Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Outcomes of multiligament knee injury treated with versus without internal brace suture augmentation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To compare the postoperative outcomes between Internal Brace (IB) and non-IB patients who underwent surgical management of multiple-ligament knee injuries (MLKI).

Methods

Patients who underwent surgical management of MLKI at two institutions between 2010 and 2020 were identified and offered participation in the study via the collection of postoperative functional outcomes for MLKI; Lysholm Knee score, Multiligament Quality of Life (ML-QOL), Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) computer adaptive testing (CAT), Pain Interference (PI), Physical Function (PF), and Mobility instruments (MI). The postoperative outcomes and reoperation rates were compared between the IB group and non-IB group.

Results

One hundred and twenty-six patients were analyzed; 89 were included in the IB group (31.5% female; age 35.6 ± 1.4 years), and 37 were included in the non-IB group (25.7% female; age 38.8 ± 2.4 years). Mean follow-up time of the entire cohort was 37.9 ± 4.7 months [IB: 21.8 + 1.63; non-IB: 76.4 ± 6.2, p < 0.001). The IB group achieved similar PROMIS CAT [PROMIS Pain (51.8 + 1.1 vs. 52.1 + 1.6, p = 0.8736), Physical Function (46.6 + 1.2 vs. 46.4 + 1.8, p = 0.9168), Mobility (46.0 + 1.0 vs. 43.7 + 1.6, p = 0.2185)], ML-QOL [ML-QOL Physical Impairment (36.6 + 2.5 vs. 43.5 ± 4.2, p = 0.1485), Emotional Impairment (42.5 + 2.9 vs. 48.6 ± 4.6, p = 0.2695), Activity Limitation (34.5 + 2.8 vs. 36.2 ± 4.3, p = 0.7384), Societal Involvement (39.1 + 3.0 vs. 41.7 + 4.2, p = 0.6434)] and Lysholm knee score (64.9 + 2.5 vs. 60.4 + 4.0, p = 0.3397) postoperatively compared the non-IB group, but the differences were not significant.

Conclusion

In this cohort of patients with MLKI treated with versus without IB, outcomes and reoperation rates trended toward favoring IB, but the study was not sufficiently powered to reach statistical significance. Internal bracing could be useful in the management of MLKI. In the future, matched patient cohorts with more patients are warranted to further evaluate the clinical impact of the internal brace in MLKI.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ng JWG, Myint Y, Ali FM (2020) Management of multiligament knee injuries. EFORT Open Rev 5(3):145–155. https://doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.5.190012

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Qin C, Roth C, Lee C, Athiviraham A (2020) National trends, 90-day readmission and subsequent knee surgery following multi-ligament knee reconstruction. J Orthop 21:49–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jor.2020.01.030

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Dwyer T, Marx RG, Whelan D (2012) Outcomes of treatment of multiple ligament knee injuries. J Knee Surg 25(4):317–326. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1326999

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Schenck RC Jr (1994) The dislocated knee. Instr Course Lect 43:127–136

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Heitmann M, Akoto R, Krause M, Hepp P, Schöpp C, Gensior TJ, Bartl C, Lill H, Frosch KH (2019) Management of acute knee dislocations: anatomic repair and ligament bracing as a new treatment option-results of a multicentre study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 27(8):2710–2718. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-018-5317-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wilson WT, Hopper GP, Byrne PA, MacKay GM (2016) Anterior cruciate ligament repair with internal brace ligament augmentation. Surg Technol Int 29:273–278

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. McIntyre V, Hopper GP, Mackay GM (2019) Anterior cruciate ligament repair in a professional soccer player using internal brace ligament augmentation: a case report focusing on rehabilitation. Surg Technol Int 35:341–348

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rothfeld A, Pawlak A, Liebler SAH, Morris M, Paci JM (2018) Patellar tendon repair augmentation with a knotless suture anchor internal brace: a biomechanical cadaveric study. Am J Sports Med 46(5):1199–1204. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546517751916

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ko PY, Huang MT, Li CL, Su WR, Jou IM, Wu PT (2019) Jigless knotless internal brace technique for acute achilles tendon rupture: a case series study. J Orthop Surg Res 14(1):415. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-019-1471-8

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. van Eck CF, Limpisvasti O, ElAttrache NS (2018) Is there a role for internal bracing and repair of the anterior cruciate ligament? A systematic literature review. Am J Sports Med 46(9):2291–2298. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546517717956

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Jonkergouw A, van der List JP, DiFelice GS (2019) Arthroscopic primary repair of proximal anterior cruciate ligament tears: outcomes of the first 56 consecutive patients and the role of additional internal bracing. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 27(1):21–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-018-5338-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Heusdens CHW, Tilborghs S, Dossche L, Van Dyck P (2019) Primary posterior cruciate ligament repair with the novel suture tape augmentation technique. Surg Technol Int 34:469–475

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ortmaier R, Fink C, Schobersberger W, Kindermann H, Leister I, Runer A, Hepperger C, Blank C, Mattiassich G (2020) Return to sports after anterior cruciate ligament injury: a matched-pair analysis of repair with internal brace and reconstruction using hamstring or quadriceps tendons. Sportverletz Sportschaden. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1019-0949

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cho BK, Park JK, Choi SM, SooHoo NF (2019) A randomized comparison between lateral ligaments augmentation using suture-tape and modified broström repair in young female patients with chronic ankle instability. Foot Ankle Surg 25(2):137–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2017.09.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Xu DL, Gan KF, Li HJ, Zhou SY, Lou ZQ, Wang Y, Li GQ, Ruan CY, Hu XD, Chen YL, Ma WH (2019) Modified broström repair with and without augmentation using suture tape for chronic lateral ankle instability. Orthop Surg 11(4):671–678. https://doi.org/10.1111/os.12516

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Jones CM, Beason DP, Dugas JR (2018) Ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction versus repair with internal bracing: comparison of cyclic fatigue mechanics. Orthop J Sports Med 6(2):2325967118755991. https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967118755991

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Wilson WT, Hopper GP, Byrne PA, MacKay GM (2018) Repair of the ulnar collateral ligament of the elbow with internal brace augmentation: a 5-year follow-up. BMJ Case Rep 11(1):e227113. https://doi.org/10.1136/bcr-2018-227113

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Dabis J, Wilson A (2019) Repair and augmentation with internal brace in the multiligament injured knee. Clin Sports Med 38(2):275–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csm.2018.11.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Vermeijden HD, Jonkergouw A, van der List JP, DiFelice GS (2020) The multiple ligament-injured knee: When is primary repair an option? Knee 27(1):173–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2019.11.013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wijdicks CA, Michalski MP, Rasmussen MT, Goldsmith MT, Kennedy NI, Lind M, Engebretsen L, LaPrade RF (2013) Superficial medial collateral ligament anatomic augmented repair versus anatomic reconstruction: an in vitro biomechanical analysis. Am J Sports Med 41(12):2858–2866. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546513503289

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Trasolini NA, Korber S, Gipsman A, San AE, Weber AE, Hatch GFR III (2019) Performance of PROMIS computer adaptive testing as compared with established instruments for multiple-ligament knee injuries. Orthop J Sports Med 7(9):2325967119867419

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Goyal A, Kumar S, Mishra P, Mehta N, Joshi D, Sinha S (2020) Long term outcome of early single stage surgery in multi-ligamentous injuries of knee. J Clin Orthop Trauma 11(Suppl 4):S650-s656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2020.05.018

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Worley JR, Brimmo O, Nuelle CW, Cook JL, Stannard JP (2019) Incidence of concurrent peroneal nerve injury in multiligament knee injuries and outcomes after knee reconstruction. J Knee Surg 32(6):560–564. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1660512

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. LaPrade RF, Chahla J, DePhillipo NN, Cram T, Kennedy MI, Cinque M, Dornan GJ, O’Brien LT, Engebretsen L, Moatshe G (2019) Single-stage multiple-ligament knee reconstructions for sports-related injuries: outcomes in 194 patients. Am J Sports Med 47(11):2563–2571. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546519864539

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hanley JM, Anthony CA, DeMik D, Glass N, Amendola A, Wolf BR, Bollier M (2017) Patient-reported outcomes after multiligament knee injury: mcl repair versus reconstruction. Orthop J Sports Med 5(3):2325967117694818. https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967117694818

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Jonkergouw A, van der List JP, DiFelice GS (2018) Multiligament repair with suture augmentation in a knee dislocation with medial-sided injury. Arthrosc Tech 7(8):e839–e843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eats.2018.04.006

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Lee JH-Y, Cook JL, Wilson N, Rucinski K, Stannard JP (2020) Outcomes after multiligament knee injury reconstruction using novel graft constructs and techniques. J Knee Surg 35(05):502–510. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1716356

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hatch GFR 3rd, Villacis D, Damodar D, Dacey M, Yi A (2018) Quality of life and functional outcomes after multiligament knee reconstruction. J Knee Surg 31(10):970–978. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1626737

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Arciero RA (2005) Anatomic posterolateral corner knee reconstruction. Arthroscopy 21(9):1147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2005.06.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. LaPrade RF, Johansen S, Wentorf FA, Engebretsen L, Esterberg JL, Tso A (2004) An analysis of an anatomical posterolateral knee reconstruction: an in vitro biomechanical study and development of a surgical technique. Am J Sports Med 32(6):1405–1414. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546503262687

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Borden PS, Kantaras AT, Caborn DN (2002) Medial collateral ligament reconstruction with allograft using a double-bundle technique. Arthroscopy 18(4):E19. https://doi.org/10.1053/jars.2002.32235

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Dong JT, Chen BC, Men XQ, Wang F, Hao JD, Zhao JN, Wang XF, Zhang XY, Sun R (2012) Application of triangular vector to functionally reconstruct the medial collateral ligament with double bundle allograft technique. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg 28(10):1445–1453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Lind M, Jakobsen BW, Lund B, Hansen MS, Abdallah O, Christiansen SE (2009) Anatomical reconstruction of the medial collateral ligament and posteromedial corner of the knee in patients with chronic medial collateral ligament instability. Am J Sports Med 37(6):1116–1122. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546509332498

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Black AK, Schlepp C, Zapf M, Reid JB 3rd (2018) Technique for arthroscopically assisted superficial and deep medial collateral ligament-meniscotibial ligament repair with internal brace augmentation. Arthrosc Tech 7(11):e1215–e1219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eats.2018.08.006

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Gilmer BB, Crall T, DeLong J, Kubo T, Mackay G, Jani SS (2016) Biomechanical analysis of internal bracing for treatment of medial knee injuries. Orthopedics 39(3):e532-537. https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20160427-13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Heusdens CHW, Hopper GP, Dossche L, Roelant E, Mackay GM (2019) Anterior cruciate ligament repair with Independent Suture Tape Reinforcement: a case series with 2-year follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 27(1):60–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-018-5239-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Hopper GP, Heusdens CHW, Dossche L, Mackay GM (2019) Posterior cruciate ligament repair with suture tape augmentation. Arthrosc Tech 8(1):e7–e10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eats.2018.08.022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Hopper GP, Jenkins JM, Mackay GM (2020) Percutaneous medial collateral ligament repair and posteromedial corner repair with suture tape augmentation. Arthrosc Tech 9(5):e587–e591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eats.2020.01.008

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Lubowitz JH, MacKay G, Gilmer B (2014) Knee medial collateral ligament and posteromedial corner anatomic repair with internal bracing. Arthrosc Tech 3(4):e505-508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eats.2014.05.008

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Smith JO, Yasen SK, Palmer HC, Lord BR, Britton EM, Wilson AJ (2016) Paediatric ACL repair reinforced with temporary internal bracing. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24(6):1845–1851. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-016-4150-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Trasolini NA, Rick Hatch GF (2018) Suture augmentation: an alternative to reconstruction for incomplete posterior cruciate ligament injuries in the multiple ligament-injured knee. Arthrosc Tech 7(3):e239–e243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eats.2017.08.074

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. van der List JP, DiFelice GS (2017) Primary repair of the medial collateral ligament with internal bracing. Arthrosc Tech 6(4):e933–e937. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eats.2017.03.003

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Otto A, Helal A, Imhoff FB, Mehl J, Herbst E, Achtnich AE, Forkel P, Imhoff AB, Schmitt A (2020) Promising clinical and magnetic resonance imaging results after internal bracing of acute posterior cruciate ligament lesions in multiple injured knees. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 28(8):2543–2550. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-020-05852-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Goyal T, Paul S, Banerjee S, Das L (2021) Outcomes of one-stage reconstruction for chronic multiligament injuries of knee. Knee Surg Relat Res 33(1):1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Lachman JR, Rehman S, Pipitone PS (2015) Traumatic knee dislocations: evaluation, management, and surgical treatment. Orthop Clin North Am 46(4):479–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocl.2015.06.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was received.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander E. Weber.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

G.H.: Arthrex (consulting fee), Micromed (hospitality payments). E.A.: Arthrex (consulting fee, speaker fees), KCI USA (consulting fee, speaker fee) Pacira Pharm (consulting fee) Stryker (hospitality payments) Avanos (hospitality payments). All other authors have no competing interests.

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Boards of the University of Southern California, study #HS-17-00301. This investigation complied with the current laws of the country in which it took place.

Informed consent

Informed consent was received by each participant.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Korber, S.S., Fathi, A., Bolia, I.K. et al. Outcomes of multiligament knee injury treated with versus without internal brace suture augmentation. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 34, 303–309 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-023-03575-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-023-03575-1

Keywords

Navigation