Abstract
Purpose
When compared to standard-length humeral stem in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA), short humeral stems in RTSA require good proximal humeral metaphyseal bone quality to gain proper and secure fixation during prosthetic implantation. Shorter humeral stems potentially carry more risk of misalignment than standard or long humeral stems. The hypothesis was that misalignment of the short humeral stems is influenced by regional bone quality.
Methods
RTSA with a short curved humeral stem with neck-shaft angle (NSA) default of 132.5° was reviewed. The study group included 35 cases at a mean age of 75.97 (± 6.23) years. Deltoid-tuberosity index (DTI) was measured to evaluate proximal humeral bone quality. The deltoid tuberosity index was measured at immediately above position of the upper end of the deltoid tuberosity. Stem alignment was given by the angle measured in degrees between the intramedullary humeral shaft axis and the axis of the humeral implant stem.
Results
The patient’s mean DTI was 1.37 ± 0.16 (median, 1.32; range, 1.12–1.80). 22 patients had poor bone quality (DTI < 1.4), compared to 13 patients with acceptable bone quality (DTI > 1.4). After RTSA, ten humeral components (29%) were neutrally aligned, whereas 25 humeral components (71%) were misaligned. There was no correlation between misalignment and DTI (r = 0.117; p = 0.504). But there was a strong correlation between misalignment and the patient’s own NSA (r = − 0.47; p = 0.004). The postoperative stem position and stem misalignment are not associated with functional outcomes (p > 0.05).
Conclusion
The misalignment of the short curved humeral stem frequently occurs. Poor reginal humeral bone quality does not influence misalignment after RTSA with a short humeral stem. Postoperative stem alignment is associated with the patient’s preoperative NSA and method of neck cut. The misalignment does not affect functional outcomes for midterm follow-up. Further long-term follow-up studies are needed to confirm its clinical relevance.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Erickson BJ, Bohl DD, Cole BJ, Verma NN, Nicholson G, Romeo AA, Harris JD (2018) Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: indications and techniques across the world. Am J Orthop. https://doi.org/10.12788/ajo.2018.0079
Raiss P, Schnetzke M, Wittmann T, Kilian CM, Edwards TB, Denard PJ, Neyton L, Godeneche A, Walch G (2019) Postoperative radiographic findings of an uncemented convertible short stem for anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 28(4):715–723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2018.08.037
Gupta AK, Harris JD, Erickson BJ, Abrams GD, Bruce B, McCormick F, Nicholson GP, Romeo AA (2015) Surgical management of complex proximal humerus fractures-a systematic review of 92 studies including 4500 patients. J Orthop Trauma 29(1):54–59. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000000229
Testa EJ, Albright JA, Lemme NJ, Molla V, McCrae B, Daniels AH, Paxton ES (2023) Increased risk of periprosthetic fractures and revision arthroplasty in patients undergoing shoulder arthroplasty with a history of prior fragility fractures: a matched cohort analysis. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 31(9):e473–e480. https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-22-00752
Ascione F, Domos P, Guarrella V, Chelli M, Boileau P, Walch G (2018) Long-term humeral complications after grammont-style reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 27(6):1065–1071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2017.11.028
Levy O, Narvani A, Hous N, Abraham R, Relwani J, Pradhan R, Bruguera J, Sforza G, Atoun E (2016) Reverse shoulder arthroplasty with a cementless short metaphyseal humeral implant without a stem: clinical and radiologic outcomes in prospective 2- to 7-year follow-up study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 25(8):1362–1370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2015.12.017
Atoun E, Van Tongel A, Hous N, Narvani A, Relwani J, Abraham R, Levy O (2014) Reverse shoulder arthroplasty with a short metaphyseal humeral stem. Int Orthop 38(6):1213–1218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-014-2328-8
Boileau P, Walch G (1997) The three-dimensional geometry of the proximal humerus. Implications for surgical technique and prosthetic design. J Bone Joint Surg Br 79(5):857–865. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.79b5.7579
Schnetzke M, Rick S, Raiss P, Walch G, Loew M (2018) Mid-term results of anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis using a short-stemmed cementless humeral component. Bone Joint J 100-B. 5:603–609. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.100B5.BJJ-2017-1102.R2
Razfar N, Reeves JM, Langohr DG, Willing R, Athwal GS, Johnson JA (2016) Comparison of proximal humeral bone stresses between stemless, short stem, and standard stem length: a finite element analysis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 25(7):1076–1083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2015.11.011
Chalmers PN, Boileau P, Romeo AA, Tashjian RZ (2019) Revision reverse shoulder arthroplasty. JAAOS-J Am Acad Orthop Surg 27(12):426–436
Tross AK, Woolson TE, Nolte PC, Schnetzke M, Loew M, Millett PJ (2021) Primary reverse shoulder replacement with a short stem: a systematic literature review. JSES Rev Rep Tech 1(1):7–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xrrt.2020.11.008
Aibinder WR, Bartels DW, Sperling JW, Sanchez-Sotelo J (2019) Mid-term radiological results of a cementless short humeral component in anatomical and reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Bone Joint J 101-b 5:610–614. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.101b5.Bjj-2018-1374.R1
Linke P, Linke C, Neumann J, Werner AW (2023) Midterm clinical outcome of uncemented short-stem reversed shoulder arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 143(6):3025–3036. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-022-04510-5
Schnetzke M, Coda S, Raiss P, Walch G, Loew M (2016) Radiologic bone adaptations on a cementless short-stem shoulder prosthesis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 25(4):650–657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2015.08.044
Abdic S, Athwal GS, Wittmann T, Walch G, Raiss P (2021) Short stem humeral components in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: stem alignment influences the neck-shaft angle. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 141(2):183–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-020-03424-4
Lädermann A, Chiu JC, Cunningham G, Hervé A, Piotton S, Bothorel H, Collin P (2020) Do short stems influence the cervico-diaphyseal angle and the medullary filling after reverse shoulder arthroplasties? Orthop traumatol surg res: OTSR 106(2):241–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2019.12.010
Peduzzi L, Goetzmann T, Wein F, Roche O, Sirveaux F, Mole D, Jacquot A (2019) Proximal humeral bony adaptations with a short uncemented stem for shoulder arthroplasty: a quantitative analysis. JSES Open Access 3(4):278–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jses.2019.09.011
Nagels J, Stokdijk M, Rozing PM (2003) Stress shielding and bone resorption in shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 12(1):35–39. https://doi.org/10.1067/mse.2003.22
Casp AJ, Montgomery SR Jr, Cancienne JM, Brockmeier SF, Werner BC (2020) Osteoporosis and implant-related complications after anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 28(3):121–127. https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-18-00537
Stone MA, Namdari S (2019) Surgical considerations in the treatment of osteoporotic proximal humerus fractures. Orthop Clin North Am 50(2):223–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocl.2018.10.005
Daher M, Fares MY, Boufadel P, Khanna A, Zalaquett Z, Abboud JA (2023) Osteoporosis in the setting of shoulder arthroplasty: a narrative review. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil 14:21514593231182530. https://doi.org/10.1177/21514593231182527
Anderson KD, Ko FC, Virdi AS, Sumner DR, Ross RD (2020) Biomechanics of implant fixation in osteoporotic bone. Curr Osteoporos Rep 18(5):577–586. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11914-020-00614-2
Bernatz JT, Brooks AE, Nguyen BP, Shin ED, Binkley NC, Anderson PA, Grogan BF (2020) Prevalence and treatment of osteoporosis prior to elective shoulder arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Global res rev. https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-20-00204
Hawi N, Tauber M, Messina MJ, Habermeyer P, Martetschlager F (2016) Anatomic stemless shoulder arthroplasty and related outcomes: a systematic review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 17(1):376. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-016-1235-0
Mazzucchelli RA, Jenny K, Zdravkovic V, Erhardt JB, Jost B, Spross C (2018) The influence of local bone quality on fracture pattern in proximal humerus fractures. Injury 49(2):359–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2017.12.020
Pervaiz K, Cabezas A, Downes K, Santoni BG, Frankle MA (2013) Osteoporosis and shoulder osteoarthritis: incidence, risk factors, and surgical implications. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 22(3):e1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2012.05.029
Mather J, MacDermid JC, Faber KJ, Athwal GS (2013) Proximal humerus cortical bone thickness correlates with bone mineral density and can clinically rule out osteoporosis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 22(6):732–738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2012.08.018
Tingart MJ, Apreleva M, von Stechow D, Zurakowski D, Warner JJ (2003) The cortical thickness of the proximal humeral diaphysis predicts bone mineral density of the proximal humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Br 85(4):611–617. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.85b4.12843
Wilson J, Bonner TJ, Head M, Fordham J, Brealey S, Rangan A (2009) Variation in bone mineral density by anatomical site in patients with proximal humeral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91(6):772–775. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.91B6.22346
Krappinger D, Roth T, Gschwentner M, Suckert A, Blauth M, Hengg C, Kralinger F (2012) Preoperative assessment of the cancellous bone mineral density of the proximal humerus using CT data. Skeletal Radiol 41(3):299–304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-011-1174-7
El Maghraoui A, Roux C (2008) DXA scanning in clinical practice QJM. Int J Med 101(8):605–617. https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/hcn022
Buch B, Vall M, Consigliere P, Guillén JA, Cruz E, Natera L (2022) Short stems and stemless shoulder arthroplasty: current concepts review. Arch Bone Joint Surg 10(8):633–647. https://doi.org/10.22038/abjs.2021.53555.2664
Keener JD, Chalmers PN, Yamaguchi K (2017) The humeral implant in shoulder arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 25(6):427–438. https://doi.org/10.5435/jaaos-d-15-00682
Ballmer FT, Sidles JA, Lippitt SB, Matsen FA 3rd (1993) Humeral head prosthetic arthroplasty: surgically relevant geometric considerations. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2(6):296–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/1058-2746(93)90075-r
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Ethical approval
The study was performed in accordance with the ethical standards outlined in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and with the HIPAA regulation. The Institutional Review Board (IRB) of CHA Medical Center reviewed and approved the present retrospective single-center study (IRB No. GM 23-04).
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Lee, HJ., Kim, BK. & Dan, J. Does the proximal humeral bone quality influence alignment after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with short humeral stems?. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-024-03909-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-024-03909-7