Abstract
Purpose
To evaluate the usefulness of double contrast small-bowel radiography (SBR) in the preoperative assessment of patients with Crohn’s disease (CD).
Methods
Thirty-nine consecutive patients who underwent surgery for CD between 2000 and 2004, preceded by a preoperative small-bowel series evaluation, were enrolled in our study. The radiologic findings were compared with the intraoperative findings.
Results
Small-bowel radiography was associated with good specificity and sensitivity for the detection of stenosis. Although its main limitation was a remarkable overestimation of stenosis, the main indications for surgery were always confirmed. Sensitivity and specificity were lower for the detection of internal fistulas and the correlation was significant only for SBR performed within 3 months of the operation; however, the concordance between radiological and operative findings was greater. No correlation was observed for the detection of an abdominal mass.
Conclusions
Small-bowel radiography is still reliable for evaluating stenoses and internal fistulas. However, magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography is mandatory to evaluate an abdominal mass.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Maconi G, Sampietro GM, Parente F, Pompili G, Russo A, Cristaldi M, et al. Contrast radiology, computer tomography and ultrasonography in detecting internal fistulas and intra-abdominal abscess in Crohn’s Disease: a prospective comparative study. Am J Gastroenterol 2003;98:1545–1555.
Ruffolo C, Angriman I, Scarpa M, Polese L, Pagano D, Barollo M, et al. Urologic complications in Crohn’s disease: suspicion criteria. Hepatogastroenterology 2006;53:357–360.
Wiarda BM, Kuipers EJ, Heitbrink MA, van Oijen A, Stoker J. MR Enteroclysis of inflammatory small-bowel diseases. Am J Roentgenol 2006;187:522–531.
Gourtsoyiannis NC, Grammatikakis J, Papamastorakis G, Koutroumbakis J, Prassopoulos P, Rousomoustakaki M, et al. Imaging of small intestinal Crohn’s disease: comparing between MR small bowel radiography and conventional small bowel radiography. Eur Radiol 2006;16:1915–1925.
Hara AK, Leighton JA, Heigh RI, Sharma VK, Silva AC, De Petris G, et al. Crohn disease of the small bowel: preliminary comparison among CT enterography, capsule endoscopy, smallbowel follow-through, and ileoscopy. Radiology 2006;238:128–134.
Masselli G, Casciani E, Polettini E, Lanciotti S, Bertini L, Gualdi G. Assessment of Crohn’s disease in the small bowel: prospective comparison of magnetic resonance small bowel radiography with conventional small bowel radiography. Eur Radiol 2006;16:2817–2827.
Michelassi F, Stella M, Balestracci T, Giuliante F, Marogna P, Block GE. Incidence, diagnosing and treatment of enteric and colorectal fistulae in patients with Crohn’s disease. Ann Surg 1993;218:660–666.
Baker ME, Einstein DM. Radiographic evaluation. In: Michelassi F, Milsom JW, editors. Inflammatory bowel disease-surgery. Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer; 1999. p. 109–137.
Malchow H, Ewe K, Brandes JW, Goebell H, Ehms H, Sommer H, et al. European cooperative Crohn’s disease study (ECCDS): results of drug treatment. Gastroenterology 1984;86:249–266.
Lennard-Jones JE. Classification of inflammatory bowel disease. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl 1989;170:2–6; discussion 16–9.
Best WR, Becktel JM, Singleton JW. Rederived values of the eight coefficients of the Crohn’s Disease Activity Index (CDAI). Gastroenterology 1979;77:843–846.
Nolan DJ. The true yield of the small intestinal barium study. Endoscopy 1997;29:447–453.
Parsi MA, Lashner BA, Achkar JP, Connor JT, Brezezinski A. Type of fistula determines response to infliximab in patients with fistulous Crohn’s disease. Am J Gastroenterol 2004;445–449.
Tarjan Z, Toth G, Gyorke T, Mester A, Karlinger K, Mako EK. Ultrasound in Crohn’s disease of the small bowel. Eur J Radiol 2000;35:176–182.
Parente F, Greco S, Molteni M, Anderloni A, Sampietro GM, Danelli PG, et al. Oral contrast enhanced bowel ultrasonography in the assessment of small intestine Crohn’s disease. A prospective comparison with conventional ultrasound, X-ray studies, and ileocolonoscopy. Gut 2004;53:1652–1657.
Calabrese E, La Seta F, Buccellato A, Virdone R, Pallotta N, Corazziari E, et al. Crohn’s disease: a comparative prospective study of transabdominal ultrasonography, small intestine contrast ultrasonography, and small bowel enema. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2005;11:139–145.
Triester SL, Leighton JA, Leontiadis GI, Gurudu SR, Fleischer DE, Hara AK, et al. A meta-analysis of the yield of capsule endoscopy compared to other diagnostic modalities in patients with non-stricturing small bowel Crohn’s disease. Am J Gastroenterol 2006;101(5):954–964.
Magdeburg R, Riester T, Hummel F, Löhr M, Post S, Sturm J. Ileus secondary to wireless capsule enteroscopy. Int J Colorectal Dis 2006;21(6):610–613.
Parente F, Maconi G, Bollani S, Anderloni A, Sampietro G, Cristaldi M, et al. Bowel ultrasound in assessment of Crohn’s disease and detection of related small bowel strictures: a prospective comparative study versus x ray and intraoperative findings. Gut 2002;50:490–495.
Cirillo LC, Camera L, Della Noce M, Castiglione F, Mazzacca G, Salvatore M. Accuracy of enteroclysis in Crohn’s disease of the small bowel: a retrospective study. Eur Radiol 2000;10:1894–1898.
Bernstein CN, Boult IF, Greenberg HM, van der Putten W, Duffy G, Grahame GR. A prospective randomized comparison between small bowel small bowel radiography and small bowel follow-through in Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology 1997;113:390–398.
Maglinte DD, Chernish SM, Kelvin FM, O’Connor KW, Hage JP. Crohn’s disease of the small intestine: accuracy and relevance of small bowel radiography. Radiology 1992;184:541–545.
Ruffolo C, Angriman I, Scarpa M, Polese L, Barollo M, Bertin M, et al. Minimally invasive management of Crohn’s disease complicated by ureteral stenosis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Technol 2004;14:292–294.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Angriman, I., Scarpa, M., Ruffolo, C. et al. Double contrast small-bowel radiography in the preoperative assessment of Crohn’s disease: Is it still useful?. Surg Today 38, 700–704 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-007-3700-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-007-3700-8