Skip to main content

Health literacy in type 2 diabetes patients: a systematic review of systematic reviews

Abstract

Aim To summarize, critically review, and interpret the evidence related to the systematic reviews on health literacy (HL) amongst type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Methods The methodology for this study consisted of a systematic review of systematic reviews, using the PRISMA statement and flowchart to select studies, and searching on PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, and Cochrane. The search covered the period between January 2006 and June 2016. Results From the 115 identified record by the queries, only six systematic reviews were included, following a quality evaluation using AMSTAR. The included systematic reviews content was analyzed by the independent work of two authors, using a narrative synthesis approach. The findings of this study (i.e., main themes) are areas of consensus and gaps in knowledge. Areas of consensus are HL definition, HL measurement tools, and the relationship between T2DM patient knowledge (or literacy) and his/her HL. The gaps in knowledge were the assessment of the relations between HL and health outcomes and self-efficacy, the gender differences, the effectiveness of interventions to improve HL, the cost-effectiveness study of interventions to improve HL, and the understanding of the influence of organizational environment on HL. Conclusion This review provides a current state of knowledge to address clinical practice and research proposals. HL could be useful to personalize patients' follow-up and it should be routinely assessed in its three dimensions (i.e. functional, interactive and critical) to enhance patients' ability to cope with clinical recommendations. Future research should be mainly aimed to test the effectiveness of evidence-based interventions to improve HL amongst T2DM patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. 1.

    IDF (2015) IDF Diabetes Atlas 7th edn., vol 144. http://www.diabetesatlas.org/

  2. 2.

    Ogurtsova K, da Rocha Fernandes JD, Huang Y et al (2017) IDF diabetes atlas: global estimates for the prevalence of diabetes for 2015 and 2040. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 128:40–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2017.03.024

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Guariguata L, Whiting DR, Hambleton I et al (2014) Global estimates of diabetes prevalence for 2013 and projections for 2035. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 103:137–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2013.11.002

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Ausili D, Bulgheroni M, Ballatore P et al (2017) Self-care, quality of life and clinical outcomes of type 2 diabetes patients: an observational cross-sectional study. Acta Diabetol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00592-017-1035-5

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Eichler K, Wieser S, Brügger U (2009) The costs of limited health literacy: a systematic review. Int J Public Health 54:313–324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-009-0058-2

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Al Sayah F, Johnson ST, Vallance J (2016) Health literacy, pedometer, and self-reported walking among older adults. Am J Public Health 106:327–333. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2015.302901

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Osborn CY, Cavanaugh K, Wallston KA, Rothman RL (2010) Self-efficacy links health literacy and numeracy to glycemic control. J Health Commun 15:146–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2010.499980

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Hamer S, Collinson G (2014) Achieving evidence-based practice: a handbook for practitioners, 2nd edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Eichler K, Wieser S, Brügger U (2009) The costs of limited health literacy: a systematic review. Int J Public Health 54:313–324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-009-0058-2

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Friis K, Lasgaard M, Osborne RH, Maindal HT (2016) Gaps in understanding health and engagement with healthcare providers across common long-term conditions: a population survey of health literacy in 29 473 Danish citizens. BMJ Open 6:e009627. https://doi.org/10.1136/BMJOPEN-2015-009627

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Powell CK, Hill EG, Clancy DE (2007) The relationship between health literacy and diabetes knowledge and readiness to take health actions. Diabetes Educ 33:144–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145721706297452

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Rothman RL, DeWalt DA, Malone R et al (2004) Influence of patient literacy on the effectiveness of a primary care-based diabetes disease management program. Jama 292:552–557. https://doi.org/10.1001/JAMA.292.14.1711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Loke YK, Hinz I, Wang X, Salter C (2012) Systematic review of consistency between adherence to cardiovascular or diabetes medication and health literacy in older adults. Ann Pharmacother 46:863–872. https://doi.org/10.1345/aph.1Q718

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Nielsen-Bohlman L, Panzer AM, Kindig DA (2004) Health literacy. National Academies Press, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.17226/10883

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Nutbeam D (2008) The evolving concept of health literacy. Soc Sci Med 67:2072–2078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.09.050

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Green JA, Mor MK, Shields AM et al (2013) Associations of health literacy with dialysis adherence and health resource utilization in patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis. Am J Kidney Dis 62:73–80. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2012.12.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Bailey SC, Brega AG, Crutchfield TM et al (2014) Update on health literacy and diabetes. Diabetes Educ 40:581–604. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145721714540220

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    McNaughton CD, Jacobson TA, Kripalani S (2014) Low literacy is associated with uncontrolled blood pressure in primary care patients with hypertension and heart disease. Patient Educ Couns 96:165–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2014.05.007

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Hahn EA, Burns JL, Jacobs EA et al (2015) Health literacy and patient-reported outcomes: a cross-sectional study of underserved English- and Spanish-speaking patients with type 2 diabetes. J Health Commun 20:4–15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Matsuoka S, Tsuchihashi-Makaya M, Kayane T et al (2016) Health literacy is independently associated with self-care behavior in patients with heart failure. Patient Educ Couns. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2016.01.003

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Ishikawa H, Takeuchi T, Yano E (2008) Measuring functional, communicative, and critical health literacy among diabetic patients. Diabetes Care 31:874–879. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc07-1932

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Heisler M, Piette JD, Spencer M et al (2005) The relationship between knowledge of recent HbA1c values and diabetes care understanding and self-management. Diabetes Care 28:816–822. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.28.4.816

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Asche C, LaFleur J, Conner C (2011) A review of diabetes treatment adherence and the association with clinical and economic outcomes. Clin Ther 33:74–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinthera.2011.01.019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Gao J, Wang J, Zheng P et al (2013) Effects of self-care, self-efficacy, social support on glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes. BMC Fam Pract 141(14):1090–1101. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-14-66

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Caruso R, Arrigoni C, Magon A et al (2017) Health determinants in Italian type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients: a critical gender differences analysis. J Res Gend Stud 7:93–108. https://doi.org/10.22381/JRGS7220176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Mårtensson L, Hensing G (2012) Health literacy—a heterogeneous phenomenon: a literature review. Scand J Caring Sci 26:151–160. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6712.2011.00900.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Al Sayah F, Majumdar SR, Williams B et al (2013) Health literacy and health outcomes in diabetes: a systematic review. J Gen Intern Med 28:444–452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-012-2241-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Smith V, Devane D, Begley CM, Clarke M (2011) Methodology in conducting a systematic review of systematic reviews of healthcare interventions. BMC Med Res Methodol 111(11):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-11-15

    Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Becker L, Oxman A (2008) Overviews of reviews. In: Higgins J, Green S (eds) Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Cochrane B Series. Wiley, Chippenham, pp 607–631

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J et al (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 6:e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J et al (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ 339:b2700. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2700

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Shea BJ, Grimshaw JM, Wells GA et al (2007) Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol 71(7):1085–1086. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-7-10

    Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Banerjee M, Capozzoli M, McSweeney L, Sinha D (1999) Beyond kappa: a review of interrater agreement measures. Can J Stat 27:3–23. https://doi.org/10.2307/3315487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Popay J, Roberts H, Sowden A (2006) Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews. A Product from the ESRC Methods Programme. Institute for Health Research, Lancaster University, pp 1–92. http://www.lancaster.ac.uk/shm/research/nssr/research/dissemination/publications.php

  35. 35.

    Al Sayah F, Williams B, Johnson JA (2013) Measuring health literacy in individuals with diabetes: a systematic review and evaluation of available measures. Health Educ Behav 40:42–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198111436341

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Davey J, Holden CA, Smith BJ (2015) The correlates of chronic disease-related health literacy and its components among men: a systematic review. BMC Public Health 15:589. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1900-5

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Fransen MP, von Wagner C, Essink-Bot M-L (2012) Diabetes self-management in patients with low health literacy: ordering findings from literature in a health literacy framework. Patient Educ Couns 88:44–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2011.11.015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Nutbeam D (2000) Health literacy as a public health goal: a challenge for contemporary health education and communication strategies into the 21st century. Health Promot Int 15:259–267. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/15.3.259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Davey J, Holden CA, Smith BJ (2015) The correlates of chronic disease-related health literacy and its components among men: a systematic review. BMC Public Health 15:589. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1900-5

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Bandura A (2001) Social cognitive theory: an agentic perspective. Annu Rev Psychol 52:1–26. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Parschau L, Fleig L, Koring M et al (2013) Positive experience, self-efficacy, and action control predict physical activity changes: a moderated mediation analysis. Br J Health Psychol 18:395–406. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8287.2012.02099.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Sarkar U, Fisher L, Schillinger D (2006) Is self-efficacy associated with diabetes self-management across race/ethnicity and health literacy? Diabetes Care 29:823–829. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.29.04.06.dc05-1615

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Arrigoni C, Caruso R, Campanella F et al (2015) Investigating burnout situations, nurses’ stress perception and effect of a post-graduate education program in health care organizations of northern Italy: a multicenter study. G Ital Med Lav Ergon 37:39–45

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Caruso R, Fida R, Sili A, Arrigoni C (2016) Towards an integrated model of nursing competence: an overview of the literature reviews and concept analysis. Prof Inferm 69:35–43. https://doi.org/10.7429/pi.2016.691035

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Cavanaugh K, Huizinga M, Wallston K (2008) Association of numeracy and diabetes control. Ann Int 148:737–746. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-148-10-200805200-00006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Vassy JL, O’Brien KE, Waxler JL et al (2012) Impact of literacy and numeracy on motivation for behavior change after diabetes genetic risk testing. Med Decis Mak 32:606–615. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X11431608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    White RO, DeWalt DA, Malone RM et al (2010) Leveling the field: addressing health disparities through diabetes disease management. Am J Manag Care 16:42–48

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Mbaezue N, Mayberry R, Gazmararian J et al (2010) The impact of health literacy on self-monitoring of blood glucose in patients with diabetes receiving care in an inner-city hospital. J Natl Med Assoc 102:5–9

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Karter AJ, Subramanian U, Saha C et al (2010) Barriers to Insulin initiation. Diabetes Care 33:733–735. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc09-1184

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Bains SS, Egede LE (2011) Associations between health literacy, diabetes knowledge, self-care behaviors, and glycemic control in a low income population with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther 13:335–341. https://doi.org/10.1089/dia.2010.0160

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Caruso R, Pittella F, Zaghini F et al (2016) Development and validation of the nursing profession self-efficacy scale. Int Nurs Rev 63:455–464. https://doi.org/10.1111/inr.12291

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    WHO (2015) Death and DALY estimates for 2004 by cause for WHO member states: persons, all ages. World Health Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Baker P, Dworkin SL, Tong S et al (2014) The men’s health gap: men must be included in the global health equity agenda. Bull World Health Organ 92:618–620. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.13.132795

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Kemppainen V, Tossavainen K, Turunen H (2013) Nurses’ roles in health promotion practice: an integrative review. Health Promot Int 28:490–501. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/das034

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Whiting DR, Guariguata L, Weil C, Shaw J (2011) IDF diabetes atlas: global estimates of the prevalence of diabetes for 2011 and 2030. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 94:311–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2011.10.029

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was funded by local research funds of the IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, a Clinical Research Hospital partially funded by the Italian Ministry of Health.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Davide Ausili.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and animal rights

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by the any of the authors.

Informed consent

Not applicable.

Additional information

Managed by Massimo Porta.

Appendix 1. Queries used for the systematic review of systematic reviews search

Appendix 1. Queries used for the systematic review of systematic reviews search

Database Query Date of the search Number of papers
PubMed ((systematic review [ti] OR meta-analysis [pt] OR meta-analysis [ti] OR systematic literature review [ti] OR this systematic review [tw] OR pooling project [tw] OR (systematic review [tiab] AND review [pt]) OR meta synthesis [ti] OR meta synthesis [ti] OR integrative review [tw] OR integrative research review [tw] OR rapid review [tw] OR consensus development conference [pt] OR practice guideline [pt] OR drug class reviews [ti] OR cochrane database syst rev [ta] OR acp journal club [ta] OR health technol assess [ta] OR evid rep technol assess summ [ta] OR jbi database system rev implement rep [ta]) OR (clinical guideline [tw] AND management [tw]) OR ((evidence based[ti] OR evidence-based medicine [mh] OR best practice* [ti] OR evidence synthesis [tiab]) AND (review [pt] OR diseases category[mh] OR behavior and behavior mechanisms [mh] OR therapeutics [mh] OR evaluation studies[pt] OR validation studies[pt] OR guideline [pt] OR pmcbook)) OR ((systematic [tw] OR systematically [tw] OR critical [tiab] OR (study selection [tw]) OR (predetermined [tw] OR inclusion [tw] AND criteri* [tw]) OR exclusion criteri* [tw] OR main outcome measures [tw] OR standard of care [tw] OR standards of care [tw]) AND (survey [tiab] OR surveys [tiab] OR overview* [tw] OR review [tiab] OR reviews [tiab] OR search* [tw] OR handsearch [tw] OR analysis [ti] OR critique [tiab] OR appraisal [tw] OR (reduction [tw]AND (risk [mh] OR risk [tw]) AND (death OR recurrence))) AND (literature [tiab] OR articles [tiab] OR publications [tiab] OR publication [tiab] OR bibliography [tiab] OR bibliographies [tiab] OR published [tiab] OR pooled data [tw] OR unpublished [tw] OR citation [tw] OR citations [tw] OR database [tiab] OR internet [tiab] OR textbooks [tiab] OR references [tw] OR scales [tw] OR papers [tw] OR datasets [tw] OR trials [tiab] OR meta-analy* [tw] OR (clinical [tiab] AND studies [tiab]) OR treatment outcome [mh] OR treatment outcome [tw] OR pmcbook)) NOT (letter [pt] OR newspaper article [pt]))) AND ((((“diabetes mellitus”[MeSH Terms] OR (“diabetes”[All Fields] AND “mellitus”[All Fields]) OR “diabetes mellitus”[All Fields]))) AND ((health[ti] AND literacy[ti]) OR (“health literacy” OR “health literate” OR “medical literacy”) OR (functional[tw] AND health[tw] AND literacy[tw]) OR numeracy OR ((low literate[ti] OR low literacy[ti] OR literacy[ti] OR illiteracy[ti] OR literate[ti] OR illiterate[ti] OR reading[mh] OR comprehension[mh]) AND (health promotion[major] OR health education[major] OR patient education[major] OR Communication Barriers[major] OR communication[major:noexp] OR Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice[major] OR attitude to health[major])) OR (comprehension[major] AND educational status[major]) OR (family[ti] AND literacy[ti]) OR ((“drug labeling” OR Prescriptions [mh]) AND (“comprehension” OR “numeracy”)) OR ((cancer[ti] OR diabetes[ti]) AND (literacy[ti] OR comprehension[ti])) OR “adult literacy” OR “limited literacy” OR “patient understanding”[ti] OR (self care [major] AND perception[mh]) OR (comprehension AND food labeling[mh]) OR (comprehension AND informed consent) OR (comprehension AND insurance, health) AND English[la])) 08 June 2016 20
Cinahl (Health literacy) AND (diabetes)—Limiters—Publication Type: Review; Language: English—Search modes—Boolean/Phrase 8 June 2016 5
Scopus TITLE-ABS-KEY-AUTH ((health literacy) AND (diabetes)) AND DOCTYPE (re) AND PUBYEAR > 2005 AND PUBYEAR < 2017 AND (LIMIT-TO (LANGUAGE, “English”)) 8 June 2016 90
Cochrane (Health literacy) AND (diabetes)- Title, Abstract, Keywords—Publication Year from 2006 to 2016 8 June 2016 0

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Caruso, R., Magon, A., Baroni, I. et al. Health literacy in type 2 diabetes patients: a systematic review of systematic reviews. Acta Diabetol 55, 1–12 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00592-017-1071-1

Download citation

Keywords

  • Health literacy
  • Type 2 diabetes mellitus
  • Diabetes mellitus
  • Systematic review
  • Diabetes knowledge
  • Health outcomes