Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Mechanical intestinal cleansing and antibiotic prophylaxis for preventing bacterial translocation during the pringle maneuver in rabbits

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgery Today Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

We investigated the effectiveness of mechanical intestinal cleansing and antibiotic prophylaxis in preventing bacterial translocation (BT) during the Pringle maneuver in rabbits.

Methods

Forty-eight rabbits were allocated to one of the following four groups: a control group (group 1); an antibiotic group, given 100 mg/kg intravenous ceftizoxime (group 2); a mechanical intestinal cleansing group, given a Fleet enema (group 3); and a mechanical intestinal cleansing plus antibiotic group (group 4). After performing laparotomy, we dissected the portal region and turned the portal triad, using tape. Pringle maneuver was applied for 30 min in all groups. Blood samples were collected from the portal vein for blood culture before the Pringle maneuver. All groups underwent relaparotomy 30 min after the Pringle maneuver, to obtain portal blood, mesenteric lymph nodes (MLNs), and splenic tissue for culture.

Results

All cultures from the portal vein specimens taken before the Pringle maneuver were negative. The rate of bacterial isolation in the portal vein (P < 0.001), MLNs (P < 0.01), and splenic (P < 0.001) cultures was significantly lower in group 4 than in the other groups. It was also lower in group 3 than in groups 1 and 2 (P < 0.05 for all).

Conclusions

The combination of mechanical intestinal cleansing and preoperative broad-spectrum antibiotics was most effective for preventing BT during the Pringle maneuver.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mainous MR, Tso P, Berg RD, Deitch EA. Studies of the route, magnitude and time course of bacterial translocation in a model of systemic inflammation. Arch Surg 1991;126(1):33–37.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Sorell WT, Quigley EM, Jin G, Johnson TJ, Rikkers LF. Bacterial translocation in the portal-hypertensive rat: studies in basal conditions and on exposure to hemorrhagic shock. Gastroenterology 1993;104(6):1722–1726.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Edmiston CE, Condon RE. Bacterial translocation. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1991;173(1):73–83.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Alexander JW, Boyce ST, Babcock GF, Peck MD, Dunn DL, Pyles T, et al. The process of microbial translocation. Ann Surg 1990;212(4):496–512.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Shou J, Lappin J, Minnard EA, Daly JM. Total parenteral nutrition, bacterial translocation, and host immune function. Am J Surg 1994;167(1):145–150.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ferri M, Gabriel S, Gavelli A, Franconeri P, Huguet C. Bacterial translocation during portal clamping for liver resection. A clinical study. Arch Surg 1997;132(2):162–165.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ancel D, Barraud H, Peyrin-Biroulet L, Bronowicki JP. Intestinal permeability and cirrhosis. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 2006;30(3):460–468.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Berber I, Aydin C, Cevahir N, Yenisey C, Gumrukcu G, Kocbil G, et al. Tempol reduces bacterial translocation after ischemia/reperfusion injury in a rat model of superior mesenteric artery occlusion. Surg Today 2009;39(5):407–413.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Güler O, Akturan S, Kisli E, Dolapçi I, Çaydere M, Akova A. Acute pancreatitis, bacterial translocation, and different octreotide regimens: an experimental study. Surg Today 2009;39(10):876–883.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wiest R, Garcia-Tsao G. Bacterial translocation (BT) in cirrhosis. Hepatology 2005;41(3):422–433.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Deitch EA, Winterton J, Li M, Berg R. The gut as a portal of entry for bacteremia: the role of protein malnutrition. Ann Surg 1987;205(6):681–692.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kaya E, Yılmazlar T, Özen Y. The evaluation of bacterial translocation in acetic acid-induced experimental colitis in rats (in Turkish). Ulusal Cerrahi Dergisi (Turk J Surg) 1995;11:378–386.

    Google Scholar 

  13. MacFie J. Current status of bacterial translocation as a cause of surgical sepsis. Br Med Bull 2004;71:1–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Çetin R, Kocaoğlu H, Karaoğuz M. The effect of vasculary occlusion period on liver function tests in hepatic resections (in Turkish). Ulusal Cerrahi Dergisi (Turk J Surg) 1996;12:151–156.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Şahin M, Kartal A, Tekin A, Pekin C. Our experiences in RF-assisted resection in liver tumors and hydatid cycts. Ulusal Cerrahi Dergisi 2005;21(1):37–40.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Belghiti J, Noun R, Zante E, Ballet T, Sauvanet A. Portal triad clamping or hepatic vascular exclusion for major liver resection. A controlled study. Ann Surg 1996;224(2):155–161.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Fortner JG, Shiu MH, Kinne DW, Kim DK, Castro EB, Watson RC, et al. Major hepatic resection using vascular isolation and hypothermic perfusion. Ann Surg 1974;180(4):644–652.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Pichlmayr R, Grosse H, Hauss J, Gubernatis G, Lamesch P, Bretschneider HJ. Technique and preliminary results of extracorporeal liver surgery (bench procedure) and of surgery on the in situ perfused liver. Br J Surg 1990;77(1):21–26.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Delva E, Camus Y, Paugam C, Parc R, Huguet C, Lienhart A. Hemodynamic effects of portal triad clamping in humans. Anesth Analg 1987;66:864–868.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Furuchi K, Usami M, Ohyanagi H, Saitoh Y. Inhibitory effect of portal pooling, bacterial translocation, and Kupffer cell activation on hepatic regeneration after partial hepatectomy by repeated portal triad cross clamping in rats. Nippon Shokakibyo Gakkai Zasshi 1993;90(12):3006–3017.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Van Minnen LP, Nieuwenhuijs VB, de Bruijn MT, Verheem A, Visser MR, van Dijk JE, et al. Effects of subtotal colectomy on bacterial translocation during experimental acute pancreatitis. Pancreas 2006;32(1):110–114.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Deitch EA. Bacterial translocation of the gut flora. J Trauma 1990;30(12 suppl):S184–S189.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Brook I, Ledney GD. Ofloxacin and penicillin G combination therapy in prevention of bacterial translocation and animal mortality after irradiation. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1991;35(8):1685–1687.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Zong G, Xiao G, Zhang Y. Prophylactic effect of systemic ceftazidime on bacterial translocation in scalded rats. Zhonghua Zheng Xing Shao Shang Wai Ke Za Zhi 1994;10(6):456–458.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Büchler MW, Gloor B, Müller CA, Friess H, Seiler CA, Uhl W. Acute necrotizing pancreatitis: treatment strategy according to the status of infection. Ann Surg 2000;232(5):619–626.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Erenoglu, B., Gokturk, H.S., Kucukkartallar, T. et al. Mechanical intestinal cleansing and antibiotic prophylaxis for preventing bacterial translocation during the pringle maneuver in rabbits. Surg Today 41, 824–828 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-010-4363-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-010-4363-4

Key words

Navigation