) as a new prediction scoring system for postoperative morbidity and mortality following elective gastrointestinal surgery. Surg Today 1999;29:219–225.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Pappachan JV, Millar B, Bennett ED, Smith GB. Comparison of outcome from intensive care admission after adjustment for case mix by the APACHE II prognostic system. Chest 1999;115: 802–810.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Midwinter MJ, Tytherleigh M, Ashley S. Estimation of mortality and morbidity risk in vascular surgery using POSSUM and the Portsmouth predictor equation. Br J Surg 1999;86:471–474.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kumar P, Rodrigues GS. Comparison of POSSUM and P-POSSUM for risk-adjusted audit of patients undergoing emergency laparotomy. Ulus Trauma Acil Cerrahi Derg 2009;15:19–22.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gój K, Knapik P, Kucewicz-Czech E, Luboń D. The Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System (TISS-28) for assessment of cardiac surgical postoperative intensive care. Anestezjol Intens Ter 2009; 41:34–37.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dossett LA, Redhage LA, Sawyer RG, May AK. Revisiting the validity of APACHE II in the trauma ICU: improved risk stratification in critically injured adults. Injury 2009;40:993–998.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Pappachan JV, Millar B, Bennett ED, Smith GB. Comparison of outcome from intensive care admission after adjustment for case mix by the APACHE II prognostic system. Chest 1999;115: 802–810.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Midwinter MJ, Tytherleigh M, Ashley S. Estimation of mortality and morbidity risk in vascular surgery using POSSUM and the Portsmouth predictor equation. Br J Surg 1999;86:471–474.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kanus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE. Apache II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med 1985;13:818–829.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Haga Y, Yagi Y, Ogawa M. Less-invasive surgery for gastric cancer prolongs survival in patients over 80 years of age. Surg Today 1999;29:842–848.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This paper was presented at the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Surgery in Tokyo, Japan, on July 19, 2007.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Koushi, K., Korenaga, D., Kawanaka, H. et al. Using the E-PASS scoring system to estimate the risk of emergency abdominal surgery in patients with acute gastrointestinal disease. Surg Today 41, 1481–1485 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-010-4538-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-010-4538-z

Key words

Navigation