Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Quality and safety initiatives in the future practice of surgery: Meeting patient demands for enhanced professionalism

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Surgery Today Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article is based on a speech that Thomas R. Russell, MD, FACS, Executive Director of the American College of Surgeons, delivered to the Japan Surgical Society in May 2008, which centered on quality of care and patient safety issues and their relationship to professionalism. The article provides a brief overview of the American and Japanese health care systems, outlines the quality and safety issues facing our health care systems, and addresses the changes that need to occur within surgery’s professional culture in order to improve patient care. In addition, he explains what the American College of Surgeons is doing to advance quality, safety, and professionalism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. OECD health data 2007. Available at http://www.oecd.org/health/healthdata. Accessed 28 April 2008. OECD; 2007.

  2. U.S. Census Bureau, International Database. Infant mortality and life expectancy for selected countries, 2007. Available at http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0004393.html. Accessed 28 April 2008.

  3. Liang BA. Legal challenges for surgeon participation in patient safety activities: outlining the law and its risks. In: Manuel BM, Nora PF, editors. Surgical patient safety: essential information for surgeons in today’s environment. Chicago, IL: American College of Surgeons; 2004. Chapter 11.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS (editors). To err is human: building a safer health system. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Helmreich RL, Musson DM, Sexton B. Human factors and safety in surgery. In: Manuel BM, Nora PF, editors. Surgical patient safety: essential information for surgeons in today’s environment. Chicago, IL: American College of Surgeons; 2004. Chapter 1.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Rogers SO Jr, Gawande AA, Kwann M, Puopolo AL, Yoon C, Brennan TA, et al. Analysis of surgical errors in closed malpractice claims at 4 liability insurers. Surgery 2006;140(1):25–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ikegami N, Campbell JC. Health care reform in Japan: the virtues of muddling through. Health Affairs 1999;18(3):56–75.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cook RI, O’Connor M, Render M, Woods D. Operating at the sharp end: the human factors of complex technical work and its implications for patient safety. In: Manuel BM, Nora PF, editors. Surgical patient safety: essential information for surgeons in today’s environment. Chicago, IL: American College of Surgeons; 2004. Chapter 2.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Griffen FD Jr, Stephens LS, Alexander JB, Bailey HR, Maizel SE, Sutton BH, et al. The American College of Surgeons’ closed claims study: new insights for improving care. J Am Coll Surg 2007;204:561–569.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Griffen FD, Stephens, LS, Alexander JB, Bailey HR, Maizel SE, Sutton BH, et al. Violations of behavioral practices revealed in closed claims reviews. J Am Coll Surg 2008;248(3):468–474.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ikegami N, Campbell JC. Japan’s health care system: containing costs and attempting reform. Health Affairs 2004;23(3):26–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. McGlynn EA, Asch SM, Adams J, Keesey J, Hicks J, DeCristofaro A, et al. The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. N Engl J Med 2003;348:2635–2645.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. ACGME Outcome Project: General competencies. Chicago, IL: Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education; 2001. http://www.acgme.org/outcome/comp/compFull.asp. Accessed December 19, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Nahrwold DL. The competence movement: a report on the activities of the American Board of Medical Specialties. Bull Am Coll Surg 2000;85(11):14–18.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Satava RM. The role of surgical simulation in patient safety and the importance of metrics for training and assessing surgical technical performance. In: Manuel BM, Nora PF, editors. Surgical patient safety: essential information for surgeons in today’s environment. Chicago, IL: American College of Surgeons; 2004. Chapter 13.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sachdeva Ajit K, Blair PG. Enhancing patient safety through educational interventions. In: Manuel BM, Nora PF, editors. Surgical patient safety: essential information for surgeons in today’s environment. Chicago, IL: American College of Surgeons; 2004. Chapter 14.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Russell TR, Brown CA. Error detection, analysis, and reporting. In: Manuel BM, Nora PF, editors. Surgical patient safety: essential information for surgeons in today’s environment. Chicago, IL: American College of Surgeons; 2004. Chapter 8.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Harris JA. What surgeons should know about … Medicare’s physician quality reporting initiative. Bull Am Coll Surg 2007;92(6):8–11, 38.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Glendinning D. P4P demo pays off for Medicare, but not for most doctors involved. Am Med News 2007;Aug 6:1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pear R. Medicare says it won’t cover hospital errors. NY Times 2007;August 19:A1.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Nomura H, Nakayama T. The Japanese healthcare system. BMJ 2005:331:648–649.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Spencer FC. Small S. Organizing for patient safety at the institutional level. In: Manuel BM, Nora PF, editors. Surgical patient safety: essential information for surgeons in today’s environment. Chicago, IL: American College of Surgeons; 2004. Chapter 3.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hiatt H. Protecting the medical commons: who is responsible. N Engl J Med 1975;293(5):235–241.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. American College of Surgeons. Accredited education institutes. http://www.facs.org/education/accreditationprogram/index.html. Accessed December 20, 2007.

  25. Nora PF. Personal communication. December 20, 2007.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Japan Surgical Society State of the Art Lecture

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Russell, T.R. Quality and safety initiatives in the future practice of surgery: Meeting patient demands for enhanced professionalism. Surg Today 39, 739–745 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-008-4014-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-008-4014-1

Key words

Navigation