Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Interfragmentary strain measurement post-fixation to guide intraoperative decision making: a narrative review

  • General Review
  • Published:
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Interfragmentary strain influences whether a fracture will undergo direct and indirect fracture healing. Orthopedic trauma surgeons modulate strain and create optimal biomechanical environments for specific fracture patterns using fixation constructs. However, objective intraoperative interfragmentary strain measurement does not currently inform fixation strategy in common practice. This review identifies potential methods and technologies to enable intraoperative strain measurement for guiding optimal fracture fixation strategies.

Methods

PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were methodologically queried for manuscripts containing terms related to “bone fracture,” “strain,” “measurement,” and “intraoperative.” Manuscripts were systematically screened for relevance and adjudicated by three reviewers. Relevant articles describing methods to measure interfragmentary strain intraoperatively were summarized.

Results

After removing duplicates, 1404 records were screened initially. There were 49 manuscripts meeting criteria for in-depth review. Of these, four reports were included in this study that described methods applicable to measuring interfragmentary strain intraoperatively. Two of these reports described a method using instrumented staples, one described optical tracking of Kirschner wires, and one described using a digital linear variable displacement transducer with a custom external fixator.

Conclusion

The four reports identified by this review describe potential methods to quantify interfragmentary strain after fixation. However, further studies are needed to confirm the precision and accuracy of these measurements across a range of fractures and fixation methods. Additionally, described methods require the insertion and likely removal of additional implants into the bone. Ideally, innovations that measure interfragmentary strain intraoperatively would provide dynamic biomechanical feedback for the surgeon to proactively modulate construct stability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Marsell R, Einhorn TA (2011) The biology of fracture healing. Injury 42:551–555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2011.03.031

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Wongchai B (2014) Study of the interfragmentary strain and the interfragmentary modulus with changing the distance between plate and femur. Am J Appl Sci 11:356–361. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajassp.2014.356.361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Shapiro F (1988) Cortical bone repair. The relationship of the lacunar-canalicular system and intercellular gap junctions to the repair process. J Bone Joint Surg Am 70:1067–1081

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hak DJ, Toker S, Yi C, Toreson J (2010) The influence of fracture fixation biomechanics on fracture healing. Orthopedics 33:752–755. https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20100826-20

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Foster AL, Moriarty TF, Zalavras C et al (2021) The influence of biomechanical stability on bone healing and fracture-related infection: the legacy of Stephan Perren. Injury 52:43–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2020.06.044

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Perren SM (2002) Evolution of the internal fixation of long bone fractures. The scientific basis of biological internal fixation: choosing a new balance between stability and biology. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84:1093–1110. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.84b8.13752

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cheal EJ, Mansmann KA, DiGioia AM et al (1991) Role of interfragmentary strain in fracture healing: ovine model of a healing osteotomy. J Orthop Res 9:131–142. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.1100090116

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Claes LE, Heigele CA (1999) Magnitudes of local stress and strain along bony surfaces predict the course and type of fracture healing. J Biomech 32:255–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9290(98)00153-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hente RW, Perren SM (2021) Tissue deformation controlling fracture healing. J Biomech 125:110576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110576

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Claes L, Augat P, Suger G, Wilke HJ (1997) Influence of size and stability of the osteotomy gap on the success of fracture healing. J Orthop Res 15:577–584. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.1100150414

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Miramini S, Zhang L, Richardson M et al (2016) The relationship between interfragmentary movement and cell differentiation in early fracture healing under locking plate fixation. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 39:123–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-015-0407-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Burny F, Donkerwolcke M, Bourgois R et al (1984) Twenty years experience in fracture healing measurement with strain gauges. Orthopedics 7:1823–1826. https://doi.org/10.3928/0147-7447-19841201-08

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Grasa J, Gómez-Benito MJ, González-Torres LA et al (2010) Monitoring in vivo load transmission through an external fixator. Ann Biomed Eng 38:605–612. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-009-9889-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kristiansen B, Borgwardt A (1992) Fracture healing monitored with strain gauges. External fixation of 7 humeral neck fractures. Acta Orthop Scand 63:612–614. https://doi.org/10.1080/17453679209169719

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Nishimura N (1984) Serial strain gauge measurement of bone healing in hoffmann® external fixation. Orthopedics 7:677–684. https://doi.org/10.3928/0147-7447-19840401-21

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Cunningham JL, Evans M, Kenwright J (1989) Measurement of fracture movement in patients treated with unilateral external skeletal fixation. J Biomed Eng 11:118–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/0141-5425(89)90120-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ogrodnik PJ, Moorcroft CI, Thomas PB (2001) A fracture movement monitoring system to aid in the assessment of fracture healing in humans. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 215:405–414. https://doi.org/10.1243/0954411011535984

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Jenkins P, Nokes L (1994) The use of strain gauges to measurebone fracture healing—a review. Curr Orthop 8:116–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0268-0890(05)80065-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Al Nazer R, Lanovaz J, Kawalilak C et al (2012) Direct in vivo strain measurements in human bone-a systematic literature review. J Biomech 45:27–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.08.004

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Roriz P, Carvalho L, Frazão O et al (2014) From conventional sensors to fibre optic sensors for strain and force measurements in biomechanics applications: a review. J Biomech 47:1251–1261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.01.054

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM et al (2021) The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 372:n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Gattiker F, Umbrecht F, Neuenschwander J et al (2008) Novel ultrasound read-out for a wireless implantable passive strain sensor (WIPSS). Sens Actuators, A 145–146:291–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2007.09.003

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Greve DW, Oppenheim IJ, Chen AF (2012) An instrumented intramedullary implant to monitor strain in fracture healing. In: 2012 IEEE international Ultrasonics symposium. IEEE, p 1220–1223

  24. Nabhani F, Bradley EJ, Hodgson S (2010) Comparison of two tools for the measurement of interfragmentary movement in femoral neck fractures stabilised by cannulated screws. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 26:610–615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2010.06.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Buttermann GR, Janevic JT, Lewis JL et al (1994) Description and application of instrumented staples for measuring in vivo bone strain. J Biomech 27:1087–1094. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(94)90225-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ekenman I, Halvorsen K, Westblad P et al (1998) The reliability and validity of an instrumented staple system for in vivo measurement of local bone deformation. An in vitro study. Scand J Med Sci Sports 8:172–176. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0838.1998.tb00188.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kaspar K, Schell H, Seebeck P et al (2005) Angle stable locking reduces interfragmentary movements and promotes healing after unreamed nailing. Study of a displaced osteotomy model in sheep tibiae. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:2028–2037. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.D.02268

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funds, grants, or other support was received.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

JH, AR, and MDB contributed to methodology; AR, JH, and MDB contributed to formal analysis and investigation; AR contributed to writing-original draft preparation; AR, JH, MB, AP, SC, and CP contributed to writing—review and editing; and MDB contributed to supervision.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Albert J. Rechenmacher.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no relevant financial or nonfinancial interests to disclose.

Consent to participate

The authors declare that this work complies with all the laws of the country in which it was performed.

Ethical approval

This is a narrative, literature review study deemed exempt by the Duke University IRB.

Informed consent

This review study of previously published literature did not involve any participants and therefore did not require any consenting.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 14 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rechenmacher, A.J., Helmkamp, J., Brown, M. et al. Interfragmentary strain measurement post-fixation to guide intraoperative decision making: a narrative review. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 33, 3299–3305 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-023-03605-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-023-03605-y

Keywords

Navigation