Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Should PRECISE-DAPT be included for long-term prognostic stratification of diabetic patients with NSTEACS?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Acta Diabetologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aims

There are insufficient data regarding risk scores validation in patients with diabetes mellitus and non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTEACS). We performed a diabetes mellitus-specific analysis of cardiovascular outcomes after NSTEACS. We tested the predictive power of the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) and PREdicting bleeding Complications In patients undergoing Stent implantation and subsEquent Dual Anti-Platelet Therapy (PRECISE-DAPT) scores.

Methods

This work is a retrospective analysis that included 7,415 consecutive NSTEACS patients from two Spanish Universitarian hospitals between the years 2003 and 2017. The area under the ROC curve among with and without diabetes mellitus patients was calculated, to evaluate the predictive power of both scores. 

Results

Among the study participants, 2124 patients (28.0%) were diabetic. The median follow-up was 54,3 months (IQR 24,7–80,0 months). Diabetic patients were more women (30.5% vs. 25.7%) and older (70.0 ± 10.8 vs. 65.3 ± 13.2 years old); they had higher GRACE (146 ± 36 vs. 137 ± 36), PRECISE-DAPT (15 ± 7 vs. 18 ± 9) at admission. Early invasive coronary angiography (≤ 24 h after admission) was performed more frequently in non-diabetic. We tested the predictive power of the GRACE and PRECISE-DAPT risk scores among diabetic and non-diabetic. PRECISE-DAPT risk score showed a good predictive power for all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality and MACE in diabetic admitted with NSTEACS, without differences compared to non-diabetic.

Conclusions

PRECISE-DAPT risk score has an appropriate predictive power in diabetic patients admitted with NSTEACS compared to non-diabetic NSTEACS. However, GRACE would be predictive worse in diabetic during long-term follow-up in a large contemporary registry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

NSTEACS:

Non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome

ACS:

Acute coronary syndrome

DM:

Diabetes mellitus

ESC:

European Society of Cardiology

GRACE:

Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events

PRECISE-DAPT:

PREdicting bleeding Complications In patients undergoing Stent implantation and subsEquent Dual Anti-Platelet Therapy

MACE:

Major adverse cardiac events

HF:

Heart Failure

AUC:

Area under the ROC curve

NRI:

Net Reclassification Improvement

IDI:

Integrated Discrimination Improvement

References

  1. Hedayati T, Yadav N, Khanagavi J (2018) Non-ST-Segment Acute Coronary Syndromes. Cardiol Clin 36(1):37–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccl.2017.08.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Puymirat E, Simon T, Cayla G, Cottin Y, Elbaz M, Coste P et al (2017) Acute myocardial infarction: changes in patient characteristics, management, and 6-month outcomes over a period of 20 years in the FAST-MI program (french registry of acute ST-elevation or non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction) 1995 to 2015. Circulation 136(20):1908–1919. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.030798

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Alabas OA, Hall M, Dondo TB, Rutherford MJ, Timmis AD, Batin PD et al (2017) Long-term excess mortality associated with diabetes following acute myocardial infarction: a population-based cohort study. J Epidemiol Commun Health 71(1):25–32. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2016-207402

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Nauta ST, Deckers JW, Akkerhuis KM, van Domburg RT (2012) Short- and long-term mortality after myocardial infarction in patients with and without diabetes: changes from 1985 to 2008. Diabetes Care 35(10):2043–2047. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc11-2462

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Shehab A, Bhagavathula AS, Al-Rasadi K, Alshamsi F, Al Kaab J, Thani KB et al (2020) Diabetes and mortality in acute coronary syndrome: findings from the gulf COAST registry. Curr Vasc Pharmacol 18(1):68–76. https://doi.org/10.2174/1570161116666181024094337

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Amsterdam EA, Wenger NK, Brindis RG, Casey DE Jr, Ganiats TG, Holmes DR Jr et al (2014) 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation 130(25):2354–2394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2014.09.017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Collet JP, Thiele H, Barbato E, Barthélémy O, Bauersachs J, Bhatt DL et al (2021) 2020 ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J 42(14):1289–1367. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa575

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Granger CB, Goldberg RJ, Dabbous O, Pieper KS, Eagle KA, Cannon CP et al (2003) Predictors of hospital mortality in the global registry of acute coronary events. Arch Intern Med 163(19):2345–2353. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.163.19.2345

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Baeza-Román A, de Miguel-Balsa E, Latour-Pérez J, Carrillo-López A (2017) Predictive power of the grace score in population with diabetes. Int J Cardiol 248:73–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.06.083

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Costa F, van Klaveren D, James S, Heg D, Räber L, Feres F et al (2017) Derivation and validation of the predicting bleeding complications in patients undergoing stent implantation and subsequent dual antiplatelet therapy (PRECISE-DAPT) score: a pooled analysis of individual-patient datasets from clinical trials. Lancet 389(10073):1025–1034. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30397-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ando T, Nakazato K, Kimishima Y, Kiko T, Shimizu T, Misaka T et al (2020) The clinical value of the PRECISE-DAPT score in predicting long-term prognosis in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc 29:100552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcha.2020.100552

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, Chaitman BR, Bax JJ, Morrow DA et al (2018) Fourth universal definition of myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 72(18):2231–2264. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000617

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Elbarouni B, Goodman SG, Yan RT, Welsh RC, Kornder JM, Deyoung JP et al (2009) Validation of the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Event (GRACE) risk score for in-hospital mortality in patients with acute coronary syndrome in Canada. Am Heart J 158(3):392–399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2009.06.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Abu-Assi E, Ferreira-González I, Ribera A, Marsal JR, Cascant P, Heras M et al (2010) Do GRACE (Global Registry of Acute Coronary events) risk scores still maintain their performance for predicting mortality in the era of contemporary management of acute coronary syndromes? Am Heart J 160(5):826–834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2010.06.053

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Fox KA, Fitzgerald G, Puymirat E, Huang W, Carruthers K, Simon T et al (2014) Should patients with acute coronary disease be stratified for management according to their risk? Derivation, external validation and outcomes using the updated GRACE risk score. BMJ Open. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004425

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Chen CW, Hsieh YC, Hsieh MH, Lin YK, Huang CY, Yeh JS (2020) Predictive power of in-hospital and long-term mortality of the GRACE, TIMI, revised CADILLAC and PAMI score in NSTEMI patients with diabetes - data from TSOC ACS-DM registry. Acta Cardiol Sin 36(6):595–602. https://doi.org/10.6515/ACS.202011_36(6).20200326A

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Subherwal S, Bach RG, Chen AY, Gage BF, Rao SV, Newby LK et al (2009) Baseline risk of major bleeding in non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: the CRUSADE (Can Rapid risk stratification of Unstable angina patients suppress ADverse outcomes with Early implementation of the ACC/AHA Guidelines) bleeding score. Circulation 119(14):1873–1882. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.828541

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Antman EM, Cohen M, Bernink PJ, McCabe CH, Horacek T, Papuchis G et al (2000) The TIMI risk score for unstable angina/non-ST elevation MI: A method for prognostication and therapeutic decision making. JAMA 284(7):835–842. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.284.7.835

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Baluja A, Rodríguez-Mañero M, Cordero A, Kreidieh B, Iglesias-Alvarez D, García-Acuña JM et al (2020) Prediction of major adverse cardiac, cerebrovascular events in patients with diabetes after acute coronary syndrome. Diab Vasc Dis Res. https://doi.org/10.1177/1479164119892137

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Federico García‑Rodeja Arias.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

This manuscript has no conflicts of interest.

Ethical standard

The ethics committee of the coordinators at each hospital approved the study protocol.

Informed consent

Informed consent was collected from the individuals participating in the study.

Additional information

Managed by Antonio Secchi .

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

García‑Rodeja Arias, F., Álvarez Álvarez, B., González Ferrero, T. et al. Should PRECISE-DAPT be included for long-term prognostic stratification of diabetic patients with NSTEACS?. Acta Diabetol 59, 163–170 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00592-021-01792-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00592-021-01792-w

Keywords

Navigation