Skip to main content
Log in

Insulin dose adjustment when changing from multiple daily injections to continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion in the pediatric age group

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Acta Diabetologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study is to determine the proper initial dose adjustment when switching from multiple daily injections to continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion for type-1 diabetic pediatric patients. Our hypothesis is that the insulin adjustment varies depending on the pubertal status and the previous long-acting insulin used. Charts of 60 patients were reviewed. Data regarding insulin dose, type of insulin administrated, HbA1c, BMI, severe hypoglycemia and DKA events were collected during the previous year and after 6 weeks of pump therapy. In the prepubertal patients the reduction was 19% (26% if the previous insulin used was detemir). Pubertal patients experienced a decrease of 26%, and the detemir group 33%. The ratio long acting-basal/short acting-bolus insulin changed from 1.26 ± 0.84 to 0.93 ± 0.46 (P < 0.05). The total daily insulin dose needs to be decreased. Basal insulin constitutes 40–45% in prepubertal and 45–50% in pubertal patients. The reduction is different depending on the previous long-acting insulin used; being greater if the insulin is detemir.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Maniatis A, Klingesmith G, Slover R, Mowry C, Chase P (2001) Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion for children and adolescents: an option for routine diabetes care. Pediatrics 107:351–356

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Willi S, Planton J, Egede L, Schwarz S (2003) Benefits of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion in children with type 1 diabetes. J Pediatr 143:796–801

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Litton J, Rice A, Friedman N, Oden J, Lee M, Freemerk M (2002) Insulin pump therapy in toddlers and preschool children with type 1 diabetes mellitus. J Pediatr 141:490–495

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. McMahon S, Airey L, Marangou D, McElwee K, Carne C, Clarey A et al (2005) Insulin pump therapy in children and adolescents: improvements in key parameters of diabetes management including quality of life. Diabet Med 22:92–96

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Plotnick L, Clark L, Brancati F, Erlinger T (2003) Safety and effectiveness of insulin pump therapy in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 26:1142–1146

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Weinzimer S, Ahern J, Doyle E, Vincent M, Dziura J, Steffen A et al (2004) Persistence of benefits of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion in very young children with type 1 diabetes: a follow-up report. Pediatrics 114:1601–1605

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. DiMeglio L, Pottorff T, Boyd S, France L, Fineberg N, Eugster E (2004) A randomized, controlled study of insulin pump therapy in diabetic preschoolers. J Pediatr 145:380–384

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wilson D, Buckingham B, Kunselman E, Sullivan M, Paguntalan H, Gitelman S (2005) A two-center randomized controlled feasibility trial of insulin pump therapy in young children with diabetes. Diabetes Care 28:15–19

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Boland E, Grey M, Oesterle A, Fredrickson L, Tamborlane W (1999) Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion. Diabetes Care 22:1779–1784

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ahern J, Boland E, Doane R et al (2002) Insulin pump therapy in pediatrics: a therapeutic alternative to safely lower HbA1c levels across all age groups. Pediatr Diabetes 3:10–15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Conrad S, McGrath M, Gitelman S (2002) Transition from multiple daily injections to continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion in type 1 diabetes mellitus. J Pediatr 140:235–240

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Liberatore R Jr, Perlman K, Buccino J, Artiles-Sisk A, Daneman D (2004) Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion pump treatment in children with type 1 diabetes mellitus. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 17(2):223–226

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Phillip M, Battelino T, Rodriguez H et al (2007) Use of insulin pump therapy in the pediatric age-group: consensus statement from the European Society for Paediatric Endocrinology, the Lawson Wilkins Pediatric Endocrine Society, and the International Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Diabetes, endorsed by the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes. Diabetes Care 30(6):1653–1662

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kaufman F, Halvorson M, Miller D, Mackenzie M, Fisher L, Pitukcheewanont P (1999) Insulin pump therapy in type 1 pediatric patients: now and into the year 2000. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 15:338–352

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hanas R (2002) Selection for and initiation of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion. Horm Res 57(suppl 1):101–104

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Danne T, von Schutz W, Lange K, Nestoris C, Datz N, Kordonouri O (2006) Current practice of insulin pump therapy in children and adolescents—the Hanover recipe. Pediatr Diabetes 7(Suppl 4):25–31

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bulsara M, Holman C, Davis E, Jones T (2004) The impact of a decade of changing treatment on rates of severe hypoglycemia in a population-based cohort of children with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 27:2293–2298

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Knerr I, Hofer E, Holterhust P et al (2007) Prevailing therapeutic regimes and predictive factors for prandial insulin substitution in 26687 children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes in Germany and Austria. Diabet Med 24(12):1478–1481

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hernandez M, Castellet J, Narvaiza J, Rincón J, Ruiz I, Sánchez E et al (1988) Curvas y tablas de crecimiento. Garsi, Madrid

  20. Siverstein J, Klingensmith G, Copeland K et al (2005) Care of children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 1:186–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sulli N, Shashaj B (2006) Long-term benefits of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion in children with type 1 diabetes: a 4-year follow-up. Diabet Med 23:900–906

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Berhe T, Postellon D, Wilson B, Stone R (2006) Feasibility and safety of insulin pump therapy in children aged 2 to 7 years with type 1 diabetes: a retrospective study. Pediatrics 117:2132–2137

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Robertson K, Schoenle E, Gucev Z, Mordhorst L, Gall M, Ludvigsson J (2007) Insulin detemir compared with NPH insulin in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Diabet Med 24:27–34

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Porcelatti F, Rossetti P, Ricci Busciantella N et al (2007) Comparison of pharmacokinetics and dynamics of the long-acting insulin analogs glargine and detemir at steady state in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 30:2447–2452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Klinkert C, Bachran R, Heidtmann B, Grabert M, Holl R (2008) Age-specific characteristics of the basal insulin rate for pediatric patients on CSII. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes 116:118–122

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Research fund was granted to E. Colino by Fundación Miguel Servet.

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raquel Barrio.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Colino, E., Álvarez, M.Á., Carcavilla, A. et al. Insulin dose adjustment when changing from multiple daily injections to continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion in the pediatric age group. Acta Diabetol 47 (Suppl 1), 1–6 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00592-009-0103-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00592-009-0103-x

Keywords

Navigation