Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A comparison of outcomes for above-knee-amputation and arthrodesis for the chronically infected total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Several strategies have been shown to have some efficacy in the chronically infected total knee arthroplasty (TKA): chronic antibiotic suppression, a second two-stage revision, arthrodesis, and above-the-knee amputation (AKA). We conducted a systematic review to determine the efficacy of these treatments in patients who had previously received a two-stage revision.

Methods

A systematic review of the literature was performed which investigated PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases. Chronic infection was defined as a persistent infection of a TKA after a previous two-stage revision. Studies were independently evaluated by two reviewers. Quality appraisal was performed using MINORS Criteria.

Results

14 studies were included for the final review. For chronically infected TKA, a second two-stage revision was often sufficient to control infection. If revision failed, the most common next procedure was either a repeat revision or AKA. AKA patients had less pain and higher quality of life scores compared to arthrodesis, but a higher five-year mortality rate.

Discussion and conclusion

Chronic infection in TKA offers a multitude of challenges for orthopedic surgeons. We found that arthrodesis and AKA were not significantly different in rates of infection eradication or quality of life. We recommend clinicians to actively discuss options with patients to find a procedure most suitable for them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lee YS, Chen AF (2018) Two-stage reimplantation in infected total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Relat Res 30(2):107

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Mortazavi SM, Molligan J, Austin MS, Purtill JJ, Hozack WJ, Parvizi J (2011) Failure following revision total knee arthroplasty: infection is the major cause. Int Orthop 35(8):1157–1164

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lu J, Han J, Zhang C, Yang Y, Yao Z (2017) Infection after total knee arthroplasty and its gold standard surgical treatment: spacers used in two-stage revision arthroplasty. Intractable Rare Dis Res

  4. Carlos Rodríguez-Merchán E, Oussedik S (2017) The infected total knee arthroplasty: prevention, diagnosis, and treatment. Springer

    Google Scholar 

  5. Röhner E, Windisch C, Nuetzmann K, Rau M, Arnhold M, Matziolis G (2015) Unsatisfactory outcome of arthrodesis performed after septic failure of revision total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 97(4):298

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Premkumar A, Kolin DA, Farley KX, Wilson JM, McLawhorn AS, Cross MB, Sculco PK (2021) Projected economic burden of periprosthetic joint infection of the hip and knee in the United States. J Arthroplasty 36(5):1484–1489

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sabah SA, Alvand A, Price AJ (2021) Revision knee replacement for prosthetic joint infection: Epidemiology, clinical outcomes and health-economic considerations. Knee 28:417–421

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kurtz SM, Higgs GB, Lau E, Iorio RR, Courtney PM, Parvizi J (2022) Hospital costs for unsuccessful two-stage revisions for periprosthetic joint infection. J Arthroplasty 37(2):205–212

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kremers HM, Larson DR, Crowson CS, Kremers WK, Washington RE, Steiner CA, Berry DJ (2015) Prevalence of total hip and knee replacement in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am 97(17):1386

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gehrke T, Alijanipour P, Parvizi J (2015) The management of an infected total knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint J 97(10):20–29

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Barry JJ, Geary MB, Riesgo AM, Odum SM, Fehring TK, Springer BD (2021) Irrigation and debridement with chronic antibiotic suppression is as effective as 2-stage exchange in revision total knee arthroplasty with extensive instrumentation. JBJS 103(1):53–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Vahedi H, Aali-Rezaie A, Shahi A, Conway JD (2019) Irrigation, debridement, and implant retention for recurrence of Periprosthetic joint infection following two-stage revision total knee arthroplasty: a matched cohort study. J Arthroplasty 34(8):1772–1775

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Carr JB II, Werner BC, Browne JA (2016) Trends and outcomes in the treatment of failed septic total knee arthroplasty: comparing arthrodesis and above-knee amputation. J Arthroplasty 31(7):1574–1577

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wu CH, Gray CF, Lee GC (2014) Arthrodesis should be strongly considered after failed two-stage reimplantation TKA. Clin Orthopaed Relat Res 472(11):3295–3304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Robinson M, Piponov HI, Ormseth A, Helder CW, Schwartz B, Gonzalez MH (2018) Knee arthrodesis outcomes after infected total knee arthroplasty and failure of two-stage revision with an antibiotic cement spacer. J Am Acad Orthopaedic Surg Global Res Rev 2(1)

  16. Rodríguez-Merchán EC, Corte-Rodriguez HDL, Román-Belmonte JM (2018) Above knee amputation in the treatment of failed septic total knee arthroplasty. Infected Total Knee Arthroplasty, 181–191

  17. Slim K, Nini E, Forestier D, Kwiatkowski F, Panis Y, Chipponi J (2003) Methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS): development and validation of a new instrument. ANZ J Surg 73(9):712–716

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Khanna V, Tushinski DM, Soever LJ, Vincent AD, Backstein DJ (2015) Above knee amputation following total knee arthroplasty: when enough is enough. J Arthroplasty 30(4):658–662

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sierra RJ, Trousdale RT, Pagnano MW (2003) Above-the-knee amputation after a total knee replacement: prevalence, etiology, and functional outcome. JBJS 85(6):1000–1004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Fedorka CJ, Chen AF, McGarry WM, Parvizi J, Klatt BA (2011) Functional ability after above-the-knee amputation for infected total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthopaedics Relat Res 469(4):1024–1032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Isiklar ZU, Landon GC, Tullos HS (1994) Amputation after failed total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthopaedics Relat Res 299:173–178

    Google Scholar 

  22. Pring DJ, Marks L, Angel JC (1988) Mobility after amputation for failed knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 70(5):770–771

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Orfanos AV, Michael RJ, Keeney BJ, Moschetti WE (2020) Patient-reported outcomes after above-knee amputation for prosthetic joint infection. Knee 27(3):1101–1105

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hungerer S, Kiechle M, von Rüden C, Militz M, Beitzel K, Morgenstern M (2017) Knee arthrodesis versus above-the-knee amputation after septic failure of revision total knee arthroplasty: comparison of functional outcome and complication rates. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 18(1):1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Chen AF, Kinback NC, Heyl AE, McClain EJ, Klatt BA (2012) Better function for fusions versus above-the-knee amputations for recurrent periprosthetic knee infection. Clin Orthopaedics Relat Res 470(10):2737–2745

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Trouillez T, Faure PA, Martinot P, Migaud H, Senneville E, Pasquier G, Putman S (2021) Above–the–knee amputation versus knee arthrodesis for revision of infected total knee arthroplasty: recurrent infection rates and functional outcomes of 43 patients at a mean follow-up of 6.7 years. Orthopaedics Traumatol Surg Res 107(4):102914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Yeung CM, Lichstein PM, Varady NH, Maguire JH, Chen AF, Estok DM II (2020) Knee arthrodesis is a durable option for the salvage of infected total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 35(11):3261–3268

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Son MS, Lau E, Parvizi J, Mont MA, Bozic KJ, Kurtz S (2017) What are the frequency, associated factors, and mortality of amputation and arthrodesis after a failed infected TKA? Clin Orthopaedics Relat Res 475(12):2905–2913

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Razii N, Abbas AM, Kakar R, Agarwal S, Morgan-Jones R (2016) Knee arthrodesis with a long intramedullary nail as limb salvage for complex periprosthetic infections. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 26(8):907–914

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Petty W, Bryan RS, Coventry MB, Peterson LF (1975) Infection after total knee arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 6(4):1005–1014

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Rodriguez-Merchan EC (2012) Risk factors of infection following total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Surg 20(2):236–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Wilson MG, Kelley K, Thornhill TS (1990) Infection as a complication of total knee-replacement arthroplasty. Risk factors and treatment in sixty-seven cases. JBJS 72(6):878–883

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Somayaji HS et al (2008) Knee arthrodesis—a review. The Knee 15(4):247–254

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Vivacqua T et al (2021) Functional outcome of patients undergoing knee arthrodesis after infected total arthroplasty. Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia 56:320–325

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael C. Edgar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institution and have been approved by the appropriate ethics committee and have, therefore, been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Edgar, M.C., Alderman, R.J., Scharf, I.M. et al. A comparison of outcomes for above-knee-amputation and arthrodesis for the chronically infected total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 33, 2933–2941 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-023-03507-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-023-03507-z

Keywords

Navigation