Skip to main content

Intravitreal ranibizumab alone or in combination with panretinal photocoagulation for the treatment of proliferative diabetic retinopathy with coexistent macular edema: long-term outcomes of a prospective study

Acta Diabetologica volume 57, pages 1219–1225 (2020)Cite this article

Abstract

Aims

To compare intravitreal ranibizumab as monotherapy or in combination with panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) and coexistent diabetic macular edema (DME) in a long-term follow-up of 24 months.

Methods

Participants in this prospective study were 47 patients with PDR and concurrent DME, who were randomized at baseline into two groups: (i) the “ranibizumab alone” group (n = 23), which was treated with at least 3 intravitreal ranibizumab injections as a loading phase, and (ii) the “combination” group (n = 24), which was treated with PRP and at least 3 intravitreal ranibizumab injections. Thereafter, all patients were followed up at a pro re nata (PRN) basis, with regular monthly monitoring for 24 months. At each visit, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and spectral domain-optical coherence tomography were performed, while regression of neovascularization was also recorded.

Results

The “combination” group had better control of neovascularization and less events of vitreous hemorrhage than ranibizumab alone through the 2 years. BCVA did not differ significantly between the two groups at months 12 and 24 of the follow-up. The “ranibizumab” alone group presented greater reduction in central retinal thickness at month 12, which did not reach significance at month 24 compared to “combination” group. Greater number of injections was needed in the monotherapy group (mean 14 injections) compared to “combination” group (mean 11 injections) through month 24.

Conclusions

Both intravitreal ranibizumab alone or in combination with PRP could be used effectively for the treatment of PDR and coexistent DME. Even though there was no difference in BCVA and CRT at the 24-month follow-up between the two groups, the combination group presented greater regression of neovascularization with less injections.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. International Diabetes Federation (2015) IDF diabetes atlas, 7th edn. International Diabetes Federation, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  2. Das A (2016) Diabetic retinopathy: battling the global epidemic. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 57:6669–6682

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Forbes JM, Cooper ME (2013) Mechanisms of diabetic complications. Physiol Rev 93:137–188

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Antonetti DA, Klein R, Gardner TW (2012) Diabetic retinopathy. N Engl J Med 366:1227–1239

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. The Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group (1981) Photocoagulation treatment of proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Clinical application of diabetic retinopathy study (DRS) findings, DRS report number 8. Ophthalmology 88:583–600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group (1985) Photocoagulation for diabetic macular edema. Early treatment diabetic retinopathy study report number 1. Arch Ophthalmol 103:1796–1806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Yau JW, Rogers SL, Kawasaki R et al (2012) Global prevalence and major risk factors of diabetic retinopathy. Diabetes Care 35:556–564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Klein R, Klein BE, Moss SE, Cruickshanks KJ (1995) The Wisconsin epidemiologic study of diabetic retinopathy. XV. The long-term incidence of macular edema. Ophthalmology 102:7–16

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Das A, McGuire PG, Rangasamy S (2015) Diabetic macular edema: pathophysiology and novel therapeutic targets. Ophthalmology 122:1375–1394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mitchell P, Bandello F, Schmidt-Erfurth U et al (2011) The RESTORE study: ranibizumab monotherapy or combined with laser versus laser monotherapy for diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology 118:615–625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Heier JS, Korobelnik JF, Brown DM et al (2016) Intravitreal aflibercept for diabetic macular edema: 148-week results from the VISTA and VIVID studies. Ophthalmology 123:2376–2385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Stewart S, Yeong JL, Virgili G, Azuara-Blanco A, Lois N (2020) Pragmatism of randomized clinical trials on ranibizumab for the treatment of diabetic macular edema: impact on clinical outcomes. Retina 40:919–927

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gross JG, Glassman AR, Liu D et al (2018) Five-year outcomes of panretinal photocoagulation vs intravitreous ranibizumab for proliferative diabetic retinopathy: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Ophthalmol 136:1138–1148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gross JG, Glassman AR, Jampol LM et al (2015) Panretinal photocoagulation vs intravitreous ranibizumab for proliferative diabetic retinopathy: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 314:2137–2146

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhao Y, Singh RP (2018) The role of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) in the management of proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Drugs Context 7:212532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Couturier A, Rey PA, Erginay A et al (2019) Widefield OCT-angiography and fluorescein angiography assessments of nonperfusion in diabetic retinopathy and edema treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor. Ophthalmology 126:1685–1694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lorusso M, Milano V, Nikolopoulou E et al (2019) Panretinal photocoagulation does not change macular perfusion in eyes with proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 50:174–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Russell JF, Al-Khersan H, Shi Y et al (2020) Retinal non-perfusion in proliferative diabetic retinopathy before and after panretinal photocoagulation assessed by wide field OCT angiography. Am J Ophthalmol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2020.01.024

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sivaprasad S, Prevost AT, Vasconcelos JC et al (2017) Clinical efficacy of intravitreal aflibercept versus panretinal photocoagulation for best corrected visual acuity in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy at 52 weeks (CLARITY): a multicentre, single-blinded, randomised, controlled, phase 2b, non-inferiority trial. Lancet 389:2193–2203

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hutton DW, Stein JD, Glassman AR et al (2019) Five-year cost-effectiveness of intravitreous ranibizumab therapy vs panretinal photocoagulation for treating proliferative diabetic retinopathy: a secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Ophthalmol. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2019.4284

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Figueira J, Fletcher E, Massin P et al (2018) Ranibizumab plus panretinal photocoagulation versus panretinal photocoagulation alone for high-risk proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PROTEUS Study). Ophthalmology 125:691–700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Deák GG, Schmidt-Erfurth UM, Jampol LM (2018) Correlation of central retinal thickness and visual acuity in diabetic macular edema. JAMA Ophthalmol 136:1215–1216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Islam F (2016) Retinal thickness and visual acuity in diabetic macular edema: an optical coherence tomography-based study. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 26:598–601

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Obeid A, Su D, Patel SN et al (2019) Outcomes of eyes lost to follow-up with proliferative diabetic retinopathy that received panretinal photocoagulation versus intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor. Ophthalmology 126:407–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wubben TJ, Johnson MW, Anti-VEGF Treatment Interruption Study Group (2019) Anti-Vascular endothelial growth factor therapy for diabetic retinopathy: consequences of inadvertent treatment interruptions. Am J Ophthalmol 204:13–18

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was received for this research.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. 2nd Department of Ophthalmology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece

    Irini Chatziralli, Eleni Dimitriou, George Theodossiadis, Dimitrios Kazantzis & Panagiotis Theodossiadis

  2. Attikon University Hospital, 1, Rimini Street, 12462, Haidari, Greece

    Irini Chatziralli

Authors
  1. Irini Chatziralli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Eleni Dimitriou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. George Theodossiadis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Dimitrios Kazantzis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Panagiotis Theodossiadis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

IC conceived and designed the study, collected and interpreted data, performed the statistical analysis and drafted the manuscript; ED and DK collected data; GT interpreted data and critically revised the manuscript; PT had the supervision of the study and critically revised the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the current version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Irini Chatziralli.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria, educational grants or other equity interest), or non-financial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

Ethical standard statement

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Attikon Hospital, Athens, Greece (ebd301/2015).

Informed consent

All participants gave written informed consent for participation in the study.

Availability of data and material

All data will be available upon request.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article belongs to the topical collection Eye Complications of Diabetes, managed by Giuseppe Querques.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chatziralli, I., Dimitriou, E., Theodossiadis, G. et al. Intravitreal ranibizumab alone or in combination with panretinal photocoagulation for the treatment of proliferative diabetic retinopathy with coexistent macular edema: long-term outcomes of a prospective study. Acta Diabetol 57, 1219–1225 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00592-020-01548-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00592-020-01548-y

Keywords

  • Diabetic macular edema
  • Proliferative diabetic retinopathy
  • Optical coherence tomography
  • Ranibizumab
  • Treatment
  • Anti-VEGF