Screening and diagnosis of gestational diabetes in India: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- 62 Downloads
Although diabetes is rapidly increasing in India, there is no national consensus on best practices for screening, diagnosis, and management of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). The goal of this study was to systematically review the literature for studies reporting the prevalence and screening and diagnostic methods for gestational diabetes in India.
We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and POPLINE for studies on screening for GDM in India. We included English-language full reports and conference abstracts of cross-sectional studies, prospective, and retrospective cohorts that reported the screening method and prevalence of GDM. We performed descriptive analysis on all studies and meta-analysis, meta-regression, and subgroup meta-analysis on studies with medium or low risk of bias.
We included 64 studies reporting 90 prevalence estimates. Prevalence estimates ranged from 0 to 41.9%. Subset meta-analyses showed that the IADPSG diagnostic criteria found significantly more GDM cases (prevalence = 19.19% [15.5, 23.6], p < 0.05) than the WHO 1999 criteria (10.13% [8.17, 12.50]) and DIPSI criteria (7.37% [5.2, 10.16]). Studies that compared the IADPSG and WHO 1999 criteria showed poor positive agreement (33–79%). Studies specifying time of GDM diagnosis showed that patients (11–60%) develop GDM as early as the first trimester, but many GDM cases (16–40%) are missed if screened only at first visit.
In India, prevalence estimates of GDM vary substantially by diagnostic criteria. When evaluating screening and diagnostic criteria for GDM, providers should consider their patients’ needs and correlate screening criteria with pregnancy outcomes.
KeywordsGestational diabetes Pregnancy India Screening
We would like to thank Weill Cornell Medicine librarians Kevin J. Pain and Becky B. Nelson for their assistance with searching the literature; Elizabeth Mauer for her assistance in conducting meta-analysis; and Dr. Amita Gupta for her input on writing.
JSM and KL motivated and conceived of the study. KL and SN searched for literature and analyzed results. KL, MA, and JSM interpreted the results. KL wrote the article. MA and JSM critically reviewed the article. All authors reviewed and edited the article.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
All the author declares that they have no conflict of interest.
As this was a review study, no ethics approval was required.
As this was a review study, no informed consent was required.
Consent for publication
All authors provided consent for publication.
- 1.IDF (2015) IDF Diabetes Atlas 2015. http://www.diabetesatlas.org/
- 2.WHO (2013) Diagnostic criteria and classification of hyperglycaemia first detected in pregnancy. WHO, GenevaGoogle Scholar
- 5.Gupta Y, Kalra B (2016) Screening and diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus. JPMA 66(9 Suppl 1):S19–S21Google Scholar
- 10.Babu GR, Tejaswi B, Kalavathi M et al (2015) Assessment of screening practices for gestational hyperglycaemia in public health facilities: a descriptive study in bangalore. India. J Pub Health Res 4(1):448Google Scholar
- 25.Nayak PK, Mitra S, Sahoo JP, Daniel M, Mathew A, Padma A (2013) Feto-maternal outcomes in women with and without gestational diabetes mellitus according to the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) diagnostic criteria. Diabetes Metab Syndr 7(4):206–209CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 40.Ghosh S, Ghosh K (2013) Maternal and neonatal outcomes in gestational diabetes mellitus. J Indian Med Assoc 111(5):330–1, 336Google Scholar
- 45.Mounika K, Sarraswathi K, Kalavathy V (2015) Study of 100 cases of gestational diabetes in Sree Balaji Medical College and Hospital (SBMCH), Tamil Nadu, India. Res J Pharm Biol Chem Sci 6(5):592–596Google Scholar
- 51.Satodiya M, Takkar N, Goel P, Kaur J (2016) Comparison of one-step versus two-step screening for diagnosis of GDM in Indian population: a randomized controlled trial. J Obstet Gynecol India 67(3):1–6Google Scholar
- 67.Mahalakshmi MM, Bhavadharini B, Maheswari K et al (2016) Comparison of maternal and fetal outcomes among Asian Indian pregnant women with or without gestational diabetes mellitus: a situational analysis study (WINGS-3). Indian J Endocrinol Metab 20(4):491–496CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 70.Mehta P, Patnaik J (2015) A study on prevalence of gestational diabetes and its feto-maternal outcome in a medical college of Odisha. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol 1:96Google Scholar
- 71.Nilakhe SD, Ramavataram DVSS, Sambahre V, Nandeshwar AS (2016) Prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus: study based on IADPSG and recent who diagnostic criteria with special reference to Hb A1c. Indian J 31(1 Supplement 1):S84Google Scholar
- 74.Sawant AP, Naik SS, Nagarkar VD, Shinde AV (2011) Screening for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) with oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) in sai shirdi rural area of Maharashtra state. Biomed Res 22(2):203–206Google Scholar
- 77.Nayak PK, Mitra S, Sahoo J, Kamalnathan S (2014) Comparison of the world health organization and the international association of diabetes and pregnancy study groups criteria in diagnosing gestational diabetes mellitus in South Indians. Indian J Endocrinol Metab 18(3):433–434CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 79.Farrar D, Duley L, Dowswell T, Lawlor DA (2017) Different strategies for diagnosing gestational diabetes to improve maternal and infant health. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017(8):CD007122Google Scholar
- 80.Wendland EM, Torloni MR, Falavigna M et al (2012) Gestational diabetes and pregnancy outcomes—a systematic review of the World Health Organization (WHO) and the International Association of Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) diagnostic criteria. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 12(1):23CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 82.Duran A, Sáenz S, Torrejón MJ, Bordiú E, Valle L, Galindo M (2014) Introduction of IADPSG criteria for the screening and diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus results in improved pregnancy outcomes at a lower cost in a large cohort of pregnant women: the St.Carlos Gestational Diabetes Study. Diabetes Care 37(9):2442–2450CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 85.Jenum AK, Morkrid K, Sletner L et al (2012) Impact of ethnicity on gestational diabetes identified with the WHO and the modified International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups criteria: a population-based cohort study.[Erratum appears in Eur J Endocrinol. 2012 Mar; 166(3):561 Note: Vange, Siri [corrected to Vangen, Siri]]. Eur 166(2):317–324Google Scholar
- 86.Seshlah V, Sahay BK, Das AK et al (2009) Gestational diabetes mellitus—Indian guidelines. J Indian Med Assoc 107(11):799–806Google Scholar
- 95.American Diabetes Association (2003) Report of the expert committee on the diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 26(suppl 1):s5–s20Google Scholar
- 100.WHO (1999) Definition, diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus and its complications. Report of a WHO consultation, GenevaGoogle Scholar