Skip to main content

Anterior Resection of Rectal Cancer Without Bowel Preparation and Diverting Stoma

Abstract

Purpose

Since the introduction of total mesorectal excision (TME) as the standard operation technique for rectal cancer, anastomotic leakage percentages of up to 18% have been reported. To prevent such leakage, the use of mechanical bowel preparation and also the construction of a diverting ileostoma or colostomy have been standard procedures for years. In our institute, however, all patients undergoing colorectal surgery are operated upon without these measures. The present study was undertaken to investigate the results of this strategy in terms of the occurrence of postoperative anastomotic leakage.

Methods

All patients who underwent an elective (low) anterior resection between January 1996 and December 2001 (n = 144) entered the study. The clinical and pathological records of these patients were reviewed retrospectively. The exclusion criteria were patients with fixed rectal carcinoma who received preoperative radiotherapy and/or a stoma only at operation, emergency operations, abdominoperoneal resections, and Hartmann’s procedures.

Results

Anastomotic leakage occurred in 7 out of 144 patients (4.9%). There was a trend toward a higher leakage frequency in men, in patients with a distal anastomosis, in patients with a stapled anastomosis, and in patients with a T3–T4 tumor or with positive lymph nodes. None of these factors, however, had a significant prognostic value based on a univariate or multivariate analysis. Those who died after leakage tended to be older than those who did not (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

A (low) anterior resection can be performed safely without mechanical bowel preparation or a diverting stoma, and results in an anastomotic leakage percentage of less than 5%. Appropriate selection of patients may be important, but none of the investigated patient- or tumor-related factors could be identified as decisive.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. RJ Heald BJ Moran RDH Ryall R Sexton JK MacFarlane (1998) ArticleTitleRectal cancer the Basingstoke experience of total mesorectal excision, 1978–1997 Arch Surg 133 894–9 Occurrence Handle10.1001/archsurg.133.8.894 Occurrence Handle9711965

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. E Rullier C Laurent JL Garrelon P Michel J Saric M Parneix (1998) ArticleTitleRisk factors for anastomotic leakage after resection of rectal cancer Br J Surg 85 355–8 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00615.x Occurrence Handle9529492

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. A Nesbakken K Nygaard OC Lunde (2001) ArticleTitleOutcome and late functional results after anastomotic leakage following mesorectal excision for rectal cancer Br J Surg 88 400–4 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2168.2001.01719.x Occurrence Handle11260107

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. D Van Geldere P Fa-Si-Oen LA Noach PJ Rietra JL Peterse RP Boom (2002) ArticleTitleComplications after colorectal surgery without mechanical bowel preparation J Am Coll Surg 194 40–7 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S1072-7515(01)01131-0 Occurrence Handle11803955

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. P Burke K Mealy P Gillen W Joyce O Traynor J Hyland (1994) ArticleTitleRequirement for bowel preparation in colorectal surgery Br J Surg 81 907–10 Occurrence Handle8044619

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. L Oliveira SD Wexner N Daniel D DeMarta EG Weiss JJ Nogueras et al. (1997) ArticleTitleMechanical bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery: a prospective, randomized, surgeon-blinded trial comparing sodium phosphate and polyethylene glycol-based oral lavage solutions Dis Colon Rectum 40 585–91 Occurrence Handle9152189

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. O Zmora A Mahajna B Bar-Zakai D Rosin D Hershko M Shabtai et al. (2003) ArticleTitleColon and rectal surgery without mechanical bowel preparation: a randomized prospective trial Ann Surg 237 263–7

    Google Scholar 

  8. P Brownson SA Jenkins D Nott S Ellenbogen (1992) ArticleTitleMechanical bowel preparation before colorectal surgery: results of a prospective randomized trial Br J Surg 79 461–2

    Google Scholar 

  9. JC Santos SuffixJr J Batista MT Sirimarco AS Guimaraes CE Levy (1994) ArticleTitleProspective randomized trial of mechanical bowel preparation in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery Br J Surg 81 1673–6 Occurrence Handle7827905

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. MA Memon J Devine J Freeney SG From (1997) ArticleTitleIs mechanical bowel preparation really necessary for elective left sided colon and rectal surgery? Int J Colorectal Dis 12 298–302 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s003840050110 Occurrence Handle9401846

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. RP Miettinen ST Laitinen JT Makela ME Paakkonen (2000) ArticleTitleBowel preparation with oral polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution vs. no preparation in elective open colorectal surgery: prospective, randomized study Dis Colon Rectum 43 669–77 Occurrence Handle10826429

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Guenaga KF, Matos D, Castro AA, Atallah AN, Wille-Jorgensen P. Mechanical bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003;CD001544

  13. JK MacFarlane RDH Ryall RJ Heald (1993) ArticleTitleMesorectal excision for rectal cancer Lancet 341 457–60 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0140-6736(93)90207-W Occurrence Handle8094488

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. ND Karanjia AP Corder P Bearn RJ Heald (1994) ArticleTitleLeakage from stapled low anastomosis after total mesorectal excision for carcinoma of the rectum Br J Surg 81 1224–6 Occurrence Handle7953369

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. E Carlsen E Schlichting I Guldvog E Johnson RJ Heald (1998) ArticleTitleEffect of the introduction of total mesorectal excision for the treatment of rectal cancer Br J Surg 85 526–9 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00601.x Occurrence Handle9607540

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. A Vignali L Gianotti M Braga G Radaelli L Malvezzi V Di Carlo (2000) ArticleTitleAltered microperfusion at the rectal stump is predictive for rectal anastomotic leak Dis Colon Rectum 43 76–82 Occurrence Handle10813128

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. R Golub RW Golub R Cantu SuffixJr HD Stein (1997) ArticleTitleA multivariate analysis of factors contributing to leakage of intestinal anastomoses J Am Coll Surg 184 364–72 Occurrence Handle9100681

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. A Vignali FW Fazio IC Lavery JW Milsom JM Church TL Hull et al. (1997) ArticleTitleFactors associated with the occurrence of leaks in stapled rectal anastomoses: a review of 1 014 patients J Am Coll Surg 185 105–13 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S1072-7515(97)00018-5 Occurrence Handle9249076

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. LT Sørensen T Jørgensen LT Kirkeby J Skovdal B Vennits P Wille-Jørgensen (1999) ArticleTitleSmoking and alcohol abuse are major risk factors for anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery Br J Surg 86 927–31 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2168.1999.01165.x Occurrence Handle10417567

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. LW Law KW Chu JWC Ho CW Chan (2000) ArticleTitleRisk factors for anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision Am J Surg 179 92–6 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0002-9610(00)00252-X Occurrence Handle10773140

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. B Leester I Asztalos C Polnyib (2002) ArticleTitleSeptic complications after low anterior rectal resection: is diverting stoma still justified? Acta Chir Iugosl 49 67–71

    Google Scholar 

  22. M Machado O Hallbook S Goldman PO Nystrom J Jarhult R Sjodahl (2002) ArticleTitleDefunctioning stoma in low anterior resection with colonic pouch for rectal cancer: a comparison between two hospitals with a different policy Dis Colon Rectum 45 940–5 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10350-004-6333-7 Occurrence Handle12130884

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. O Schmidt S Merkel W Hohenberger (2003) ArticleTitleAnastomotic leakage after low rectal stapler anastomosis: significance of intra operative anastomotic testing Eur J Surg Oncol 29 239–43 Occurrence Handle10.1053/ejso.2002.1416 Occurrence Handle12657233

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. ND Karanjia AP Corder PJ Holdsworth RJ Heald (1991) ArticleTitleRisk of peritonitis and fatal septicaemia and the need to defunction the low anastomosis Br J Surg 78 196–8 Occurrence Handle2015471

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. CAM Marijnen E Kapiteijn CJH Van de Velde H Martijn WH Steup T Wiggers et al. (2002) ArticleTitleAcute side effects and complications after short-term preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision in primary rectal cancer: report of a multicenter randomized trial J Clin Oncol 20 817–25 Occurrence Handle10.1200/JCO.20.3.817 Occurrence Handle11821466

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. F Marusch A Koch U Schmidt S Geibetaler H Dralle HD Saeger et al. (2002) ArticleTitleValue of a protective stoma in low anterior resections for rectal cancer Dis Colon Rectum 45 1164–71 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10350-004-6384-9 Occurrence Handle12352230

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. AW Gooszen RH Geelkerken J Hermans MB Lagaay HG Gooszen (1998) ArticleTitleTemporary decompression after colorectal surgery: randomized comparison of loop ileostomy and loop colostomy Br J Surg 85 76–9 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00526.x Occurrence Handle9462389

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. M Kairaluoma H Rissanen V Kultti JP Mecklin I Kellokumpu (2002) ArticleTitleOutcome of temporary stomas: a prospective study of temporary intestinal stomas constructed between 1989 and 1996 Dig Surg 19 45–51 Occurrence Handle10.1159/000052005 Occurrence Handle11961355

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. K Mealy E O’Broin J Donohue A Tanner FB Keane (1996) ArticleTitleReversible colostomy: what is the outcome? Dis Colon Rectum 39 1227–31 Occurrence Handle8918429

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. CA Peller O Froymovich PI Tartter (1989) ArticleTitleThe true cost of protective loop colostomy Am J Gastroenterol 84 1034–7 Occurrence Handle2773896

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. T Koperna (2003) ArticleTitleCost-effectiveness of defunctioning stomas in low anterior resections for rectal cancer: a call for benchmarking Arch Surg 138 1334–8 Occurrence Handle10.1001/archsurg.138.12.1334 Occurrence Handle14662534

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vlot, E., Zeebregts, C., Gerritsen, J. et al. Anterior Resection of Rectal Cancer Without Bowel Preparation and Diverting Stoma. Surg Today 35, 629–633 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-005-2999-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-005-2999-2

Key words

  • Total mesorectal excision (TME)
  • Mechanical bowel preparation
  • Diverting stoma
  • Anastomotic leakage