Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A comprehensive analysis of the pre- and postoperative responses to each of the 12 Oxford knee score questions one year following knee arthroplasty

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aims

To assess the pre- and postoperative responses to each of the 12 individual Oxford Knee Score (OKS) questions and percentages of those that were better, same or worse after primary knee arthroplasty (KA).

Methods

A single centre retrospective cohort study conducted over a 24-month period which included 3259 patients with completed OKS preoperatively and 1-year after KA. There were 1286 males and 1973 females, with an overall mean age of 70.0 (range 34–94). The mean scores for each question of the OKS were compared between baseline and 1-year. The percentage of patients who reported better, the same or worse postoperative symptoms for each question were calculated and represented on a heatmap.

Results

There were significant (p < 0.001) improvements in all 12 questions, all of which demonstrated moderate (Q2, Q7) or large effect sizes. Improvements in individual question responses varied. Symptoms of pain and limping demonstrated the greatest improvement, with 86% of patients enjoying a positive change in their symptoms. Despite this improvement 1067 (41.4%) continued to have mild to severe pain in their knee, and 442 (17.3%) patients limped often to all the time when walking postoperatively. Whereas other questions that did not improve to the same extent for example washing and drying only improved in 53% of patients but only 347 (13.5%) had moderate/extreme trouble or found it impossible to do this postoperatively. Preoperatively four questions (Q1, Q6, Q7, Q8) demonstrated floor effects, postoperatively all questions apart from question 7 (kneeling) demonstrated ceiling effects.

Conclusion

The mean improvement and outcome at 1-year for each of the 12 questions varied according to the patient’s preoperative response. As a clinical tool, the heatmap (improvement, same and worse) will enable communication to patients about their potential change in their knee specific symptoms according to their preoperative responses.

Level of evidence

Retrospective study, Level III.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Murray DW, Fitzpatrick R, Rogers K et al (2007) The use of the Oxford hip and knee scores. J Bone Jt Surg Ser B 89:1010–1014

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Murray D, Carr A (1998) Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement. J Bone Jt Surg Ser B 80:63–69. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.80B1.7859

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ben-Shlomo Y, Blom A, Boulton C et al (2021) The national joint registry 18th annual report 2021. In: National joint registry 18th annual report 2021

  4. Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Murray D, Carr A (2006) A response to issues raised in a recent paper concerning the Oxford knee score. Knee 13:66–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2005.08.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Collins NJ, Misra D, Felson DT et al (2011) Measures of knee function: international knee documentation committee (IKDC) subjective knee evaluation form, knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS), knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score physical function short form (KOOS-PS), knee Ou. Arthritis Care Res 63:S208–S228. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.20632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Beswick AD, Wylde V, Gooberman-Hill R et al (2012) What proportion of patients report long-term pain after total hip or knee replacement for osteoarthritis? A systematic review of prospective studies in unselected patients. BMJ Open 2:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Clement ND, MacDonald D, Burnett R (2013) Predicting patient satisfaction using the Oxford knee score: where do we draw the line? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-013-1728-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Yap YYW, Edwards KL, Soutakbar H et al (2021) Oxford knee score 1 year after TKR for osteoarthritis with reference to a normative population: what can patients expect? Osteoarthr Cartil Open 3:100143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocarto.2021.100143

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Buus AAØ, Laugesen B, El-Galaly A et al (2022) The potential of dividing the oxford knee score into subscales for predicting clinically meaningful improvements in pain and function of patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. Int J Orthop Trauma Nurs 45:100919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijotn.2021.100919

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Harris K, Dawson J, Doll H et al (2013) Can pain and function be distinguished in the Oxford knee score in a meaningful way? An exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Qual Life Res 22:2561–2568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-013-0393-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Scott CEH, Howie CR, MacDonald D, Biant LC (2010) Predicting dissatisfaction following total knee replacement: a prospective study of 1217 patients. J Bone Jt Surg Ser B 92:1253–1258. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.92B9.24394

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Baker PN, van der Meulen JH, Lewsey J, Gregg PJ (2007) The role of pain and function in determining patient satisfaction after total knee replacement. Data from the national joint registry for England and Wales. J Bone Jt Surg - Ser B 89:893–900. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.89B7.19091

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Tay ML, Monk AP, Frampton CM et al (2023) The strongest Oxford knee score predictors of subsequent revision are overall pain, limping when walking, and knee giving way. J Arthroplast 38:S156-S161.e3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2023.03.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Vijayananthan A, Nawawi O (2008) The importance of good clinical practice guidelines and its role in clinical trials. Biomed Imaging Interv J 4:e5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Makaram N, Lee T, Macdonald D, Clement ND (2020) The verbal Oxford knee score is not clinically different from the written score when assessed before or after total knee arthroplasty. Knee 27:1396–1405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2020.07.098

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. McHorney CA, Tarlov AR (1995) Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate? Qual Life Res 4:293–307. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01593882

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Abbott S, Radha S, Afzal I et al (2023) Patella resurfacing is not associated with a difference in the Oxford knee score after total knee arthroplasty but stair descent is enhanced. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 143:5333–5343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-022-04733-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Clement ND, Edwards J, Afzal I et al (2023) Posterior stabilised total knee arthroplasty is associated with improved post-operative knee specific function, health related quality of life and greater satisfaction when compared to cruciate retaining protheses. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 33:3411–3418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-023-03565-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Leppink J, O’Sullivan P, Winston K (2016) Effect size – large, medium, and small. Perspect Med Educ 5:347–349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-016-0308-y

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Luger M, Schopper C, Krottenthaler ES et al (2023) Not all questions are created equal: the weight of the Oxford knee scores questions in a multicentric validation study. J Orthop Traumatol. https://doi.org/10.1186/s10195-023-00722-6

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Scott CEH, Oliver WM, MacDonald D et al (2016) Predicting dissatisfaction following total knee arthroplasty in patients under 55 years of age. Bone Jt J 98:1625–1634. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.98B12.BJJ-2016-0375.R1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Clark GW, Steer RA, Khan RN et al (2023) Maintaining joint line obliquity optimizes outcomes of functional alignment in total knee arthroplasty in patients with constitutionally varus knees. J Arthroplast 38:S239–S244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2023.04.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Clement ND, Afzal I, Demetriou C et al (2020) There is no clinically important difference in the Oxford knee scores between one and two years after total knee arthroplasty: the one-year score could be used as the benchmark timepoint to assess outcome. Knee 27:1212–1218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2020.05.015

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Beard DJ, Harris K, Dawson J et al (2015) Meaningful changes for the Oxford hip and knee scores after joint replacement surgery. J Clin Epidemiol 68:73–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.08.009

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Womersley A, Clement · Nick, Jones S, et al (2023) Post-traumatic stress disorder is more likely in younger patients undergoing lower limb arthroplasty: impact on function and quality of life. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2023(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00402-023-05050-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Judge A, Arden NK, Cooper C et al (2012) Predictors of outcomes of total knee replacement surgery. Rheumatol (United Kingdom) 51:1804–1813. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kes075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Yapp LZ, Clement ND, Macdonald DJ et al (2020) Changes in expectation fulfillment following total knee arthroplasty: a 10-year follow-up study. J Arthroplast 35:1826–1832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2020.02.064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Clement ND, Afzal I, Demetriou C et al (2020) The preoperative oxford knee score is an independent predictor of achieving a postoperative ceiling score after total knee arthroplasty. Bone Jt J 102:1519–1526. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.102B11.BJJ-2019-1327.R1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ko Y, Lo NN, Yeo SJ et al (2009) Rasch analysis of the Oxford Knee score. Osteoarthr Cartil 17:1163–1169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2009.04.004

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. South West of London Orthopaedic Elective Centre, Epsom, UK

    N. D. Clement, S. Jones, I. Afzal & D. F. Kader

  2. Edinburgh Orthopaedics, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Little France, Edinburgh, EH16 4SA, UK

    N. D. Clement

Authors
  1. N. D. Clement
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S. Jones
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. I. Afzal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. D. F. Kader
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. D. Clement.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

This study was classed as a service evaluation and did not meet the criteria requiring ethical approval. The project was registered with the institution’s audit department and was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and the guidelines for good clinical practice.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Clement, N.D., Jones, S., Afzal, I. et al. A comprehensive analysis of the pre- and postoperative responses to each of the 12 Oxford knee score questions one year following knee arthroplasty. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-024-03870-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-024-03870-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation